What things have you learned recently?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
qball
pushin' record
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 6:05 am
Location: Central NY

Post by qball » Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:59 pm

Would this work for monitoring the tracking levels (to keep them at -18dBFS)?
http://www.smproaudio.com/VU8.htm
I think women should leave the toilet seat UP!!!

User avatar
Kasey
pushin' record
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:48 pm

Post by Kasey » Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:31 pm

i guess thats the point of that but you really don't need it. just keep your levels around -18dBFS... why spend money on that other than to make you feel better about it after being used to recording as hot as possible without clipping?

User avatar
liftyrfists
gettin' sounds
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:22 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post by liftyrfists » Tue Jun 05, 2007 2:53 am

adam wrote:Yeah, great thread - what a great way to learn. Not recent revelations, but some significant ones...

- Mixing at low volume is a good thing
- Patchbays are built by angels
- My decision to switch to Pro Tools was a good one (for me)
- Good cable makes a difference
- Delay is more useful than reverb
- Silvertone amps are incredible to record
- Don't sweat sample rates and bit depths
- A well place Radioshack mic is better than any poorly placed mic
- Don't ever sell anything unless its just shit

Adam
As far as #1 goes...does that mean you can track at a higher volume, but ultimately make-sure everything's output is lower so that the fine person mastering the thing has more head-room to work with?

Not very far into this whole "recording" thing, so still some questions about it...which makes sense. So can it go in high? Or should it go in low as well? I had thought you wanted the loudest parts of what you're playing to just barely scrape against the red, but never going over it of course; finding that gentle and fine balance.

Help!

qball
pushin' record
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 6:05 am
Location: Central NY

Post by qball » Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:29 am

Kasey wrote:i guess thats the point of that but you really don't need it. just keep your levels around -18dBFS... why spend money on that other than to make you feel better about it after being used to recording as hot as possible without clipping?
I know what "dBvu" is, but I just can't figure out what "DbFS" is. Please, oh please help me! :?
I think women should leave the toilet seat UP!!!

???????
resurrected
Posts: 2383
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:15 pm

Post by ??????? » Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:43 am

liftyrfists wrote:
adam wrote:Yeah, great thread - what a great way to learn. Not recent revelations, but some significant ones...

- Mixing at low volume is a good thing
- Patchbays are built by angels
- My decision to switch to Pro Tools was a good one (for me)
- Good cable makes a difference
- Delay is more useful than reverb
- Silvertone amps are incredible to record
- Don't sweat sample rates and bit depths
- A well place Radioshack mic is better than any poorly placed mic
- Don't ever sell anything unless its just shit

Adam
As far as #1 goes...does that mean you can track at a higher volume, but ultimately make-sure everything's output is lower so that the fine person mastering the thing has more head-room to work with?

Not very far into this whole "recording" thing, so still some questions about it...which makes sense. So can it go in high? Or should it go in low as well? I had thought you wanted the loudest parts of what you're playing to just barely scrape against the red, but never going over it of course; finding that gentle and fine balance.

Help!
I think he might mean "don't blast your monitors and wear your ears out."

Everything sounds pretty good cranked up. Making sure the mix sounds great at a low volume (that there is vocal intelligibility if that's what you are going for, that you can hear all the instruments, etc) is pretty helpful. And it doesn't wear your ears out.

User avatar
bantam
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 480
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 3:55 pm
Location: boston MA
Contact:

Post by bantam » Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:44 am

dBFS = dB Full Scale, it is relative to the max that a digitial converter can theoretically handle.

in practice shoot for -12 to -18

knobtwirler
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:18 pm
Location: NYC

Post by knobtwirler » Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:56 am

Poorly recorded great songs make the gear either invisible or even cooler than they were before the great song was recorded. Amazingly recorded crappy music isn't worth its weight in commercially distributed CDs. Oh, and Matt Pinnfield knows everbody who ever recorded anything anywhere, and thinks everyone is cool and has done incredible things.

User avatar
Kasey
pushin' record
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:48 pm

Post by Kasey » Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:41 am

liftyrfists wrote: Not very far into this whole "recording" thing, so still some questions about it...which makes sense. So can it go in high? Or should it go in low as well? I had thought you wanted the loudest parts of what you're playing to just barely scrape against the red, but never going over it of course; finding that gentle and fine balance.

Help!
no! that's what we're talking about. you should not be trying to 'scrape against the red'. You're destroying headroom by doing this. headroom is your friend.

really, it's not as complex as it sounds in practice. Just keep your input levels on digital gear around -18dBFS. Just do it. you'll be thankful come mix down.

On some digital meters, such as ADAT's, the color of the meter bars change from green to yellow or orange around -18dBFS. This is why. Keep most of your signal green.

The loudest parts will vary, but peaks should still stay around -12 dBFS.

mjau
speech impediment
Posts: 4034
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Post by mjau » Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:01 am

Couple of things I've learned recently:

I can't sing, and never will be able to. I'm all 400 Hz and 3k.
I tend to err on the side of overly dark, versus overly bright.
Purple Audio makes amazing preamps.
Bass DI is sometimes all that's needed.
Compression is a choice, not a matter of practice.
Same with reverb.
Don't be afraid to use tons of reverb, or none at all.
Effectrons are the greatest piece of gear, ever.

User avatar
Jeff White
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3263
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jeff White » Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:16 am

qball wrote:Would this work for monitoring the tracking levels (to keep them at -18dBFS)?
http://www.smproaudio.com/VU8.htm
If you record on a computer use...

FreeG

or...

PSP Vintage Meter

What I do... I usually set up an Aux track for monitoring my input, set the plug-ins on that Aux track in Digital Performer for pre-fader, and turn the fader on the Aux track to zero (So I don't hear latency). I use FreeG and keep the RMS between -12dB and -18dB, and watch my peaks as well. I'll compress if my source material is peaky and needs to be tamed a bit.

Jeff

User avatar
liftyrfists
gettin' sounds
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:22 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post by liftyrfists » Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:01 am

Kasey wrote:
liftyrfists wrote: Not very far into this whole "recording" thing, so still some questions about it...which makes sense. So can it go in high? Or should it go in low as well? I had thought you wanted the loudest parts of what you're playing to just barely scrape against the red, but never going over it of course; finding that gentle and fine balance.

Help!
no! that's what we're talking about. you should not be trying to 'scrape against the red'. You're destroying headroom by doing this. headroom is your friend.

really, it's not as complex as it sounds in practice. Just keep your input levels on digital gear around -18dBFS. Just do it. you'll be thankful come mix down.

On some digital meters, such as ADAT's, the color of the meter bars change from green to yellow or orange around -18dBFS. This is why. Keep most of your signal green.

The loudest parts will vary, but peaks should still stay around -12 dBFS.
Isn't that 'make your loudest parts go into the red slightly' mantra something that is advocated in manufacturers guides? I feel like the manual for my lexicon omega stated something like that, which is why I do it! Ah: bastards, haha.

So ok ok, when looking at the actual sound file on my computer and when comparing the input levels on the input box it seems like it peaks really quickly on the box, but on the sound file there is still a ton of room between the highest peaks of the digital approximation and the physical cut-off at the top. Is this what you're talking about as far as there being a kind of built in thing to maximize headroom as far as digital goes?

I've been wondering about that for a while now: my input seems to be flirting with yellow at it's highest points, never consistently in the yellow and certainly never in red, but the sound files look rather tame and are nowhere near what those levels would look like visually (it seems like they'd be close to literally clipping)...

However, when I put some songs into the multitrack (for radio commercials and what-not) the levels are always right up there; is that a result of the mastering utilizing head-room and pushing things up? I guess that's compression...just the high parts though, I tend to look for dynamic in the things I listen to and force on other people :P

And having said this would it be a good rule of thumb to always "round down" as opposed to "rounding up" when talking about volume in mixing?

Just curious...obviously a student on this end! Thanks for the help...and great thread by the way!

mcRack
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 5:29 pm
Location: europe

Post by mcRack » Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:16 pm

I`m confused !!
I have a m-audio delta 1010 card and i cant get the meters on it down to
-18 dbfs (-6 dbfs is the lowest signal i can get when recording drums). The problem is that the gain volume on my outboard mixer channels is turned all the way down(i`m using the channel inserts i/o as direct out).
The 1010 card comes with input faders for each channel but these only affect the
input to logic(post converting A/D ) . I have no problem recording at -18dbfs in logic but as i see it the signal is already converted too hot.....or...ehhhhh
Help me out guys...

Sorry for my broken English....peace
only time `ll help,it`s a pain in the ... right now but, i know i`ll get there soon enough :)

User avatar
Kasey
pushin' record
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:48 pm

Post by Kasey » Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:11 am

liftyrfists wrote: However, when I put some songs into the multitrack (for radio commercials and what-not) the levels are always right up there; is that a result of the mastering utilizing head-room and pushing things up? I guess that's compression...just the high parts though, I tend to look for dynamic in the things I listen to and force on other people :P

And having said this would it be a good rule of thumb to always "round down" as opposed to "rounding up" when talking about volume in mixing?
yes and yes

knobtwirler
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:18 pm
Location: NYC

Post by knobtwirler » Wed Jun 06, 2007 11:40 am

mcRack wrote:I`m confused !!
I have a m-audio delta 1010 card and i cant get the meters on it down to
-18 dbfs (-6 dbfs is the lowest signal i can get when recording drums).
That can't be right. -18 is where generally 0 vu sits on an analog averaging meter. You mean that everything you meter is above that? How can this be?

mcRack
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 5:29 pm
Location: europe

Post by mcRack » Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:15 pm

knobtwirler wrote:
mcRack wrote:I`m confused !!
I have a m-audio delta 1010 card and i cant get the meters on it down to
-18 dbfs (-6 dbfs is the lowest signal i can get when recording drums).
That can't be right. -18 is where generally 0 vu sits on an analog averaging meter. You mean that everything you meter is above that? How can this be?
That`S exactly what i`m talking about,i don`t get it either !
O dbvu= -18 dbfs
In my case 0 dbvu seems to be -6 dbfs.....hmmm I need to do some more reading about my soundcard
only time `ll help,it`s a pain in the ... right now but, i know i`ll get there soon enough :)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests