Vocal sound - natural or larger than life?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
User avatar
Meriphew
deaf.
Posts: 1759
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 9:56 am
Location: Seattle USA

Vocal sound - natural or larger than life?

Post by Meriphew » Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:58 pm

How do you prefer to have the vocals end up on your recordings - natural sounding, like the singer is standing right in front of you, or larger than life with alot of color? How do you get (equipment and techniques) what you're looking for?

I like my vox to be a combination of the two typically (THOUGH leaning a bit more to the colored side of the spectrum), and use either a Soundelux Elux 251 > GT Vipre > HD or a Shure Beta 58 > API > HD. Normally sung about 8" away from the mic w/Stedman windscreen in a small vocal booth.

John Jeffers
buyin' a studio
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:16 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Post by John Jeffers » Sat Nov 26, 2005 1:12 pm

Totally depends on the style, but given that I usually do a fair amount of verb and delay on the vocals. I mix exclusively in the box (for cost reasons), and like the UAD-1's DreamVerb on vocals.

One track I did recently was a rock track with a rap vocal in the middle. I treated the rock vocals as I usually do, but ended up leaving the rap vocals completely dry except for some LA-2A compression.

lyman
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 5:14 pm
Location: Plymouth Rock City, MA

Post by lyman » Sat Nov 26, 2005 2:50 pm

One track I did recently was a rock track with a rap vocal in the middle. I treated the rock vocals as I usually do, but ended up leaving the rap vocals completely dry except for some LA-2A compression.

i find that hip hop vocals sound terrible with reverb on them. compression is good, especially with a handheld mic as many artists like recording that way.

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Re: Vocal sound - natural or larger than life?

Post by JGriffin » Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:21 pm

Meriphew wrote:How do you prefer to have the vocals end up on your recordings - natural sounding, like the singer is standing right in front of you, or larger than life with alot of color? How do you get (equipment and techniques) what you're looking for?
For clients, I prefer to make it sound how they want it. One of my clients likes lots of reverb and I tend to add short delays as well. He's a big fan of production. Another client likes things very dry and up-front; I've found the 1176-type plugins by Bomb Factory and Purple Audio to be helpful here. For me, it varies. Sometimes "natural sounding," which can involve some light compression, rolling off lows, a little delay. Sometimes I like to jazz it up a little, and add a short delay (10-25 ms) for a slight thickening/doubling, sometimes with a touch of modulation. I also double-track a lot, and in general I enjoy slappy delays. My more "naturalistic" vocals have been cut with an EV 667; mostly though I tend to use U87, U89 or AKG 414s for vocals.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Sun Nov 27, 2005 5:33 am

It's TOTALLY different from project to project. And that's not to say that there's "either-or." Take something like System Of A Down and you've got seemingly dry vocals in the context of something that sounds sort of "larger than life" overall, then look at something like Emmylou Harris' "Wrecking Ball," which has very bright and effected vocals in a very personal-sounding context. Either way can work, depending largely on the emotional context of the material. I enjoy the challenge of mixing, say, a hip hop project involving two guys and working on giving each their own "identity" in terms of sound, without it being like "Oh, here's reverb guy and now here's dry vocal guy." There's a lot you can do with subtle verbs, delays, EQs, filtering, compression, distortion, mic selection and mic technique.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

User avatar
surf's up
pushin' record
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:34 am
Location: Texas

Post by surf's up » Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:40 am

I try to keep things "realistic" partly because the reverbs i have access to tend to sound fake when used too copiously. I like to double-track, it just gives a beautiful effect. I almost always add a touch of reverb, sometimes a little bit from several different reverbs. Im still kind of figuring out whether or not i like delay on vocals. sometimes it seems to work and then doesnt, other times it does. i guess, like others have said, it depends on the project and needs of the artist you are working with.

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Post by joel hamilton » Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:02 pm

I like to go for the perfect vocal sound.

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:05 pm

joel hamilton wrote:I like to go for the perfect vocal sound.

That'd be Emmylou Harris, then.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Post by joel hamilton » Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:21 pm

dwlb wrote:
joel hamilton wrote:I like to go for the perfect vocal sound.

That'd be Emmylou Harris, then.
:)

User avatar
nick_a
buyin' gear
Posts: 508
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 2:10 pm
Location: arlington VA
Contact:

Post by nick_a » Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:35 pm

what I like to hear (which is not at all what i end up doing every time) is something lifelike, which to me a lot of times makes it larger-than-life. if that makes any sense. like something that when you turn it up is scary because you feel like the person is all around you.

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Post by joel hamilton » Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:55 pm

nick_a wrote:what I like to hear (which is not at all what i end up doing every time) is something lifelike, which to me a lot of times makes it larger-than-life. if that makes any sense. like something that when you turn it up is scary because you feel like the person is all around you.
I agree.

I dont even feel like there is a distinction to be made between "larger than life or realistic."

It is a human voice. some people sound larger than life standing right next to me. Some dont. I go for huge every time i put up a microphone, and then start whittling if needed to suit the song.

User avatar
joelpatterson
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1732
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 5:20 pm
Location: Albany, New York

Post by joelpatterson » Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:57 pm

Turn the mix all all ALL the way down, and can you still hear the words?

If you can't, then you don't really have a "song," do you?
Mountaintop Studios
~The Peak of Perfection~
Petersburgh NY 12138

mountaintop@taconic.net

the brill bedroom
pushin' record
Posts: 233
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:44 am
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Post by the brill bedroom » Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:51 pm

dwlb wrote:
joel hamilton wrote:I like to go for the perfect vocal sound.

That'd be Emmylou Harris, then.

Where can i get that plug in?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests