Weak snare sound ( i know we've all encountered this )

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

User avatar
bannerj
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 3:40 pm
Location: Holland, MI
Contact:

Post by bannerj » Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:56 am

yeah, don't panic about having this to show other people either. let it be what it is: the project you are doing now--not the one you wish you were doing later.

Dubious
gettin' sounds
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:21 am
Location: Dartmouth Nova Scotia, Canada

Post by Dubious » Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:10 pm

man im listening to this prince bootleg right now... prince is in RIDICULOUS full on guitar shred mode.. live in the studio with just bass and drums.. the band is mad kicking but the drummer has got the WORST piccolo snare sound.. no grit to it whatsoever.. they need to ban those things.

User avatar
billiamwalker
pushin' record
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by billiamwalker » Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:20 pm

Jeff Robinson wrote:9 times out of 10 the direct, close-miked sound sucks anyway. What's it like in the room mics or the kit mics?
agreed with the close miking, but like i said the snare sounds pretty good through the overhead mics, but the snare is barely audible while the whole kit is being used. (another downside to over tightening = less volumeof snare)

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:01 pm

Dubious wrote: the drummer has got the WORST piccolo snare sound.. no grit to it whatsoever.. they need to ban those things.
Nah, like anything else they just have to use it at the right time. That clearly wasn't it.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

User avatar
digitaldrummer
cryogenically thawing
Posts: 3548
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:51 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Post by digitaldrummer » Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:25 pm

Like drumsound said, try re-tuning also. The snare in this clip is a Pearl free-floating brass piccolo (3.5 x 14) with a standard Remo ambassador on top.

http://www.digitaldrummer.net/samples/jcge.mp3

If i wasn't there playing it, I would've swore it was a 6.5x14. I just tuned it down and then it was likely EQ'ed too. I don't remmeber much about this session cause it was 10-15 years ago. I think it was 57 on top and bottom but don't remember anything about the signal chain except it was 2" tape. Anyway, proof that the drum could be tuned to get something other than *poink*.

Mike

dirtdog
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: Twin Cities

Post by dirtdog » Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:47 pm

billiamwalker wrote:And it's making things also difficult because if a customer wants to hear the last project i've done and the snare sucks then they're going to be liek" i hate that snare sound" and they're going to think that sound will apply to them until i explain to them more indepth things.
The band paying you is the customer. Are they paying you to record them how they want to sound or are they paying you to build your demo reel?

That said, having another snare available to try or reamping for more snare sound are great things to try.

Dave Nutz
pushin' record
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 5:00 am
Location: NYC

Post by Dave Nutz » Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:20 pm

if you are stuck with the currently recorded snare, mults and insane processing might be your best bet if you dont want to replace the sound.

for instance, try one mult with daisy chained compressors, another with some crazy bandpass EQ(perhaps something telephone-esque), and another with some distortion
01010100 01100001 01101011 01100101 00100000 01001101 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01101100 01100101 01100001 01100100 01100101 01110010 00100001

User avatar
@?,*???&?
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5804
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Just left on the FM dial
Contact:

Post by @?,*???&? » Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:18 pm

billiamwalker wrote:
Jeff Robinson wrote:9 times out of 10 the direct, close-miked sound sucks anyway. What's it like in the room mics or the kit mics?
agreed with the close miking, but like i said the snare sounds pretty good through the overhead mics, but the snare is barely audible while the whole kit is being used. (another downside to over tightening = less volumeof snare)
Aha! An epiphany. You sir are a candidate for the wonderful world of the digital drum nudge.

In mic'ing a kit like this, 1' = 1ms of delay. With your overheads on, start engaging a short delay on the snare drum track and bring that up against the O/H tracks. Start with a setting of like .05ms and then start nudging up in .03 increments from there. Make sure your delay is set on 100% wet. Don't go past 1ms. Somewhere in there, you're going to increase the beef of the snare. If the drum disappears when all the other mics are in, then you've got some serious phase cancellation and comb filtering happening. Slight nudging and changing those distance relationships in this fashion can tighten up your kit. It won't always be the best solution and sometimes you'll have to let go of some other instrument, but it can improve what you've got.

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7504
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:21 am

billiamwalker wrote:
Jeff Robinson wrote:9 times out of 10 the direct, close-miked sound sucks anyway. What's it like in the room mics or the kit mics?
agreed with the close miking, but like i said the snare sounds pretty good through the overhead mics, but the snare is barely audible while the whole kit is being used. (another downside to over tightening = less volumeof snare)
Maybe try a mult of the room or OH with a lot of EQ to just pull out the SD tone. I tend to think of the Oh are Room for tone and the close SD mic adds presence and impact.

I also think the general tone of the SD defines the drum-set and thus is quite important.

permanent hearing damage
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:55 pm
Location: philly
Contact:

Post by permanent hearing damage » Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:35 pm

have you tried distorting the snare at all? i find that helps out pretty often

User avatar
billiamwalker
pushin' record
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by billiamwalker » Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:08 pm

permanent hearing damage wrote:have you tried distorting the snare at all? i find that helps out pretty often
i have not tried that. i've never even considered it or would have thought of it. i'll try it and see if i can pull through with better results

User avatar
Electro-Voice 664
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 745
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 8:48 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Post by Electro-Voice 664 » Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:46 pm

Last weekend I repaired a weak snare track, here's what I did:
Reamped the snare track through an amp (lying on its back) with a snare upsidedown on the grille. Put a R121 up and recorded that. While mixing, the new snare "bottom" was helpful, but I still needed more. I used the preset distortion in an SPX900 and it came together.
The added distortion helped the energy of the whole song.
I tried things read here and they worked!
Thanks everyone.
"Play ethnicky jazz to parade your snazz. On your five grand stereo."

stui
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 6:37 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by stui » Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:32 am

I might be wrong but I don't think anyone has mentioned phase yet??
If my close mic sound detracts from my overheads or room mics I'll go back to the close mic and adjust so that it actually reinforces the other mics.
"when in doubt leave it out"

User avatar
billiamwalker
pushin' record
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by billiamwalker » Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:37 am

wintershed wrote:Last weekend I repaired a weak snare track, here's what I did:
Reamped the snare track through an amp (lying on its back) with a snare upsidedown on the grille. Put a R121 up and recorded that. While mixing, the new snare "bottom" was helpful, but I still needed more. I used the preset distortion in an SPX900 and it came together.
The added distortion helped the energy of the whole song.
I tried things read here and they worked!
Thanks everyone.

ohhh luckyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. i have an R121 poster hanging above my bed.


ok not really but i really want one. im brokeded white boy.

User avatar
tintern
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 11:05 am
Location: central mass.
Contact:

Post by tintern » Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:19 am

ungh. i think top heads tuned within an inch of their life has been my main pet peeve for about 6 months, soon to be replaced though by bassists who play with sub-freq. EQ/FX cranked.

frankly, don't be afraid to re-tune the drums. i have it sort of easier in that i play drums so when i tell a drummer that he really should re-tune for a better sound, it's a drummer not some studio guy telling them - and usually i can just do it for them which helps too. the problem of course is a drastic re-tuning is going to whack his playing style out but eh... i'm sick of turd polishing. no more.

distortion can help but will only sound right if it's a really rocking song - on mellower songs it'll be weird in my experience. boosting it around 100hz or so is about the only thing that will definitely help, tricky of course but it will. the time-aligning thing is also helpful though i've never been able to get it to decrease the pinginess of the snare.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests