If people are crazy about Ampex 351 preamps, why not 440's?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
honkyjonk
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2182
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 10:50 pm
Location: Portland

If people are crazy about Ampex 351 preamps, why not 440's?

Post by honkyjonk » Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:50 pm

Seriously,

The 440 tape decks are seriously groovy. Considering all the 440 electronics there are out there, why not make those into pres?

Just wondering.

User avatar
brianroth
tinnitus
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Oklahoma City

Post by brianroth » Sun Dec 18, 2005 3:50 am

The Ampex 350 and 351 audio electronics included an "inherent" mic preamp stage as a standard feature. By the time the 440 was released, few if any people were jacking mics directly into a tape recorder, but instead running through a desk.

Hence, a mic-level input capability for the 440 was dropped as a standard feature. Instead, you had to purchase a separate optional plug-in "can" that was inserted into the octal "accessory" socket on the rear of the 440 audio chassis. This preamp can had a tiny Beyer "peanut" input transformer that overloaded easily, especially at low frequencies. It was not the greatest preamp in the world, especially for modern types of music and hot mics.

I won't get into the toooob vs. solid state argument.

Bri

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7484
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:29 pm

I know a mix engineer with 8 440 modules that he uses to add some ju-ju.on really 'clinical' tracks he sometimes gets.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests