Making a mono guitar into a stereo one.

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

User avatar
allbaldo
pushin' record
Posts: 282
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 8:21 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK.
Contact:

Making a mono guitar into a stereo one.

Post by allbaldo » Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:57 am

I did a record a while ago, with a very good guitarist that has VERY specific ideas of what he wants, and is very particular about the performance. He also wanted the guitars to be done in 1 performance, and not double tracked. I tracked the record with mock stereo guitars, done with 2 amps/cabinets, close mic'ed, with MS stereo out front, which did a decent job of giving us a stereo guitar sound with one performance.

We finished the record, but he decided that he wanted to re-do most of the guitars himself. I gave him the songs we'd done without the guitars in the mix, and he tracked what he wanted to track. The new tracks are mono, and he wants me to fit the new guitars into the mixes we already have, so the question is...

What is your favorite way to make a mono guitar performance into a stereo, or close to stereo one?

Thanks!

User avatar
JWL
deaf.
Posts: 1870
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: Maine
Contact:

Post by JWL » Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:06 pm

Depending on the music/sound/song, I probably wouldn't bother. I always prefer doubled parts to artificial stereo. That said, try copying the track and delaying one of them 10-25ms. EQ them differently (complementary) for even more fun.

I might thicken it up with a bit of delay or reverb, which essentially stereo-izes the part. Depends on what the song needs.

User avatar
suppositron
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:59 am
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Post by suppositron » Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:09 pm

The easiest way is to take a copy of the track and delay it by a very short time, like 20-30 milliseconds, and pan the original and delayed signal on opposite sides of the stereo field. If it's done on tape, use a delay unit, if on pro tools you can simply copy the track and nudge it. But make sure it's by a small amount. I used to do that when I first started making music and if the nudge or delay is too big you get phase cancellations and it sounds horrid.

User avatar
DrummerMan
george martin
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:18 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by DrummerMan » Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:14 pm

Something I like to do, when it fits, is have the raw track panned to, say, right to 3 o'clock, then have all the reverb hard panned left. It doesn't always fit the music or the song, but when it does it can be cool.

Alternately, you could reamp the track into another guitar amp and feed that back in to the mix, just nudging it around until it doesn't present a phasing problem.
Geoff Mann
composer | drummer | Los Angeles, CA

rwc
resurrected
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: Bed Stuy, Brooklyn

Post by rwc » Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:19 pm

For some reason that delay and put it to the side shit always sounds lame to me.

If the guitarist has a car, pan it hard left.

If he is typically a passenger, pan it hard right.

and be done with it.
Real friends stab you in the front.

Oscar Wilde

Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York

User avatar
suppositron
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:59 am
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Post by suppositron » Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:20 pm

Yeah, reamping would be my first choice if he printed a d.i. signal.

Ron's Brother
gettin' sounds
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:04 pm
Location: NH

Post by Ron's Brother » Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:28 pm

I may not be able to explain it exactly... but here we go...

Leave track one of the guitar alone and pan it hard left. Create a new "blank" track and pan it hard right

identify parts of the song that are playing similar phrases. We'll call them sections a, b and c. Copy phrase A from the guitar track and paste it into the blank track when phrase B is playing on the original "guitar track". Take phrase b and paste it where phrase C is playing ETC.

Am I explaining this well?

User avatar
farview
tinnitus
Posts: 1204
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: St. Charles (chicago) IL
Contact:

Post by farview » Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:42 pm

Take a dual pitch shifter and set it for 6 cents up one one side and 6 cents down on the other side. You end up with a 90's Van Halen sort of guitar sound, depending on how wet you make it.

It ends up sounding like a chorus that doesn's sweep.

ashcat_lt
tinnitus
Posts: 1094
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Duluth, MN
Contact:

Post by ashcat_lt » Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:32 am

I've mentioned this around here before. If you can find a way to pan it really fast - like at audio frequencies - it can sometimes create an interesting stereo impression. Since the sound doesn't go away, just bounces back and forth, you don't seem to get that ring modulated AM sound. Maybe "fill in" the spaces with a little light touch of verb.

dsw
tinnitus
Posts: 1247
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: Portland Oregon

Post by dsw » Sat Nov 01, 2008 1:13 pm

you could have the dry original track on one side and then pre-delay verb track on the other.
"Analog smells like thrift stores. Digital smells like tiny hands from far away." - O-it-hz

musicians are fuckers, but even worse are people who like musicians, they're total fuckers.

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Sat Nov 01, 2008 1:48 pm

I love using an Effectron for this for a few reasons:

The sort of grainy, digital sound makes for a "not-exact" stereo companion to the original signal.

It's VERY easy to adjust delay times and output polarity to get the mono compatibility and width where you like it best.

The modulation parameters can make for something a little more exciting than just a delayed signal. You can be really subtle with it or really extreme. You'd be surprised at how often "really extreme" works.

There are, however, a million ways to do it. The Orban Stereo Synthesizer is another box that does this kind of thing well with interesting parameters. Sometimes, I'll just send the mono guitar to something like an SPX 90 (or 990 or whatever) and use the panning function in some regard to bring the signal back in stereo. Reamping is usually a possibility where you can tailor mic positions to fit your needs. Sometimes just using any type of effect that removes or reduces the center can be an interesting way to make a mono signal stereo. I'm just waiting for chorusing to become hip again.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

mattwhritenour
pushin' record
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Oak Ridge
Contact:

Post by mattwhritenour » Sat Nov 01, 2008 2:14 pm

Ron's Brother wrote:I may not be able to explain it exactly... but here we go...

Leave track one of the guitar alone and pan it hard left. Create a new "blank" track and pan it hard right

identify parts of the song that are playing similar phrases. We'll call them sections a, b and c. Copy phrase A from the guitar track and paste it into the blank track when phrase B is playing on the original "guitar track". Take phrase b and paste it where phrase C is playing ETC.

Am I explaining this well?
I've done this with gang/group vocals, it can work very well and is like having the performances overdubbedl

User avatar
NeglectedFred
pushin' record
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:53 pm
Location: Salt Lake City

Post by NeglectedFred » Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:39 pm

I've found myself trying to emulate MS with a single mono track on a few occasions. I copy the track, and do very slight, almost inaudible tweeks. Maybe a slight reverb (only add like 4-6% effect), eq it brighter, add slight phase, flange, or chorus - emphasis on almost inaudible.

Now here's the trick, zoom really close to both tracks, so that you only see maybe a dozen or less wave modulations on the screen at once.

Now nudge the effected track so that it's about 45 degrees offset. Here's my logic, if at 180 one is at top peak while other is at bottom, then 90 would be one at top while other is at zero, so 45 would be half peak while other is a zero.

Now pan one left and one right (this is only step one) and mixdown a new mono copy.

Now reverse the phase of one channel while leaving the other untouched, and mixdown to a second mono copy.

Now take the new copys, pan one left, one right, and walla!!!! I promise it works.
I eat glue.

mjau
speech impediment
Posts: 4034
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Post by mjau » Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:21 am

I've fed a mono track into a stereo verb with really short decay times, and used the 100% wet signal as the guitar sound. Worked in that particular context but I wouldn't rely on it all the time.

Chris's effectron suggestion is also useful. Those things are too awesome.

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7542
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:37 pm

Could you send the new parts to the two amps you used on the old parts? Set up close mics and the M/S pair and then recreate the sound from the first sessions?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 183 guests