What Version of OS X is Best for Music Producers?
-
- audio school
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:50 am
- Location: United States
What Version of OS X is Best for Music Producers?
I saw this post on Synthtopia & I'm not really sure what to make of it. It's pretty good timing as Apple just announced that they'll be releasing Mountain Lion soon.
http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2012/ ... producers/
I know that it's probably not best practice to update OS upon release, but what do you guys think?.... Is there any validity to the question "What Version of OS X is Best for Music Producers?"
http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2012/ ... producers/
I know that it's probably not best practice to update OS upon release, but what do you guys think?.... Is there any validity to the question "What Version of OS X is Best for Music Producers?"
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:16 pm
- Location: Denver, CO
- Contact:
Impossible to answer, because it depends on the software you want to use. You have to go by the software manufacturer's compatibility list.
Having said that, if you're one major version back, you should be pretty safe. I think just about anything will run on Snow Leopard by now.
It also depends on how you use your computer. If it's just you, and a little downtime isn't going to hurt, then feel free to experiment. If you're dealing with paying customers, though, you need to be way more cautious.
IMO, the only "rule" is that you definitely do NOT want to go straight to a new release the day, week, or even month it comes out. Check with your software vendors, and don't switch until they officially support it.
Having said that, if you're one major version back, you should be pretty safe. I think just about anything will run on Snow Leopard by now.
It also depends on how you use your computer. If it's just you, and a little downtime isn't going to hurt, then feel free to experiment. If you're dealing with paying customers, though, you need to be way more cautious.
IMO, the only "rule" is that you definitely do NOT want to go straight to a new release the day, week, or even month it comes out. Check with your software vendors, and don't switch until they officially support it.
-
- audio school
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:50 am
- Location: United States
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:16 pm
- Location: Denver, CO
- Contact:
I should also mention the other side of the coin: people who cling to very old software because, "hey, it still works".
That may be true, but you might also be missing some really cool and useful features in the newer versions. Even worse, when you're outside of the manufacturer's support window, you won't be able to get help if you ever need it. Everyone stops supporting their old versions at some point.
Like it or not, upgrades are a part of life with digital. You have to find the balance of old vs. new that keeps you up-to-date with useful features, while avoiding the problems of brand new releases. I really think the "one major version back" thing I mentioned earlier is a pretty good rule to follow. By the time you're ready to upgrade, the worst of the bugs should be gone, and you won't be left in the dust on the newer features.
That may be true, but you might also be missing some really cool and useful features in the newer versions. Even worse, when you're outside of the manufacturer's support window, you won't be able to get help if you ever need it. Everyone stops supporting their old versions at some point.
Like it or not, upgrades are a part of life with digital. You have to find the balance of old vs. new that keeps you up-to-date with useful features, while avoiding the problems of brand new releases. I really think the "one major version back" thing I mentioned earlier is a pretty good rule to follow. By the time you're ready to upgrade, the worst of the bugs should be gone, and you won't be left in the dust on the newer features.
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
- Brett Siler
- moves faders with mind
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:16 pm
- Location: Evansville, IN
- Contact:
^:(
I'm in the old digital realm of Pro Tools 6.4 TDM. I haven't come across a circumstance yet that has held me back with it. It still compatible with newer session files, have plenty of plug ins that still rule. Plenty of soft synth that still rule. It plays well with outboard gear too. Nothing has come out digitally that has really convinced to upgrade. Until I have an extra $6000 sitting around and something really really cool happens with digital, I'm good.
John Jeffers wrote:I should also mention the other side of the coin: people who cling to very old software because, "hey, it still works".
That may be true, but you might also be missing some really cool and useful features in the newer versions. Even worse, when you're outside of the manufacturer's support window, you won't be able to get help if you ever need it. Everyone stops supporting their old versions at some point.
Like it or not, upgrades are a part of life with digital. You have to find the balance of old vs. new that keeps you up-to-date with useful features, while avoiding the problems of brand new releases. I really think the "one major version back" thing I mentioned earlier is a pretty good rule to follow. By the time you're ready to upgrade, the worst of the bugs should be gone, and you won't be left in the dust on the newer features.
I'm in the old digital realm of Pro Tools 6.4 TDM. I haven't come across a circumstance yet that has held me back with it. It still compatible with newer session files, have plenty of plug ins that still rule. Plenty of soft synth that still rule. It plays well with outboard gear too. Nothing has come out digitally that has really convinced to upgrade. Until I have an extra $6000 sitting around and something really really cool happens with digital, I'm good.
My musical endeavors!
My Music: http://www.brettsiler.bandcamp.com/
StudioMother Brain Sound Infrastructure
My Music: http://www.brettsiler.bandcamp.com/
StudioMother Brain Sound Infrastructure
- Gregg Juke
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
- Contact:
- Jeff White
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3263
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
I have an old G5 and Powerbook both running OSX 10.4.11 with Digital Performer 4.61, Peak LE, Live 7, NI Komplete 5, tons of other stuff. It all works fine and It's never moving from where it is.
I also run a new MacBook Pro (needed for my graphic design work) running OSX Lion with DP7 and I'm building a similar setup on it. Since upgrading all of the stuff from my G5 to the MBP will cost well over $2000, I've decided to simply keep the old setup humming for now. I'd rather spend cash on analog, real world stuff than software at this point in the game. So instead of upgrading my Waves, Izotope, NI, Ableton, Bias, PSP, etc etc software I've managed to acoustically treat my entire 600 sq ft space, have all of my amps repaired/serviced, add to my monitoring, pick up a few new guitars and bass, buy a Roland Juno 106, add to my mic collection... etc. Sure I'll move everything to my MBP eventually, but I'm way more into hardware that I'll have forever than the newest latest and greatest upgrade that'll break half of my recording software.
Jeff
I also run a new MacBook Pro (needed for my graphic design work) running OSX Lion with DP7 and I'm building a similar setup on it. Since upgrading all of the stuff from my G5 to the MBP will cost well over $2000, I've decided to simply keep the old setup humming for now. I'd rather spend cash on analog, real world stuff than software at this point in the game. So instead of upgrading my Waves, Izotope, NI, Ableton, Bias, PSP, etc etc software I've managed to acoustically treat my entire 600 sq ft space, have all of my amps repaired/serviced, add to my monitoring, pick up a few new guitars and bass, buy a Roland Juno 106, add to my mic collection... etc. Sure I'll move everything to my MBP eventually, but I'm way more into hardware that I'll have forever than the newest latest and greatest upgrade that'll break half of my recording software.
Jeff
I record, mix, and master in my Philly-based home studio, the Spacement. https://linktr.ee/ipressrecord
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:16 pm
- Location: Denver, CO
- Contact:
Actually, no it's not. Pro Tools 10 introduced a new file format (PTX) that's incompatible with earlier versions of Pro Tools. I was reminded of this the hard way when one of my clients took a session we were working on to a video post house. I forgot to "save as" PTF, and they couldn't open the PTX session because they weren't using Pro Tools 10. Needless to say, I felt terrible, and my client lost a few hours of time trying to track down someone in the area with version 10 so they could get the session open. Just something to be aware of.Brett Siler wrote:I'm in the old digital realm of Pro Tools 6.4 TDM...It still compatible with newer session files.
- Brett Siler
- moves faders with mind
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:16 pm
- Location: Evansville, IN
- Contact:
Oh wow, thanks for the heads up! Hopefully I won't have to send sessions to people and can just send the WAV files.
My musical endeavors!
My Music: http://www.brettsiler.bandcamp.com/
StudioMother Brain Sound Infrastructure
My Music: http://www.brettsiler.bandcamp.com/
StudioMother Brain Sound Infrastructure
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 191 guests