cymbal bleed in vocal mic is killing my drumsound!

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
User avatar
kdownes
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: college park, md
Contact:

cymbal bleed in vocal mic is killing my drumsound!

Post by kdownes » Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:25 am

so i set up for a jazz session this week, really easy quintet, all live, no over dubs. got all the instruments sounding good before the singer arrived. set up a vocal mic (mouse>la610) and set some average levels to judge the amount of bleed that i would be getting. i moved the mic around a bit to make use of the rejection point then waited for the vocalist to arrive. come to find out, she has the softest voice (though very nice) that i have ever heard. i literally had to crank the preamp all the way up! now i have a vocal track with tons of cymbal bleed in it. when i mute the vocal i really like the drum sound, but as soon as i drop it back in it turns into a washy mess.

any ideas on how to remedy this? drastic eq?

Stephen B.
gettin' sounds
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 11:39 am

Post by Stephen B. » Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:56 am

In my experience there is really nothing that will work completely. You could try gating the vocal some, but if the cymbals are as loud as you say in it, it would probably be too obvious when there is singing. Drastic eq probably wouldn't work either, as most of the cymbals will live in the same range as the nice airy part of a female vocal.

Is retracking the vocal not an option? I know it would not be nearly as cool as all tracked live, but it may be the best way to go. Look at the bright side: if she really is as quiet as you say, you probably won't have a ghost vocal to worry about...
"Badness is only spoiled goodness."

C.S. Lewis

bluesman
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 681
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 9:01 am
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas

Post by bluesman » Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:04 am

I think a Dynamic mic would help in a recording situation like this. I find that dynamics hear less of the room & are much less fizzy. I recently recorded a blues band with a singing drummer. I put an SM58 in the drum booth for the drummer's scratch vocals. The scratch vocals turned out so good we keept them all & the drums sounded great. This guy wasn't a particularly strong vocalist either.
Another thing to consider is low passing the vocals to take some of the drum/cymbal bite out of the vocal track. This can work well & eliminates much of the need to de-esss. I would probably compress the vocal to bring it more forward & then low pass to taste. Try it, you'll like it!

good luck!
"The digital future sucks the boils off my white ass." McHugh

User avatar
RodC
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2039
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 8:53 pm
Location: Right outside the door
Contact:

Post by RodC » Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:18 am

bluesman wrote:I think a Dynamic mic would help in a recording situation like this. I find that dynamics hear less of the room & are much less fizzy. I recently recorded a blues band with a singing drummer. I put an SM58 in the drum booth for the drummer's scratch vocals. The scratch vocals turned out so good we keept them all & the drums sounded great. This guy wasn't a particularly strong vocalist either.
Another thing to consider is low passing the vocals to take some of the drum/cymbal bite out of the vocal track. This can work well & eliminates much of the need to de-esss. I would probably compress the vocal to bring it more forward & then low pass to taste. Try it, you'll like it!

good luck!
I agree, 2 things often over looked, ppl look at what is in front of the singer (Back of Mic) for rejection and often ignore what is behind the singer. This is where a lot of your problem can come from, make sure there is some high absorbing material BEHIND the singer, not a cement wall or a window. If you dont have foam look around for something soft in the room.

Also a small pannel 3 or 4 ft in front of the singer with some absorbing material on it can help.

Also is she monitoring with headphones? If that mix is not right they wont project.
'Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones'

http://www.beyondsanityproductions.com
http://www.myspace.com/beyondsanity

Rigsby
mixes from purgatory
Posts: 2908
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 12:34 am
Location: London, England
Contact:

Post by Rigsby » Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:51 am

Female vocalist though, it's going to ruin her sound if you low pass. Gating could work but yeah, it's going to sound wierd if she's very quiet and the cymbals hit in everytime she sings. I'd re-track if at all possible.
The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away.

rigsbysmith.com

???????
resurrected
Posts: 2383
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:15 pm

Post by ??????? » Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:14 am

Sorry for the bummer. :(
Last edited by ??????? on Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

mjau
speech impediment
Posts: 4034
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Post by mjau » Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:19 am

Not to be pedantic (actually, yeah, I guess I am), but regarding your title - drumsound (one word) is our venerable Tape Op moderator, and I cringe at the thought of vocal bleed actually destroying him. He's my only local source for borrowing at4047's, so let's keep him among the living.

MoreSpaceEcho
zen recordist
Posts: 6687
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am

Post by MoreSpaceEcho » Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:53 am

another vote for retracking if at all possible. everything else is gonna be variations on the shit sandwich.

puls
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 11:18 am

Post by puls » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:17 am

This could be completely whacked, but, what if you took the drum overheads, copy the track, put it out of phase, and try to use that at various levels/eq/high pass/whatever to cancel out the bleed on the vocal track. I've never actually done this, but short of retracking the vocals, that's what i'd try.

jwp
The universe is under no obligation to conform to your beliefs

User avatar
darjama
tinnitus
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: East SF Bay

Post by darjama » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:27 am

what about some noise reduction on the vocals, using a cymbal hit w/o vocal as the noise sample? It might get a little funky, but it's worth a shot. Try it on a small section, running it through a 2-3 times with a low level of noise reduction.

Between noise reduction and some multiband compression and/or EQ, you might be able to lick it.

User avatar
I'm Painting Again
zen recordist
Posts: 7086
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:15 am
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by I'm Painting Again » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:30 am

just talk to the band..say this is the problem..what would you guys like to do about it..we could do over the vocals leave the washy cymbals, etc. etc. etc.

who knows maybe they will like the "washy mess"..people have different tastes..but most importantly be honest and upfront about the problem..work it out with them..both of you should have the same goal to make the best record possible..you live you learn you work hard and try your best and hopefully come off with something of beauty..

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7526
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:36 am

mjau wrote:Not to be pedantic (actually, yeah, I guess I am), but regarding your title - drumsound (one word) is our venerable Tape Op moderator, and I cringe at the thought of vocal bleed actually destroying him. He's my only local source for borrowing at4047's, so let's keep him among the living.
BWAHAHAHAHA!

To the original poster, I agree retracking is probably best. You might want to also consider not using the overheads you recorded and see if you can use the vocal mic as your cymbal mic. It's a long shot but I'd at listen to it...

User avatar
kdownes
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: college park, md
Contact:

Post by kdownes » Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:35 pm

Not to be pedantic (actually, yeah, I guess I am), but regarding your title - drumsound (one word) is our venerable Tape Op moderator, and I cringe at the thought of vocal bleed actually destroying him. He's my only local source for borrowing at4047's, so let's keep him among the living.
i will keep him alive...

for now. :twisted:

thanks for all of the advice. i dont think that retracking is an option. ive tried muting the vocal, but being that it was a very small room and everyone was standing very close, there is still a bit of a ghost vocal. i wouldnt mind, but she never sings the same thing twice.

???????
resurrected
Posts: 2383
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:15 pm

Post by ??????? » Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:15 pm

i think there have been enough ideas here to keep you busy for awhile. Who knows that out of phase overheads thing might be just the ticket. Any of it is worth a try. I bet through some combination of things you can maybe salvage it, or at least put lots of mayo on that shit sandwich.

I agree about listening to the vocal mic as your cymbal mic. You never know!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests