| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Patsquatch audio school graduate
Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:35 pm Post subject: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
Hi, I've been getting in to mastering lately and have a question about bit rates.
Starting with the 24 bit mix I open up a 24 bit protools session. Create 2 audio tracks and an Aux track. have the mix buss out of its track into the aux then into the empty audio track. I insert Ozone 4 on to the aux track and perform my EQ, limiting and Dither. I then would record the mastered mix onto the empty audio track running it through Ozone 4. After it is bounced I then export the mastered region out of the session via the export file as option (Shift, command, K) as a 44.1/16 bit file tweakhead.
Because I am recording it back into a 24 bit session is the dither actually doing anything or is it just adding noise. Should I really be recording it out of protools into another recording system? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MoreSpaceEcho on a wing and a prayer
Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 5780
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:04 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
i would leave the dither off at first. do your eq and whatever in ozone. save that as 24 bit. do the fade in/out, put the dither on when you export to 16 bit. _________________ www.oldcolonymastering.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patsquatch audio school graduate
Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:15 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| Ok so I should process the dither using the audio suite after I record off the track. I'm still left with a 24 bit file with dither on it until I export it out of pro tools. The other idea i had was to apply the dither when I burn the final PMCD. In other words leave it as 24 bit until I burn the final master or create the DDP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bro Shark buyin' gear
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 567 Location: SF
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:09 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| I was told by an employee at Avid that shift-command-K automatically applies dither. He said you would only use a dither plugin if you are doing a realtime bounce to a different bit rate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patsquatch audio school graduate
Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:11 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| If thats true I wonder if there is a way to select which type of dither you would like to use. If it is only the DigiRack version that's terrible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bro Shark buyin' gear
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 567 Location: SF
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:14 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
Yeah, I don't even know if it's true. I don't have the patience to pore through the documentation, so take it for what it is: unverified info.
It would make sense though, since it's generally better IMO to record to a stereo track in the same session than bounce, and you want to apply dither only as a last step, when converting to 16 bit. For what it's worth, that's how my mastering guy works. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dakota re-cappin' neve

Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 741 Location: West of Boston
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:44 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
Agreed. Leave all dither off while doing this kind of thing. Only dither at the very last step, the final trimmed file when it goes to 16 bit.
Voxengo R8brain is very good for final conversion and dither.
An aside you might consider: when I'm mastering, even if the source mix is 44.1k, I import to a 88.2k 24bit session so any plugs used run at high resolution. This does make a favorable sonic difference. Then down-convert only at the last step. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kslight george martin
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 1251
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:49 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| Bro Shark wrote: | Yeah, I don't even know if it's true. I don't have the patience to pore through the documentation, so take it for what it is: unverified info.
It would make sense though, since it's generally better IMO to record to a stereo track in the same session than bounce, and you want to apply dither only as a last step, when converting to 16 bit. For what it's worth, that's how my mastering guy works. |
Can you explain how recording to a stereo track in the same session is better than a bounce? Not being a smart-ass...literally want to know. I've seen this mentioned a couple times but never A/B-ed it for myself.
And correct me if I'm wrong, but then the process using this technique would involve having your mastering plugins as an insert on the stereo track in question with no dither, and route those to another track to record...then apply dither and bounce this track down to 16 bit? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bro Shark buyin' gear
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 567 Location: SF
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:59 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| kslight wrote: | | Can you explain how recording to a stereo track in the same session is better than a bounce? Not being a smart-ass...literally want to know. I've seen this mentioned a couple times but never A/B-ed it for myself. |
Some people say it sounds better. I can't speak to that. I meant, it's a better workflow. I've found the Bounce feature in PT to be real brittle (breaks easily) Conversely, recording a stereo track is as stable as anything else. Also, this technique allows you to make edits to the 2-buss track after it's recorded, or stop in the middle and change something, hit record again, and then paste sections together. It's just a lot more reliable and versatile than hitting Bounce and hoping for the best.
IMO there is no reason to use Bounce in PT.
| Quote: | | And correct me if I'm wrong, but then the process using this technique would involve having your mastering plugins as an insert on the stereo track in question with no dither, and route those to another track to record...then apply dither and bounce this track down to 16 bit? |
Everything you said, except don't apply dither. If what I was told is correct, when you ctrl-shift-K and select 16 bits (from 24) then PT will automatically apply dither while it's converting the file. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kslight george martin
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 1251
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:04 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
[/quote]
Everything you said, except don't apply dither. If what I was told is correct, when you ctrl-shift-K and select 16 bits (from 24) then PT will automatically apply dither while it's converting the file.[/quote]
Is there any meaningful difference between the dither from Avid versus that on the Waves plugins? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kslight george martin
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 1251
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
Hmm I get nothing when I try to CTRL-shift-k... When I do file export to AAF/OMF I just get a million or so different files...not one wav.
What am I missing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bro Shark buyin' gear
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 567 Location: SF
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:00 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| kslight wrote: | Hmm I get nothing when I try to CTRL-shift-k... When I do file export to AAF/OMF I just get a million or so different files...not one wav.
What am I missing? |
Did you highlight the region you want to export first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patsquatch audio school graduate
Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:42 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| kslight wrote: | Hmm I get nothing when I try to CTRL-shift-k... When I do file export to AAF/OMF I just get a million or so different files...not one wav.
What am I missing? |
Its Shift Command ("Apple") K Or you can click on the down arrow at the top of the region menu and select "Export Region File As" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patsquatch audio school graduate
Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:55 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| So I tried recording my mastered mix with out dither and then apply dither after I trimmed the head and tail. I then exported the region via shift command k. It sounds like it's missing a lot of the detail. did I do anything wrong or am I just hearing the 24 bit and 16 bit difference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bro Shark buyin' gear
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 567 Location: SF
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:17 pm Post subject: Re: Mastering In The Box? |
|
|
| Patsquatch wrote: | | So I tried recording my mastered mix with out dither and then apply dither after I trimmed the head and tail. I then exported the region via shift command k. It sounds like it's missing a lot of the detail. did I do anything wrong or am I just hearing the 24 bit and 16 bit difference. |
Yeah, again. Don't apply dither. Ctrl-shift-k applies it for you, automatically.
Do not apply dither. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|