Protools LE mixer

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
protoolsman
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:12 am
Contact:

Protools LE mixer

Post by protoolsman » Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:23 pm

Hey guyz,

I never thought about this but what kind of mixer is PT8 LE using. See, my Mix+ and HD have a choice between stereo mixer, stereo dithered mixer and surround dithered mixer. For some reason Surround dithered mixer is most DSP friendly and sound the best (to me). But in LE you don't have a choice. So: is LE's mixer dithered?
:)
one can never have to many microphones

protoolsman
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:12 am
Contact:

Post by protoolsman » Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:57 am

Let's reply to myself (to keep it here)... How many of you have any clue on what's going on dither wise in PT8? :)
one can never have to many microphones

earth tones
steve albini likes it
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Post by earth tones » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:03 am

Based on what I have read in the Pro Tools 8 Reference manual, I would guess that the mix buss is not dithered until you apply dither (via a plug-in) to the Master Fader track. Can't say I know this for sure though.

From pg. 960 of the PT8 Reference PDF:

"ProToolsLE and M-Powered systems use 24-
bit audio input and output signal paths, and
internal 32-bit floating point processing for
mixing and audio processing
Using Dither on an Output Mix
ProTools includes real-time dither plug-ins that
improve 16-, 18-, or 20-bit performance and reducing the
bit depth of an output mix."

pg. 867:

"Some AudioSuite plug-ins can
automatically apply dither when processing.
You can select this option in the Processing Pref-
erences page.Dithered Mixer Plug-ins (ProTools HD Only)
Digidesign has developed a mixer that provides
all of the benefits of the standard Stereo Mixer"
Last edited by earth tones on Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

protoolsman
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:12 am
Contact:

Post by protoolsman » Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:59 am

OK...That's clear. :) Thanks for that. Now, on the HD session it says dither "on every node". Which means (I think) every single input output.
Another question than: does mix made on LE sound better on HD because of dither? Or...and....if...I'm kind of stuck.
one can never have to many microphones

dsw
tinnitus
Posts: 1247
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: Portland Oregon

Post by dsw » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:00 pm

Sounds better on HD because of the AD/DA conversion and Automatic Delay Compensation.

You don't mention the interface you're using with your systems, but IMHO the conversion is the thing that makes the most difference between any DAW system.
Other variables such as room, pre's, technique, sun spots, etc.... come into play obviously but to quantify the difference between DAWs based on dithering is, I think, really hard to do.
"Analog smells like thrift stores. Digital smells like tiny hands from far away." - O-it-hz

musicians are fuckers, but even worse are people who like musicians, they're total fuckers.

protoolsman
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:12 am
Contact:

Post by protoolsman » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:06 pm

I am using a 002, but I am trying to figure out the difference when mixing out of the box.Lowering the volume on a track will lower the quality. Dither would make the noise floor a little higher but have less distortion. Who knows the answer to this? :)
one can never have to many microphones

earth tones
steve albini likes it
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Post by earth tones » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:31 pm

I am not sure if I understand your question...and how you are relating the decrease of a track's level in a mix to dither.

Dither is a psychoacoustic technology (algorithm) that is used to salvage the sonic data within a bit-depth range which will eventually be truncated (wordlength reduction). The most common situation for the application of dither is when a 24-bit recording/mix is bounced or mixed down to a 16-bit format. What happens to bits 17-24 when this happens. Without dither, they are simply gone. So say goodbye to the audible data that was being stored in that range. By applying dither (complex noise) it allows the audible data within the planned-for-truncation 8 bits to be preserved within the range of the resulting 16 bits. (go read about dither for a detailed depiction of how dither magically toggles this data into the 16th bit).

By adding this noise to the signal, it would decrease the signal to noise ratio, but marginally. Plus, most of the modern dither algorithms have shifted the frequency content of the dither signal far above the upper limits of human hearing (20kz).

protoolsman
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:12 am
Contact:

Post by protoolsman » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:50 pm

Agreed; so if I lower level on a track I will use less bits of the 24 available. Or: distortion gets higher (because of rounding of). So in HD or TDM sets you can choose a dithered mixer that will put dither on every single track. The noisefloor gets a little higher this way but distortion figures are better.

Maybe this link to duc.digidesign will clear things:
http://duc.digidesign.com/showthread.ph ... 901&page=3

I am in no way a computer wizz but I would really like to know what the fuzz is about on TDM, and if this also is a factor in LE.
But thanks for all the help already! :)[/img]
one can never have to many microphones

locosoundman
pushin' record
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: in my own little world

Post by locosoundman » Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:16 pm

most of the modern dither algorithms have shifted the frequency content of the dither signal far above the upper limits of human hearing (20kz).
This is true for higher PCM sample rates and Sigma Delta, but I am not sure that this applies to lower sample rates, since I would think that the anti-aliasing filters would effectively remove the dither.

Noise shaping tends to place most of the energy in the higher frequencies since this is a range that many people cannot really "hear" except at high intensity, but this is based on perceptual models, and still falls within the audible spectrum.

I can only speak as to what I hear: when I am applying 16-bit dither to mixes at 44.1 and 48, I tend to prefer the sound of the flat dither as opposed to the noise-shaped (not always - but most of the time). The high frequencies seem to get "blurry" or "clouded" to my ear when I use the noise-shaped.
"We have met the enemy and he is us"
- Pogo Possum

User avatar
wedge
tinnitus
Posts: 1088
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

Post by wedge » Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:12 pm

protoolsman wrote:Lowering the volume on a track will lower the quality.
You mean, when tracking? Not necessarily... There's a lot more wiggle room than you might think, especially with 24 bit... Also, why don't you just wait until the CD burning/mastering point to have dither applied? Everything up until then can be whatever bit depth you wish to use...

User avatar
leigh
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1636
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:16 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Protools LE mixer

Post by leigh » Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:42 pm

protoolsman wrote:Hey guyz [sic],

I never thought about this but what kind of mixer is PT8 LE using. See, my Mix+ and HD have a choice between stereo mixer, stereo dithered mixer and surround dithered mixer. For some reason Surround dithered mixer is most DSP friendly and sound the best (to me). But in LE you don't have a choice. So: is LE's mixer dithered?
:)
NO

LE's mixer is not dithered, because LE keeps it 32-bit floating point. Hence, no need to dither.

Now, stop losing sleep over this kind of stuff and go make something beautiful.

protoolsman
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:12 am
Contact:

Post by protoolsman » Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:46 am

To Leigh: LOL , I already was!
It's the kind of thing that get's stuck in your head. I did my reading on floating pioint calculations and came to the conslusion that because of the "floating" aspect there is less rounding of going on. I guess the question "why not use this in HD" is pointless?

I still enjoy protools 8 very much and can't wait for my 003 with Black Lion mod.
Still making beauty Leigh :)
one can never have to many microphones

chris harris
speech impediment
Posts: 4270
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
Location: Norman, OK
Contact:

Post by chris harris » Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:16 am

good gawd!!!

do you hear a decline in quality when lowering a fader?

If yes, then I say you're full of shit.
If no, then what difference does it make?

protoolsman
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:12 am
Contact:

Post by protoolsman » Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:12 pm

Don't worry, I am just wondering how this all works, not at all a*** about it. And to answer your question: Working in HD (now) YES I can hear the difference. I hear it on reverb, on guitar and piano. Not so much on drums. But I do know there are MANY variables and reasons why this is. I have not yet tried this in LE. :)
one can never have to many microphones

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 197 guests