my drums never sound "up front in the mix"

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:41 pm

MoreSpaceEcho wrote:was that the mike strauss record? those mixes had a real nice depth to them.
Thanks man! No, the new Mike Strauss was just a good bit of 100Hz in the snare and a little bit of top added. Probably either 5k or 7.5k. Don't remember. Also, David Kim's left hand. He's got a good one. I've also got a handful of tricks for getting the vocal to sit in front of other stuff if the need arises. It's mostly got to do with different electronics stuff. That and oftentimes a Federal compressor.

This particular record I mentioned is for this guy Bruce Hazel. Sort of punkier version of Springsteen.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

User avatar
Snarl 12/8
cryogenically thawing
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: Right Cheer
Contact:

Post by Snarl 12/8 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:48 pm

Try hi-passing every track that doesn't have explicit low frequency information that you need. (IE everything except kick) and even on the kick, hi-pass it, but at a lower frequency. It could be that you have a fuckload of low-frequency information that's chewing up all your headroom. Do this before any compression.

Also, have you tried carving out frequency ranges for the stuff that's getting buried? IE, decide whether you want the kick or bass-guitar to be the lowest thing in the mix, then high pass one at a higher frequency than the others. Cut a little 3k in the guitars and boost the snare there. Maybe even low-pass guitars, bass, background vocals, so that the hi-hats and cymbals can sit on top of everything except the lead vocals.

Don't get too carried away. Maybe just cut the frequencies of stuff that's on top of the drums where you don't want it, but don't boost the drums if you only have shitty eq at your disposal.
Carl Keil

Almost forgot: Please steal my drum tracks. and more.

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:52 pm

Good advice!

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

User avatar
Snarl 12/8
cryogenically thawing
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: Right Cheer
Contact:

Post by Snarl 12/8 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:34 pm

cgarges wrote:Good advice!

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
Me? That's a first.

I gotta say that I've always hoped the above approach would be a panacea to effed up tracking and it never really works when I feel the need to go totally apeshit, but it can help get something "out front" if you're *almost there* via other means.

Ideally you'd do the "eq'ing" via playing, amp choice, instrument settings, amp settings, mic choice, mic placement, tuning, etc. in tracking rather than at the console come mix time.

I remember when I went to see the Bad Brains live. When they were warming up I was starting to get really dissappointed at how thin the guitar sounded on its own. I really wanted to hear a crushingly heavy show. Once they all started playing it sounded perfect to me. The bass had no real info above probably 1-2kHz and the guitar nothing below that. The drums were a little on the clicky side, vox very midrangey. Now I hear how thin the guitar sounds on the records, and how everything's in its sonic niche, but it's balanced. The thickness comes from the mix of everything, the energy of the playing, the subject matter and the arrangements. Everything out front, just like Jah intended.
Carl Keil

Almost forgot: Please steal my drum tracks. and more.

User avatar
jgimbel
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:51 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by jgimbel » Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:53 pm

Snarl 12/8 wrote:Try hi-passing every track that doesn't have explicit low frequency information that you need. (IE everything except kick) and even on the kick, hi-pass it, but at a lower frequency. It could be that you have a fuckload of low-frequency information that's chewing up all your headroom. Do this before any compression.
Good to hear I'm not doing something insane. I've mentioned in a few threads that my "big aha moment" of the past year has been low cuts (and sometimes high cuts). I'm working on an album now which is sounding better than anything I've recorded before, and I'm almost always hi-passing guitars (when they don't need those frequencies), always hi-passing vocals, often hi-passing kick at a low frequency, and sometimes hi-passing bass at a lower frequency. It's amazing, it completely solves the problem of endlessly adding more top end to one thing after another to try to get it to sound "present". My recording's sound so much more professional since I started doing this, though I think I'm doing it a lot more extremely than I usually read about.

MoreSpaceEcho
zen recordist
Posts: 6687
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am

Post by MoreSpaceEcho » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:52 pm

i sometimes wonder if i'm the only one who doesn't like the hipass so much...

User avatar
Snarl 12/8
cryogenically thawing
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: Right Cheer
Contact:

Post by Snarl 12/8 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:13 pm

MoreSpaceEcho wrote:i sometimes wonder if i'm the only one who doesn't like the hipass so much...
I only said to try it. It might help with the specific problem. I also said I haven't found it to be the panacea that I hoped for, but that I think it's definitely helped in some cases.

Are you generally recording using a pro, treated space, pro mics, pro musicians, pro gear, etc.? I could imagine that the law of diminishing returns spikes pretty quickly when things start off more ideal to begin with.
Carl Keil

Almost forgot: Please steal my drum tracks. and more.

User avatar
vivalastblues
steve albini likes it
Posts: 350
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:30 am
Location: Australia

Post by vivalastblues » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:23 pm

thanks thethingwiththestuff and Snarl for the awesome posts in this thread!

User avatar
Waltz Mastering
steve albini likes it
Posts: 335
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:22 am
Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Contact:

Post by Waltz Mastering » Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:06 am

MoreSpaceEcho wrote:i sometimes wonder if i'm the only one who doesn't like the hipass so much...
I only use them as a last resort, and only if something really funky is happening down there.
Snarl 12/8 wrote:Are you generally recording using a pro, treated space, pro mics, pro musicians, pro gear, etc.? I could imagine that the law of diminishing returns spikes pretty quickly when things start off more ideal to begin with.


I think even more than that, it's really a matter that a lot of monitors really don't give you to much accurate info below 40 Hz or so, so a lot of people just seem to default to hp filtering because they aren't using a full range speaker system and would rather error on the side of caution with out realizing that they're creating a bump right around the cut-off frequency that will sometimes cause you to lose a dB or two of head room and also propagate the problem that one is trying to alleviate.

W DeMarco
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:58 am
Location: Cleveland!!
Contact:

Post by W DeMarco » Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:59 am

I couldnt imagine mixing drums without hpf's. Once I started using them more often my drumsound became very upfront. However I tend not to hit the kick if at all, and the floor is always if it really needs it I might. Great thread and lots of good tips in here

MoreSpaceEcho
zen recordist
Posts: 6687
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am

Post by MoreSpaceEcho » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:11 am

i'm in full agreement with Mr. Waltz here. i used to be all about the hipass until i got good monitors and a sub and could actually hear what was going on in the bottom two octaves. and i realized that subs weren't something to be afraid of.

i'd say that in mastering i use a hipass maybe 5% of the time. but i cut somewhere between 80 and 400 probably like 75% of the time. so i really think that in tracking and mixing, the real low stuff is less likely to be your enemy than the stuff that builds up in the upper bass/low midrange.

also i think that if you're doing parallel drum stuff, a hipass on the parallel can do weird things with the phase, which will not be your friend when you go to combine it with the dry tracks. maybe i'm nuts, i dunno.

snarl, i wasn't trying to imply you were giving bad advice or anything, i just see the 'highpass everything' so often on teh interwebz that it makes my knee jerk. don't get me started on time-aligning.

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:15 am

MoreSpaceEcho wrote:also i think that if you're doing parallel drum stuff, a hipass on the parallel can do weird things with the phase, which will not be your friend when you go to combine it with the dry tracks. maybe i'm nuts, i dunno.
A high-pass or a low-pass filter on ANYTHING in parallel will mess with the phase. This applies to compression, distortion, reverb, whatever. Sometimes you can use this to your advantage, but it's DEFINITELY something of which to be aware.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

chris harris
speech impediment
Posts: 4270
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
Location: Norman, OK
Contact:

Post by chris harris » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:36 am

cgarges wrote:
MoreSpaceEcho wrote:also i think that if you're doing parallel drum stuff, a hipass on the parallel can do weird things with the phase, which will not be your friend when you go to combine it with the dry tracks. maybe i'm nuts, i dunno.
A high-pass or a low-pass filter on ANYTHING in parallel will mess with the phase. This applies to compression, distortion, reverb, whatever. Sometimes you can use this to your advantage, but it's DEFINITELY something of which to be aware.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
Is this if the actual parallel bus is high-passed? Or, if the tracks being sent to the parallel bus are high-passed? Or, both?

thethingwiththestuff
george martin
Posts: 1296
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:00 pm
Location: philly

Post by thethingwiththestuff » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:40 am

I agree. I always mix with my sub in. I hi pass like crazy at my live sound job, but only when necessary when mixing. Then I'm much more likely to carve out low mids than kill all bass & sub bass.

MoreSpaceEcho
zen recordist
Posts: 6687
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am

Post by MoreSpaceEcho » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:42 am

subatomic, i'm saying if you're combining the hipassed parallel with non hipassed dry tracks, in my experience it can get weird.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests