waste

Discussion on new albums, developing listening skills, critical listening to others' work, as well as TOMB members' MP3 links, online recording critiques

Moderator: cgarges

Post Reply
User avatar
terryb
pushin' record
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: portland

waste

Post by terryb » Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:48 pm

any constructive criticism is much appreciated

https://soundcloud.com/universalconstan ... lderblades

User avatar
terryb
pushin' record
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: portland

Post by terryb » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:50 pm

I've revised the mix a few times and the most recent version is up.

there are a few moments where an errant note on the guitar clashes with the bass guitar note. The guitarist/songwriter told me she played it that way on purpose.
I tried just taking the couple of bass notes out so it doesn't get quite so muddy, but that sounds even weirder to me.
I also tried eq-ing the low out of the guitar at the point so it's not as evident. That also didn't work for my ears.
Can anyone offer any suggestions? I'm honestly looking for constructive feedback to help develop my mix skills.
thanks

User avatar
Snarl 12/8
cryogenically thawing
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: Right Cheer
Contact:

Post by Snarl 12/8 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:35 pm

From the description I thought I was gonna hate this, stylistically, but I really dug it. I think my only real qualm is the varying vocal level. I feel like the mix is constructed around the guitars, not the voice, and it should be about the voice. I can see a couple approaches worth considering.

1) Work with the voice solo'd until it sounds amazing and full. (I kinda think it needs de-essing and then compression and/or fader rides). Then bring in the other instruments one at a time making sure nothing ever steps on the vocal's toes. It could be that some 2-buss compression and/or verb "glues" it together.

2) The other would be to leave things kindof as they are but use the vocal as a side-chain on a compressor on the rest of the mix, so that when there's vox it "ducks" the rest by a db or two. That will probably sound like weird ass, but it would preserve the kindof waveriness of everything which I actually like a lot. I'm worried approach 1 will make it sound too much like everything else that's out there.

3) Ride the faders more. Maybe put the guitars on one, bass on another lead vox on another and dance 'em around so that voice is always there, but the other instruments get their moment in the sun too.

Regardless, I think it needs some de-essing before any of those approaches will help. Without de-essing I think it'll sound worse if you make the vox more prominent.

The dissonance doesn't bother me one bit. I think that aspect is very well done and I wouldn't try to hide it. I could see how mixing it you could come to dwell on that aspect and lose perspective on whether it's musical or not.

Good luck! Regardless of where you take it from here, I enjoyed listening to it as it is now.
Carl Keil

Almost forgot: Please steal my drum tracks. and more.

boid
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:18 pm
Location: Germany

Post by boid » Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:50 am

not bad at all
but to be honest it kinda sounds like ... well... a demo

for reasons like carl said
it sounds overall unprocessed, which is not a bad thing per se
but it depends on what the band wants to do with the demos
remember that the "common" listener is used to really compressed and "overproduced" music so something like this will sound weird to most people IME

nevertheless the minimalistic sound fits the music and if that's the sound they're going for there's no reason to change a thing!!

personally... with so much space in the mix and such a simple song I'd try to get the guitars more stereo
with one side heavy reverb/room/delay pretty hard L or R not too loud
and a more dry track where you want the guitar to sit.

User avatar
terryb
pushin' record
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: portland

Post by terryb » Fri Mar 22, 2013 1:28 pm

thanks for the critiques guys.

I'm not really sure how to go about making the vocal sound more full. I have a de-esser feature on the plugin the lead vox are going thru, and it's enabled. I can certainly turn the compression ratio up considerably. I can try adding other effects to it as well. Maybe massey tapehead or something similar.

I've never tried side-chaining anything before. Maybe it's time I attempted that.

seriously though, thanks for taking the time to offer me advice. Wish more people were as willing to help. It's hard mixing in a bubble.

User avatar
Snarl 12/8
cryogenically thawing
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: Right Cheer
Contact:

Post by Snarl 12/8 » Fri Mar 22, 2013 2:11 pm

Are you riding the vocal level at all? Maybe an hour spent drawing curves would be worthwhile. Maybe just notch out a bit of 2k(Maybe?! I'm constantly amazed at how off I am on my frequency guesses.) or whatever that slushy sounding frequency is on vocal first.
Carl Keil

Almost forgot: Please steal my drum tracks. and more.

User avatar
ott0bot
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2023
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Downtown Phoenix

Post by ott0bot » Sat Mar 23, 2013 7:05 am

yep. ride the vocal with volume automation. then use eq to cut out and distracting frequencies, then de-ess, then add compression after. than you can add back some frequencies with an eq after.

try just a touch of compression, then run that serial into another comp and you can experiment my going heavier on the comp or easing off. try sending the vox to an aux and having a parallel vocal panned hard L or R with some 100% wet verb. even just subtle this can make the vox sound "fuller"

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests