so... i'm not gonna vote.
- wing
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5375
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 12:00 pm
- Location: brooklyn, ny
- Contact:
so... i'm not gonna vote.
i know, i know, it's my upmost important privelege as a citizen, it's a very important right that i must exercise, bla bla, i've heard it all. even the tapeop banner above is pestering me about it.
when it comes down to it, i don't like or agree with the candidates. a lot of people want bush out of office, want a change, and i agree to an extent, but kerry doesn't look like that great of an option for me to even want to vote. i honestly don't like either of them, and don't see the reason in voting in this case. and i'm not going to bother with nader or whatever.
i know my vote count, but i don't want it to count for either of those dudes.
so i have come to a better option:
***WING 4 PREZ***
i promise to give you all free mics... we can all start a presidential jamband and throw tons of sweet parties. i promise to loweraise taxes. for every tax dollar saved we will throw another party. free burritos for all!
any ideas for my slogan?
when it comes down to it, i don't like or agree with the candidates. a lot of people want bush out of office, want a change, and i agree to an extent, but kerry doesn't look like that great of an option for me to even want to vote. i honestly don't like either of them, and don't see the reason in voting in this case. and i'm not going to bother with nader or whatever.
i know my vote count, but i don't want it to count for either of those dudes.
so i have come to a better option:
***WING 4 PREZ***
i promise to give you all free mics... we can all start a presidential jamband and throw tons of sweet parties. i promise to loweraise taxes. for every tax dollar saved we will throw another party. free burritos for all!
any ideas for my slogan?
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
First of all, I would probably vote for you, as long as you let me rock the drums every once in a while..
Re: the other thing about not wanting Bush or Kerry. Fine, but have you researched the independant or green party candidates? This country needs a viable 2nd party. Yes, I said 2nd, because the demopublicans are, as far as overall differences, just 2 sides of the same genral principles. It's a boys club of 'spirited" debate around issues these people have nothing to do with.
It might be worthwile to read up on the other candidates, even write directly to them and call their bluff. see what kind of response you get from them, see if it's canned politik-speak or not.
Re: the other thing about not wanting Bush or Kerry. Fine, but have you researched the independant or green party candidates? This country needs a viable 2nd party. Yes, I said 2nd, because the demopublicans are, as far as overall differences, just 2 sides of the same genral principles. It's a boys club of 'spirited" debate around issues these people have nothing to do with.
It might be worthwile to read up on the other candidates, even write directly to them and call their bluff. see what kind of response you get from them, see if it's canned politik-speak or not.
beware bee wear
- trashy
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 10:30 am
- Location: Red Bluff, CA
- Contact:
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
dude, even if you don't vote for prez, at least vote. There's gonna be local and statewide elections and whatnot. It's really easy (and pretty fun) to get involved in local elections and government, and you'd be surprised how important a role your local government plays in your life.
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
You could vote, but write yourself in. That way you get to participate but can send a message that you're not satisfied with the current choices.
- Mr. Dipity
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1528
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 11:29 am
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
Wing, you've got to write yourself in.awolski wrote:You could vote, but write yourself in. That way you get to participate but can send a message that you're not satisfied with the current choices.
If you don't vote this time, they won't know that you are ready to vote for the right person next time.
Besides, what if you win? How cool would that be?
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
Wing, I think your attitude is pretty wide spread and damn depressing to me. But what do I know...
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:43 pm
- Location: Sacramento, Ca
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
If you don't want vote Kerry, Nader or Bush then vote another third party. There really isn't any reason not to vote and apathy just makes it easier for those that desire nothing but power to get it.
- marqueemoon
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:56 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Contact:
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
![Image](http://messageboard.tapeop.com/templates/subSilver/images/tapeop1/header.full.jpg)
I the prostitute, shall not hide...
But I was very much bothered with my work!
But I was very much bothered with my work!
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:50 pm
- Location: In A Van Down By The River
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
I hate to say it, but I almost agree... at least in principle.
I'm not a total Bush hater, but I'm not real thrilled about him, but man, Kerry doesn't seem to offer an excitingly optimistic solution. I will definitely do the local voting thing, and chances are I will vote for prez too, but it really sucks.
ON a related question- I'd like to know what everyone thinks is the best way to get your news about the candidates. As spin-free as possible. It is really lame that we all have to be news reporters and gather data and report the facts ourselves, but it seems NO ONE is w/o a substantial bias these days.
NPR has been doing some good little stories about bending the truth on both sides. It makes my freakin' head spin. Every time I find something out, it's only a day before I find out it was only a half truth. And say what you want, it's happening on BOTH sides.
I'm not a total Bush hater, but I'm not real thrilled about him, but man, Kerry doesn't seem to offer an excitingly optimistic solution. I will definitely do the local voting thing, and chances are I will vote for prez too, but it really sucks.
ON a related question- I'd like to know what everyone thinks is the best way to get your news about the candidates. As spin-free as possible. It is really lame that we all have to be news reporters and gather data and report the facts ourselves, but it seems NO ONE is w/o a substantial bias these days.
NPR has been doing some good little stories about bending the truth on both sides. It makes my freakin' head spin. Every time I find something out, it's only a day before I find out it was only a half truth. And say what you want, it's happening on BOTH sides.
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 2:50 pm
- Location: Laveen, AZ
- Contact:
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
First of all, I vote based on the environment - Kerry has a wildly better record. Bush's administration has made it easier for people to chop down trees and to put mercury in the environment.
That said, I think you should seriously consider voting Libertarian if you don't like either party. I've heard the Libertarian guy speak and he is just a master of applying principles to government. I'm not sure I like his conclusions, but it was beautiful to hear a politician speak based on principle. The way he talks is like the Declaration of Independence or something!
That said, I think you should seriously consider voting Libertarian if you don't like either party. I've heard the Libertarian guy speak and he is just a master of applying principles to government. I'm not sure I like his conclusions, but it was beautiful to hear a politician speak based on principle. The way he talks is like the Declaration of Independence or something!
- wing
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5375
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 12:00 pm
- Location: brooklyn, ny
- Contact:
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
yea, i identify most with the libertarian party, but why bother? i know that sounds silly, but in my govt class, i learned that america will pretty much always be a 2 party system because of the way it was designed.Brian Brock wrote:First of all, I vote based on the environment - Kerry has a wildly better record. Bush's administration has made it easier for people to chop down trees and to put mercury in the environment.
That said, I think you should seriously consider voting Libertarian if you don't like either party. I've heard the Libertarian guy speak and he is just a master of applying principles to government. I'm not sure I like his conclusions, but it was beautiful to hear a politician speak based on principle. The way he talks is like the Declaration of Independence or something!
i'm gonna start the PARTY HARD PARTY!!!
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
I still say that not-voting is a form of voting.
I think it's pathetic that conservatives can motivate the Christian Right to vote because they believe that their candidate is the chosen one, and the mainstream doesn't even blink at this seachange.
I think it's pathetic that conservatives can motivate the Christian Right to vote because they believe that their candidate is the chosen one, and the mainstream doesn't even blink at this seachange.
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
"always be a 2 party system because of the way it was designed. "
Well, it wasnt really DESIGNED to have any parties at all. Infact George Washington hated the fact that the US became a party system.
One thing i'm kinda surprised hasn't been mentioned yet (or maybe i just missed it). This is something that i think everyone here would have a feeling about. Remember a few months ago something was passed that allowed Clear Channel to own even more stuff than it already did? Sorry i don't have more information, my memory sucks.
But I think for most of us in (or hoping to be in) the recording industry that's a pretty bad thing.
That said, i'll probably be non-voting also. I'd feel like a liar saying someone should be president when i don't believe they should.
Well, it wasnt really DESIGNED to have any parties at all. Infact George Washington hated the fact that the US became a party system.
One thing i'm kinda surprised hasn't been mentioned yet (or maybe i just missed it). This is something that i think everyone here would have a feeling about. Remember a few months ago something was passed that allowed Clear Channel to own even more stuff than it already did? Sorry i don't have more information, my memory sucks.
But I think for most of us in (or hoping to be in) the recording industry that's a pretty bad thing.
That said, i'll probably be non-voting also. I'd feel like a liar saying someone should be president when i don't believe they should.
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:48 pm
- Location: ohio
- Contact:
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
awesome dude! being ignorant and complacent RULZ!!! YEAH!!!
KICK ASS!! APATHY! ALL RIGHT!
KICK ASS!! APATHY! ALL RIGHT!
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:25 am
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
- Contact:
Re: so... i'm not gonna vote.
Really? You think the transportation, food, health care, logging, and energy companies should set their own regulations?wing wrote: yea, i identify most with the libertarian party, but why bother?
You think that we ought to privatize our police and prison systems?
You think welfare and education should be privatized, or left to private corporations/charities to fulfill?
Interesting...
Personally, I think the "not voting" thing is the height of ignorance. If you can't imagine a difference in this country under a Bush administrations vs. a Kerry administration, you've got some home work to do. Like it or not, those are your choices (if not, there's better things to do to protest than to not vote).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests