Field Recording Mic Recommendations?
-
- pushin' record
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 5:02 pm
- Location: San Diego
- Contact:
Field Recording Mic Recommendations?
I'm looking to go out and do some ambient recordings of natural and urban surroundings. I've got a Zoom H4N, and I'm looking for some recommendations for decent microphones that might be suited to this task. I plan on experimenting with XY, ORTF, and binaural setups. What do you think? Small diaphragm condensers? Specific recommendations welcome.
Bob Mayo on the keyboards...Bob Mayo
http://www.theprofessorslounge.com
http://www.myspace.com/theprofessorslounge
http://www.theprofessorslounge.com
http://www.myspace.com/theprofessorslounge
- I'm Painting Again
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:15 am
- Location: New York, New York
- Contact:
one thing is that a true binaural recording involves a dummy head, etc.
Some of the mics we use for location sound for film and TV are
Sennheiser MKH's , Schoeps cmit-5u , Sanken CS-3e, the Neumann KMR81i and KM185
these are some of the standards and they might be too pricey to buy for personal use..they are all SDC IIRC..reporters do use different mics for interviews like the re-50 or the very specialized Coles 4104PTT ribbon..but this does not seem to be your application..
once outside there are a bunch of things to deal with like, of course, WIND
I was taking a cassette recorder out with a dynamic to do similar things a few years ago because it sounded really cool..so there are no rules to what you can use..
also don't sleep on an M/S setup..like you know..a figure of 8 and an cardioid in the center (or hyper-cardioid)..this can be more forgiving and more versatile a way to make stereo recordings..
Some of the mics we use for location sound for film and TV are
Sennheiser MKH's , Schoeps cmit-5u , Sanken CS-3e, the Neumann KMR81i and KM185
these are some of the standards and they might be too pricey to buy for personal use..they are all SDC IIRC..reporters do use different mics for interviews like the re-50 or the very specialized Coles 4104PTT ribbon..but this does not seem to be your application..
once outside there are a bunch of things to deal with like, of course, WIND
I was taking a cassette recorder out with a dynamic to do similar things a few years ago because it sounded really cool..so there are no rules to what you can use..
also don't sleep on an M/S setup..like you know..a figure of 8 and an cardioid in the center (or hyper-cardioid)..this can be more forgiving and more versatile a way to make stereo recordings..
-
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:19 am
- Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
- Contact:
I use a Tascam DR-70D with four AKG 460 mics, I have different capsules. It's an excellent field recorder, quiet, 48 volt phantom, 4 high pass filter settings, M/S matrix, limiters, the works. It also has built in mics.
$299 from B+H. It's like a poor man's SD744 for 1/10th the price.
$299 from B+H. It's like a poor man's SD744 for 1/10th the price.
Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Audio Upgrades
-
- pushin' record
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 5:02 pm
- Location: San Diego
- Contact:
Thanks for the replies everybody. I will investigate these options.
I think the built in mics are great for pretty much everything. I am just wondering if there are better options out there. I am very happy with the H4N.JWL wrote:What's wrong with the mics built in to the zoom?
Bob Mayo on the keyboards...Bob Mayo
http://www.theprofessorslounge.com
http://www.myspace.com/theprofessorslounge
http://www.theprofessorslounge.com
http://www.myspace.com/theprofessorslounge
I agree. For field recordings, ie, tromping through nature, I can't imagine the extra encumbrance of additional equipment to be worth it in terms of sound quality improvement.Professor T wrote:I think the built in mics are great for pretty much everything. I am just wondering if there are better options out there. I am very happy with the H4N.JWL wrote:What's wrong with the mics built in to the zoom?
-
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:19 am
- Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
- Contact:
You might think so until you use world class mics and hear what you've been missing. An AKG, Schoeps or KM will crap all over those cheapo built in mics. There is a reason people pay so much $ for those things. Add a windsock and go.
A stereo pair can be mounted on a bar and easily carried. I use mine on a Cannon DSLR for HD video with 24 bit 96K audio tracks.
A stereo pair can be mounted on a bar and easily carried. I use mine on a Cannon DSLR for HD video with 24 bit 96K audio tracks.
Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Audio Upgrades
- I'm Painting Again
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:15 am
- Location: New York, New York
- Contact:
Professor T wrote:Thanks for the replies everybody. I will investigate these options.
I think the built in mics are great for pretty much everything. I am just wondering if there are better options out there. I am very happy with the H4N.JWL wrote:What's wrong with the mics built in to the zoom?
there aren't really better options..just different..
you can buy a portable sound kit for as much as a honda civic if you like..it will be more high fidelity and have more features, etc. than the H4 and its built in mics..
check out the Nagra reel to reels they're some of the most beautiful sounding tape machines (to me) ever made and you can wear em on your shoulder..
- tonewoods
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:48 pm
- Location: Orcas Island, WA
- Contact:
Re: Field Recording Mic Recommendations?
I like that machine, and it is indeed handy to have the option of recording with both the onboard mics and whatever mic you choose, and compare them later....Professor T wrote:I've got a Zoom H4N...
I've successfully used a Rode NT4 with the H4...
For binaural, I've used one of these...
Kinda fun...
"You see, the whole thing about recording is the attempt at verisimilitude--not truth, but the appearance of truth."
Jerry Wexler
Jerry Wexler
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
I used to use one of these. I got some great recordings with it. I'm currently using the Audio-Technica BP4025. I find it a little thick in the low mids sometimes but overall it's cool.hogfish wrote:Shure VP88 single point stereo mic. Not expensive on the used market. Does MS. Has 3 stereo width settings. Can be powered by batteries. Sounds great. Makes getting stereo field recordings much easier. Get a windscreen.......
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
I imagine they probably would sound better, but I would question whether it's "enough" better to justify the extra zero(es) in the budget, the fragility of the mics (carrying in urban areas or through nature).Jim Williams wrote:You might think so until you use world class mics and hear what you've been missing. An AKG, Schoeps or KM will crap all over those cheapo built in mics. There is a reason people pay so much $ for those things. Add a windsock and go.
A stereo pair can be mounted on a bar and easily carried. I use mine on a Cannon DSLR for HD video with 24 bit 96K audio tracks.
For field recordings, convenience is huge, and with units like the zooms you can be up and recording in about a second.
And I bet with some post processing, you could manipulate the sound such that it would be difficult to tell which were the zoom mics and which were the Schoeps etc.
Please don't get me wrong, I love great mics and gear, but for field recordings in the budgets most of us are working with.... just don't think it's needed.
- Gregg Juke
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
- Contact:
Yes, I would agree with JWL from the convenience aspect, as well as the cost vs. benefit ratio aspect, i.e. how much do you have to spend to markedly improve sound quality and yet still have something rugged enough to take environmental conditions?
It depends on where you plan on going, but you could be dealing with rain, dew, frost, very hot or frigid temps, lots of dirt or sand, etc., etc. Then you might need a boom pole, a special shock mount, extra cable, possibly phantom power (does the H4N have that?), a "dead cat," and a "blimp" type cover and maybe even a rain guard or umbrella.
I took the Zoom H1 to Africa with a pistol grip and some headphones and it was fine. If all you need is stereo ambience or sound effects, and you're not looking for a shotgun to pick-up dialogue, I'd say go internal. Quick set-up, quick take-down, and it will sound fine.
GJ
It depends on where you plan on going, but you could be dealing with rain, dew, frost, very hot or frigid temps, lots of dirt or sand, etc., etc. Then you might need a boom pole, a special shock mount, extra cable, possibly phantom power (does the H4N have that?), a "dead cat," and a "blimp" type cover and maybe even a rain guard or umbrella.
I took the Zoom H1 to Africa with a pistol grip and some headphones and it was fine. If all you need is stereo ambience or sound effects, and you're not looking for a shotgun to pick-up dialogue, I'd say go internal. Quick set-up, quick take-down, and it will sound fine.
GJ
Gregg Juke
Nocturnal Productions Music Group
Drum! Magazine Contributor
http://MightyNoStars.com
"He's about to learn the most important lesson in the music business-- 'Never trust people in the music business.' "
Nocturnal Productions Music Group
Drum! Magazine Contributor
http://MightyNoStars.com
"He's about to learn the most important lesson in the music business-- 'Never trust people in the music business.' "
- ott0bot
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2023
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:54 pm
- Location: Downtown Phoenix
for quality field recordings it's all about the noise floor. those Zoom units do a nice job, but the headroom on those guys aren't that great. for louder sources they are fine, a bit thin and bass inacccurate for my taste. a pair of transformerless omni's kill in this scenario. really, and decent omni mic will do. I love the OktAva modded mc012's because they are already pretty gain heavy and you can pad them for louder sources. had great success with afformentioned akg's but also with cheaper stuff like Studio Projects c4's as well.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 190 guests