Determining per-song rate for mixing
Determining per-song rate for mixing
I have a project that I have tracked and am mixing at my studio for a client. So far I have been charging an hourly rate, but I am wondering if a per-song rate for the mixes would be more appropriate. I am referring to time I spend by myself in the studio, not time where the client is present.
I think a per-song rate might be more appropriate because of my process for working on mixes - It's not a matter of sitting down and mixing a song in one session and being finished. I tend to work on a mix a bit, live with it for a little while, go back in and make a few tweaks, repeat etc. (NOTE - I am mixing in the box, so recall is easy.)
That being said I think that I would like to come up with a fair per-song rate equivalent to a reasonable amount of mixing "time", but I am not sure how many hours to base it on.
What's a reasonable time to spend mixing a song - one hour? Two and a half hours?? I realize that all situations are different but am interested in other engineer's thoughts on this.
I think a per-song rate might be more appropriate because of my process for working on mixes - It's not a matter of sitting down and mixing a song in one session and being finished. I tend to work on a mix a bit, live with it for a little while, go back in and make a few tweaks, repeat etc. (NOTE - I am mixing in the box, so recall is easy.)
That being said I think that I would like to come up with a fair per-song rate equivalent to a reasonable amount of mixing "time", but I am not sure how many hours to base it on.
What's a reasonable time to spend mixing a song - one hour? Two and a half hours?? I realize that all situations are different but am interested in other engineer's thoughts on this.
- A.David.MacKinnon
- ears didn't survive the freeze
- Posts: 3822
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:57 am
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
On days when you mix with the client present and do a mix start to finish how long does it take? Figure out what your average is and then add another hour for touch ups and anything else (vocal up, vocal down, TV mix etc). Use that as your starting point. I can do about 4 songs a day if I'm really motoring, more if I tracked the songs and lots of mix decisions are built into the tracks, less if somebody else tracked and I have to fix things.
- Waltz Mastering
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:22 am
- Location: Third Stone From The Sun
- Contact:
Re: Determining per-song rate for mixing
Really depends and is usually project dependent based primarily on budget.groover wrote: I would like to come up with a fair per-song rate equivalent to a reasonable amount of mixing "time", but I am not sure how many hours to base it on.
For attended session, hourly seems to work, if you're doing a combo platter attended and unattended, you could consider an hourly rate for attended and a set rate for un-attended. For fully unattended, a per song rate seems to work best..
Things to consider are budget, track count, expectations, and experience.
Attended or unattended? ..the shape the tracks are in when you receive them or if you tracked the project yourself.
- JohnDavisNYC
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 2:43 pm
- Location: crooklyn, ny
- Contact:
I think the per song thing is in mot cases a highly flawed concept. it's nearly impossible to get it right, and in almost every situation, either you are working too hard for the fee, or the client is paying too much for the mix...
a piano trio record with 9 mics is a very different mix than an electronic rock mix with 60 tracks, there is no way that both of those things can be mixed at the same rate.
also, even in the box, once you've got your basic vibe on the first tune, you might spend 5 hours on that, then there might be a song later on the record that is super stripped down, and works in 25 minutes after you push up the faders (or mouse)...
anyway, these are my thoughts on flat rate mixing, after spending a long time trying to figure it out for myself, and finally deciding that there are just too many variables to be able to create a situation where no one is getting screwed...
maybe the only situation where that works is with larger budgets where you can just say 'i'll mix a song/day, here's my day rate'.... but those are unlikely and 90% of the time I'm trying to bring the record in as affordably as possible. and most of the time mixing efficiently on a day rate system is the most cost effective for the client.
John
a piano trio record with 9 mics is a very different mix than an electronic rock mix with 60 tracks, there is no way that both of those things can be mixed at the same rate.
also, even in the box, once you've got your basic vibe on the first tune, you might spend 5 hours on that, then there might be a song later on the record that is super stripped down, and works in 25 minutes after you push up the faders (or mouse)...
anyway, these are my thoughts on flat rate mixing, after spending a long time trying to figure it out for myself, and finally deciding that there are just too many variables to be able to create a situation where no one is getting screwed...
maybe the only situation where that works is with larger budgets where you can just say 'i'll mix a song/day, here's my day rate'.... but those are unlikely and 90% of the time I'm trying to bring the record in as affordably as possible. and most of the time mixing efficiently on a day rate system is the most cost effective for the client.
John
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5574
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
- Jeff White
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3263
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
+1000Nick Sevilla wrote:Keep charging by the hour.
I can't imagine ever mixing on a paid-per-song basis.
Jeff
I record, mix, and master in my Philly-based home studio, the Spacement. https://linktr.ee/ipressrecord
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 373 guests