baffling question about cardioid mics pickup pattern

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
groover
gettin' sounds
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Los Angeles

baffling question about cardioid mics pickup pattern

Post by groover » Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:10 pm

It is my understanding that the way a cardioid mic pickup pattern in controlled is through some kind of interaction/cancellation between sound hitting the mic from the front and sound hitting it from the rear. (thus a cardioid works more like an omni when the rear of the mic is closed off, like when cupping it in one's hand for example)

This made me wonder about baffles and isolation. Let's say we are mic'ing sound source A with a cardioid mic placed south of the source, facing north. South of the mic is another sound source B which we want to keep out of the cardioid as much as possible.

If we put a baffle up just south of the mic to block source B would this not cause less sound pressure to hit the mic from the southerly direction, thereby interfering with the internal cancellation, and causing the mic to reproduce more of the sound of B which is hitting it from other indirect directions than if there were no baffle? Or am I missing something?

Alternate form of question - what is the most effective placement of baffles to keep source B out of the mic?

User avatar
Scodiddly
speech impediment
Posts: 4012
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Mundelein, IL, USA
Contact:

Post by Scodiddly » Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:42 pm

The baffling has to be right around the back of the capsule - it's like an omni with a leak in the shell surrounding the backside of the diaphragm.

groover
gettin' sounds
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by groover » Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:13 pm

huh? or should I say to do which?

User avatar
Scodiddly
speech impediment
Posts: 4012
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Mundelein, IL, USA
Contact:

Post by Scodiddly » Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:31 pm

If you just hang a diaphragm in open air, it's going to be a figure-8. If you enclose the backside, it'll be an omni. Cardioid is produced by mixing figure-8 with omni, basically by letting some sound leak through the enclosure. So cardioid mics have the back enclosed by a material (cloth or foam like stuff) that allows some sound to get through. Or maybe just tiny holes... but the important thing is that it's part of the enclosure around the back of the diaphragm. Bear in mind that all this is happening in a very localized area. It happens in a space where a wavelength of about the same size would be 10KHz or higher.

Your hypothetical baffles out in open space aren't part of that enclosure.

groover
gettin' sounds
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by groover » Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:06 pm

Yes, the baffles are farther away, but don't they effectively change the direction of the sound source, thus changing the way it will be cancelled by the capsule?

Or maybe the baffles are cutting/blocking the direct sound and what I am dealing with is reflected sound, which is thus coming from a different direction than due south in my hypothetical.

User avatar
Scodiddly
speech impediment
Posts: 4012
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Mundelein, IL, USA
Contact:

Post by Scodiddly » Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:07 am

I think you're taking the very special (and weird) case of how a cardioid works and trying to apply it to all baffles in general.

A baffle very close to the back of a mic might compromise the pickup pattern somewhat, but otherwise it'll act as a baffle and block some sound from that direction.

User avatar
ott0bot
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2023
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Downtown Phoenix

Post by ott0bot » Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:00 pm

this question is truly baffling!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests