ala Lanois (using stage monitors while recording)
ala Lanois (using stage monitors while recording)
I just thought I'd post and ask to see if anyone else is doing this and if you all had any tips or tricks.
I was watching the LeNoise documentary on youtube and came to find out that Lanois is a fan of headphoneless recording, which is awesome because Lanois is awesome and it reaffirms what I already believe.
I've been recording vocals in front of my speakers for awhile now with the volume low and really prefer it to using headphones because pitch and dynamics seem easier for me to understand.
Anyway, I'd like to implement a monitor of some sort, (wedge? I don't know) in the upstairs room in order to do the same thing that I'm doing downstairs in front of my control room monitors so I don't have to use headphones.
I know the phase trick which entails recording another track of nothing while maintaining the same physical position, and then flipping the phase to attempt to cancel out the speaker bleed. (This is a hassle and not necessarily feasible when only using 8 tracks to begin with)
I know that directional mics are my friend.
But I'm looking for any other nuggets of advice concerning how to minimize bleed/phase from the monitor, if anybody can think of any, like perhaps discussion concerning differences in speaker topology? I don't know if it would really make a difference what I monitor on, but then again, maybe I'm overlooking something.
This would be in a fairly small, but A-frame shaped room. Am I courting the impossible?
I was watching the LeNoise documentary on youtube and came to find out that Lanois is a fan of headphoneless recording, which is awesome because Lanois is awesome and it reaffirms what I already believe.
I've been recording vocals in front of my speakers for awhile now with the volume low and really prefer it to using headphones because pitch and dynamics seem easier for me to understand.
Anyway, I'd like to implement a monitor of some sort, (wedge? I don't know) in the upstairs room in order to do the same thing that I'm doing downstairs in front of my control room monitors so I don't have to use headphones.
I know the phase trick which entails recording another track of nothing while maintaining the same physical position, and then flipping the phase to attempt to cancel out the speaker bleed. (This is a hassle and not necessarily feasible when only using 8 tracks to begin with)
I know that directional mics are my friend.
But I'm looking for any other nuggets of advice concerning how to minimize bleed/phase from the monitor, if anybody can think of any, like perhaps discussion concerning differences in speaker topology? I don't know if it would really make a difference what I monitor on, but then again, maybe I'm overlooking something.
This would be in a fairly small, but A-frame shaped room. Am I courting the impossible?
Stilgar, we've got wormsign the likes of which God has never seen!
-
- pushin' record
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:34 am
- Location: Spring Grove, Pennsylvania
Yeah, I have mixed feelings about that these days. In a live setting, people getting in each other's mics can make it sound more alive for sure.
But I've yet to find the situation where bleed from a speaker in a vocal overdub + echo/reverb sounds better than not having that bleed. But I don't know . . .
But I've yet to find the situation where bleed from a speaker in a vocal overdub + echo/reverb sounds better than not having that bleed. But I don't know . . .
Stilgar, we've got wormsign the likes of which God has never seen!
- Marc Alan Goodman
- george martin
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 7:57 pm
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
Just make sure that the bleed sounds good.
If the speaker you're using is distorted or has a strange frequency response you'll hear it.
If you've got spare studio monitors that's the way to go rather than a stage wedge or something. Recording in the control room works well too. At least then you know that the bleed will sound its best.
If the speaker you're using is distorted or has a strange frequency response you'll hear it.
If you've got spare studio monitors that's the way to go rather than a stage wedge or something. Recording in the control room works well too. At least then you know that the bleed will sound its best.
Here's some tips I've used: A figure of 8 mics generally have the deadest null, if you need more rejection. Remember that this is a plane - not just a spot below the mic. Therefore you can even have the monitor at ear level if you want. You can use mechanical filter (i.e. a baffle) between the monitor and the mic while not blocking the path to the singer's ear. You can strategically block 1st reflections from behind the singer.
Studio monitors are a good idea. I've used our spare Genelecs for studio live in TV shoots. Usually the artists have loved the sound ("The best monitoring ever!").
Studio monitors are a good idea. I've used our spare Genelecs for studio live in TV shoots. Usually the artists have loved the sound ("The best monitoring ever!").
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
Usually, you would do a complete take of whatever was being played in the room at the time, until it is a great take.
Then you could add additional overdubs. Overdubs which do NOT replace anything from the original performance.
Then, you will absolutely not have to worry about the bleed.
As soon as you start editing.. then go to the hell that is editing with bleed.
Refer to my first sentence, for tips on correcting any "editing" you may think of doing.
Cheers
Then you could add additional overdubs. Overdubs which do NOT replace anything from the original performance.
Then, you will absolutely not have to worry about the bleed.
As soon as you start editing.. then go to the hell that is editing with bleed.
Refer to my first sentence, for tips on correcting any "editing" you may think of doing.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
I seem to recall the Beatles doing this early on, with a big speaker cabinet they called The White Elephant.jhharvest wrote:Here's some tips I've used: A figure of 8 mics generally have the deadest null, if you need more rejection. Remember that this is a plane - not just a spot below the mic. Therefore you can even have the monitor at ear level if you want.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
- tonewoods
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:48 pm
- Location: Orcas Island, WA
- Contact:
Yeah, but they used a U47, which seems like it would pick up the Elephant in spades, even if properly positioned ...dwlb wrote:I seem to recall the Beatles doing this early on, with a big speaker cabinet they called The White Elephant.jhharvest wrote:Here's some tips I've used: A figure of 8 mics generally have the deadest null, if you need more rejection. Remember that this is a plane - not just a spot below the mic. Therefore you can even have the monitor at ear level if you want.
I love using a JBL Eon on a stand aimed at the null on a good ribbon, like a BK-11...
Blast the Eon, and start incrementally moving the mic till the bleed on the faders is at it's lowest level, and lock the mic in place.
Sometimes it can be quite "off" from where you think it "should" be...
This is basically how I do all my vocal ODs, and singers--once they try it out--love this method...
Better communication is a huge plus, and it can be like a good gig, with better vocal performances resulting...
Horn section ODs really benefit from this technique too...
If you're trying to do the vox live, an Eon on the floor aimed at the null of a good-rejecting cardioid ribbon like a Beyer M260 or M500 is a really good way to go...
"You see, the whole thing about recording is the attempt at verisimilitude--not truth, but the appearance of truth."
Jerry Wexler
Jerry Wexler
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
They also used a U48, which could be set to figure-eight. I'd imagine they used U48s for this type of tracking. The "Recording the Beatles" book mentions both 47s and 48s in their discussion of the White Elephant vocal overdub situation.tonewoods wrote:Yeah, but they used a U47, which seems like it would pick up the Elephant in spades, even if properly positioned ...dwlb wrote:I seem to recall the Beatles doing this early on, with a big speaker cabinet they called The White Elephant.jhharvest wrote:Here's some tips I've used: A figure of 8 mics generally have the deadest null, if you need more rejection. Remember that this is a plane - not just a spot below the mic. Therefore you can even have the monitor at ear level if you want.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
This is not nearly as technical as some of the other solutions, but have you tried hypercardioid mics at all? Over the years, EV has made a bunch, both dynamic and condenser. At reasonable monitoring levels, with the mic obviously pointing away from the monitors and roughly between them, the bleed is pretty minimal. Then again, I'm a total amateur, so I may not be after the degree of precision that you are.
Shawn Mayer
http://www.magneticormosaic.com
http://www.magneticormosaic.com
hey, drumsound, that is a very interesting point, I've been wanting to do more of this "live vocal recording", so far we've only been screwing around, but the "passion" in the takes are much better doing it live.
Why do you think overheads and room mics are the best to turn down - is it basically anything that is high frequency like cymbals? or is it bleed that contains the sharp transient of percussion instruments?
(I ask because I'm wondering if the same logic can be applied to other instruments/sounds when doing this)
Why do you think overheads and room mics are the best to turn down - is it basically anything that is high frequency like cymbals? or is it bleed that contains the sharp transient of percussion instruments?
(I ask because I'm wondering if the same logic can be applied to other instruments/sounds when doing this)
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."
- Snarl 12/8
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3511
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
- Location: Right Cheer
- Contact:
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7542
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Bloomington IL
- Contact:
The high end bleeds easily, was why said engineer tracked that way in the control room. I've had decent success tracking vocals in the control room. In the live room a hypercardiod (M88 or 421) with good rejection has been helpful as well.roygbiv wrote:hey, drumsound, that is a very interesting point, I've been wanting to do more of this "live vocal recording", so far we've only been screwing around, but the "passion" in the takes are much better doing it live.
Why do you think overheads and room mics are the best to turn down - is it basically anything that is high frequency like cymbals? or is it bleed that contains the sharp transient of percussion instruments?
(I ask because I'm wondering if the same logic can be applied to other instruments/sounds when doing this)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests