SM57 Mod

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

User avatar
A-Barr
tinnitus
Posts: 1010
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:27 pm

Post by A-Barr » Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:15 pm

I know I've posted the hell out of this thread but here goes..
I was told that once you get the transformer out of the sm57 its pretty much a sennhiser 421
I'd love to hear some opinions on the sonic differences between the two. This seems pretty crazy to me, if Shure could make an 80 dollar mic sound like a 350 dollar mic by actually using fewer parts, I'd think they would have figured that out. Although maybe that's what the SM7 is, that and the 57 and 58 are all based on the Unidyne III capsule, according to their site. Anyone have all 3 and feel like doing a comparison?

...Please??

User avatar
A-Barr
tinnitus
Posts: 1010
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:27 pm

Post by A-Barr » Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:19 pm

OK... one more!
The SM7B does is in fact transformerless! Though it does have a humbucking coil.

User avatar
RodC
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2039
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 8:53 pm
Location: Right outside the door
Contact:

Post by RodC » Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:33 pm

I have always thought the difference we hear between the 57 and the 545 is the transformer. The 545 and most like it have a tranny with 2 taps, sooo... you know they have to sound different.
'Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones'

http://www.beyondsanityproductions.com
http://www.myspace.com/beyondsanity

User avatar
valverec
gettin' sounds
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:45 pm

Post by valverec » Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:20 am

Okay, so it sounds different. Does it sound good though?

User avatar
bayoucables
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Post by bayoucables » Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:58 am

Yes, it sounds better. More lows, more highs, and less honk.
http://www.bayoucables.com - custom cables, tubes, bass wiring and parts, and more

http://www.bayoucables.com/altec/ - altec info page

User avatar
bayoucables
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Post by bayoucables » Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:15 pm

I remoted the transformer so that it could be put back if needed. I have all this on the Altec info page linked in my sig as well.

Here it is:
After taking it apart and cutting the wires at the capsule and jack, heating the mic body with a heat gun will soften the hot glue and a tug on the wires will pull it out. The glue is easy to take off the transformer while it's still warm.
Image
Image
I wanted to remote the transformer in case I needed the mic to sound like it originally did or if I needed the extra gain back. I shielded it with some sticky back copper foil. I left the paper on so that it would act as an insulator and soldered the cable ground leads on the copper side. Be sure to note which of the leads is for + and - before cutting the leads. On all four of my mics, green was positive at the capsule and blue was hot at the jack. FYI pin two of XLR mic cable connectors is hot(+), pin 3 is cold(-), and pin 1 is ground.
Image
Image
Image
Last edited by bayoucables on Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.bayoucables.com - custom cables, tubes, bass wiring and parts, and more

http://www.bayoucables.com/altec/ - altec info page

User avatar
jonmatifa
audio school graduate
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:20 am
Location: SLC, UT

Post by jonmatifa » Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:25 am

Yeah, I like the idea of keeping the transformer, plus it also brings the interesting idea of using it on mics its not supposed to be used on. I think I want to take the transformer and put it into a box and put a Pot on it so I can dial in the amount of transformer and non-transformer signal, see if anything useful comes out of that.

User avatar
weatherbox
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 774
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:59 am
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Post by weatherbox » Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:32 am

jonmatifa wrote:Yeah, I like the idea of keeping the transformer, plus it also brings the interesting idea of using it on mics its not supposed to be used on. I think I want to take the transformer and put it into a box and put a Pot on it so I can dial in the amount of transformer and non-transformer signal, see if anything useful comes out of that.
cool idea. let us know what happens.

pedalboy
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:07 pm
Location: Chicago/St. Louis
Contact:

Post by pedalboy » Sat Apr 22, 2006 6:19 pm

hey i'm doing the mod RIGHT NOW... but either the directions for the grounding are unclear or i'm just not getting it... Do you just run the TWO wires from + and - on the capsule to pins two and three, and leave pin 1 alone? that APPEARS to be how it is on the original sm57 but it seems odd to me... help if you're out there.

pedalboy
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:07 pm
Location: Chicago/St. Louis
Contact:

Post by pedalboy » Sun Apr 23, 2006 12:46 pm

I just completed my 57 mod yesterday... Here's some feedback.

First off, the article says that there's supposed to be three wires going to the capsule. Mine only has two, positive and negative.... Anyone else run into this? It looks like from the picture in the article that the mic in the pic only has two as well...

I also decided to sand off all the grey paint on the foreward part of the mic instead of painting it... it looks sweeeeet but its a pain in the butt, and i think i'm getting black lung from doing it. all that really fine black powder in the air can't be good. not necessarily a recommended option, but your 57 sorta ends up looking like luke skywalker's lightsaber, so that's pretty cool, i guess.

And yeah, less honk. Did an A/B on voice with a regular 57, and the regular 57 sounded like it had a low-pass filter on by comparison. Here's a pic:

Image

Yosh
ass engineer
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Yosh » Wed May 03, 2006 9:21 am

This mod looks really cool, but I don't think I'm ever going to get the current issue (#52). Somehow it must have been lost in the mail or something. I know this might be a lot to ask, but does anyone have access to a scanner so that they could post a url to a pdf of the article with the mod, so I could do it as well? Or maybe just the key instructions, and I can make sense of the rest myself. Thanks!

-Josh

User avatar
bayoucables
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Post by bayoucables » Wed May 03, 2006 9:53 am

This should be everything you need:

1. Unscrew the capsule and connector and cut the wires.
2. Heat the body of the mic with a heat gun, hair dryer, or boil in water.
3. Once the hot glue is loose, pull on the wires to remove the transformer.
4. Add two wires, one from + on the capsule to pin 2 on the connector, and one from - on the capsule to pin 3 on the connector.
http://www.bayoucables.com - custom cables, tubes, bass wiring and parts, and more

http://www.bayoucables.com/altec/ - altec info page

Yosh
ass engineer
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Yosh » Wed May 03, 2006 12:09 pm

Wow, that easy. Thanks!

-Josh

gutsofgold
pushin' record
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:38 pm

Post by gutsofgold » Tue May 16, 2006 8:02 am

I just did this to an sm58 and its decently quieter. I compensated by upping the trim on my pre's and it just seems to have a weaker pick up to it. After upping the input gain and normalising recording, it is a far broader sound with smoother lows and I guess you could say subtler mids.

User avatar
mingus2112
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 710
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:53 am
Location: New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by mingus2112 » Tue May 16, 2006 8:14 am

gutsofgold wrote:I just did this to an sm58 and its decently quieter. I compensated by upping the trim on my pre's and it just seems to have a weaker pick up to it. After upping the input gain and normalising recording, it is a far broader sound with smoother lows and I guess you could say subtler mids.
I was wondering when someone was going to try this! I've only got 2 SM57s so i don't want to trash one for the sake of science. I've got 5 SM58s though. . .so trash 'em!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests