can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

general questions, comments and ideas about recording, audio, music, etc.
versuviusx
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 798
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:14 pm

can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by versuviusx » Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:46 pm

hi i was wondering if anyone could give me a definition of class A circuitry?
what are the prerequisites of it being class A?

User avatar
ulriggribbons
steve albini likes it
Posts: 398
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:50 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by ulriggribbons » Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:02 pm

A class A amplifier stage basically means that the device (be it tube or transistor) is conducting current throughout the complete cycle of signal swing. think of it as always on.

It is the most linear(has the lowest distortion) of the different class operations, but also the most inefficient. I'm sure this is all over the net. google for Amplifier Classes or Amplifier Design.

Edit: Check this pdf from Crown Audio:

http://www.crownaudio.com/itech/pdf/137234.pdf

Regards

ju.

Stephen B.
gettin' sounds
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 11:39 am

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by Stephen B. » Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:48 pm

The way I understand it is to think of our trusty sine wave. In a class A amplifier, the amplifier will amplify the whole wave. In an alternative called Class AB (or push-pull in the hi-fi world) the signal is first split into two parts, the positive voltage and the negative voltage and amplified separately, then recombined. Does anybody know if there are other ways other than class A or class AB?
"Badness is only spoiled goodness."

C.S. Lewis

User avatar
soundguy
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by soundguy » Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:07 pm

A google search wil churn out more info than you thought possible, perhaps challenging the notion that the internet is for porn.

Im all for knowledge, but understanding theory of operation probably doesnt translate to a whole lot for someone just starting with this stuff.

The most important thing to realize is that if your amp isnt class A, it isnt a big deal, like, AT ALL. Marketing people have turned a tech spec into jargon which makes you wonder how long it will be before we see people advertising that they have .03 percent total harmonic distortion. Considering that we already see idiiots advertising that their shit has great third harmonic distirtion, something tells me we wont see THD specs in the ad...

At any rate, fender never made a class A amp [edit: reading this over Im wrong about this, but probably %97 of their designs were push pull a/b). Didnt really hurt fender too much, did it? I think the only marshall that ran class a was the 18 watt blluesbreaker combo. A vox ac30 is a class a guitar amp. The "black" 1176 that people fiend over came in several versions, some with a class A output stage, some with a class AB output stage. Yes they sound different, yes daily people are fooled that all "black" 1176's are the same. Neve 1073's are class A. 1081's run class A throughout the EQ but the output stage is run class A/B. There are many many many many neve consoles that use class A 1073's on the input but then use class A/B amplifiers for the mix buss makeup gain, meaning that the entire sound of the console, before it hits the world, runs through a class AB summing stage. Also worth noting, with a passive mix buss, the buss amplifier design is especially critical, yet neve went with a class a/b design. Not all neve consoles that use class A EQ's are run entirely class A. Why might you ask? Because the consoles were designed to SOUND COOL not look cool in an advertisement, so the appropriate cool sounding summing stage was applied for the righteous sound.

If I was given the task of putting together a studio with an entirely class a/b signal path, it would so not be a limiting factor on any level whatsoever. You could still have all the best shit ever made and make recordings that would totally slay if you knew what you were doing.

By all means learn about this stuff but dont think for a second that there is some paradigm of audio that class A brings that is just so beyond the pale of everything else causing you to spin out into thinking that you need to buy even MORE shit that cant afford.

dave
Last edited by soundguy on Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.glideonfade.com
one hundred percent discrete transistor recording with style and care.

User avatar
ulriggribbons
steve albini likes it
Posts: 398
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:50 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by ulriggribbons » Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:30 pm

game... set... match.... soundguy :D

User avatar
vatoben
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: cat hair
Contact:

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by vatoben » Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:32 pm

here's another good explanation:

http://www.mesaboogie.com/US/Smith/ClassA.htm

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by joel hamilton » Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:43 pm

Like Dave said. AND: It depends on WHOSE class "A" or "AB" you are talking about.None of which makes something the holy grail of audio. The fender amp is the PERFECT example. "didnt hurt them too much." Awesome...

The output stage in certain 33609 (neve compressors) is A/B, and that didnt seem to bum anyone out either... There are a zillion exam,ples of a "push pull" amp design that rocks...

Zeppelin4Life
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: Purdue University

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by Zeppelin4Life » Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:20 pm

Basically class A has a continous signal ALWAYS flowing. the result is more pristine audio quality. the downside is it tends to be less efficient. Leave a bunch of class A pres on all day, your power bill will be significantly higher than a few B or AB. thats true. but if your buying a class-A anything you can probably afford that, right?

As for guitar amps, the AC-30 seems to the be the standard when it comes to class-A output
?I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.?
David L
KC2UUM
RadioReference.com Admin, Albany NY

User avatar
soundguy
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by soundguy » Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:24 pm

Zeppelin4Life wrote:Basically class A has a continous signal ALWAYS flowing. the result is more pristine audio quality.

this is absolutely dependant upon the design and by no means proxy of all class A designs. I'll let you listen to some class A designs I have done and you can hear how terrible class A can sound. You comment is also completely subjective.

dave
http://www.glideonfade.com
one hundred percent discrete transistor recording with style and care.

Zeppelin4Life
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: Purdue University

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by Zeppelin4Life » Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:28 pm

.What the signal flow? wrong. class-A always has a continuous signal, its part of its guts. Soundwise? well, of course that it varies, plus people have very strong opinions (no shit, welcome to audio!) but this is a Class-A vs. Class-X (B, A/B, D)...as if we had the same pre build..so theoretically, you cant argue that Class-A is not supposed to sound better. Countless bassists hate tubed amps. i know many drummers who use piccolos as main snares. O-P-I-N-I-O-N! But you can't argue with the science of it..never

For the poster, Incase your wondering

Class-B is a little more efficient, it uses two 'push-pull' elements. Prone to cross over distortion (due to the two amps switching)

Class-A/B-Similar to B, but like A in the fact that no driver is ever completely 'off'. some distortion, but very smooth compared to B in terms of cross-over. Still a little more efficient that A

Class-C. youll probably never see this in Audio.I've heard of them in RF radio stuff. biased below cutoff, I believe

Class-D. digital in a sense. but thats all I know..this is also rare.
?I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.?
David L
KC2UUM
RadioReference.com Admin, Albany NY

User avatar
soundguy
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by soundguy » Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:57 pm

Zeppelin4Life wrote:.What the signal flow? wrong. class-A always has a continuous signal, its part of its guys. Soundwise? well, of course that it various (no shit, welcome to audio!) but this is a Class-A vs. Class-X (B, A/B, D)...as if we had the same pre build..so theoretically, you cant argue that Class-A is not supposed to sound better. Countless bassists hate tubed amps. i know many drummers who use piccolos as main snares. O-P-I-N-I-O-N! But you can't argue with the science of it..never
Considering that you did a fine job of laying out that opinion is the bottom line of evaluating what comes out of a speaker, its moronic to sugges that simply because a amplifier is continuously conducting that it sounds better as you sugggested with your statement "basically class A has continuous signal ALWAYS flowing. the result is more pristine audio quality". If you want to discuss facts that you can look at on an oscilloscope and hope to have people take you seriously, do not back them up with a completely subjective opinion on the subject. This is my big problem with the current trend in advertising rigth now, saying something is operating class A as if to suggest that its some kind of plus feature. Who gives a fuck how your circuit is working if it doesnt sound good. Desinging a circuit in class A does not mean you are going to get more pristine audio quality. All it means, pretty much to me is that you are gonna get, in most examples, maybe more heat disapation and thats about it. Desinging a circuit that is running in class A any given percentage of the time just means that as a designer you've chosen a mode of operation that has advantages and disadvantages both of which need to be taken into consideration to get the most "pristine audio quality" out of the circuit which of course is completely subjective so far as the designers taste and operating goals of the citcuit concerned.

dave
http://www.glideonfade.com
one hundred percent discrete transistor recording with style and care.

Zeppelin4Life
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: Purdue University

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by Zeppelin4Life » Fri Feb 11, 2005 7:01 pm

soundguy wrote: Desinging a circuit that is running in class A any given percentage of the time just means that as a designer you've chosen a mode of operation that has advantages and disadvantages both of which need to be taken into consideration to get the most "pristine audio quality" out of the circuit which of course is completely subjective so far as the designers taste and operating goals of the citcuit concerned.

I tihnk you frogot smoe periods in their, man. :P


but to make this post worthwhile, everything you say is true. but I was trying to point out that the general idea of class A is that it is of higher fedelity. it might not be for everything, and sometimes it doesnt sound better. thats the answer. but theoretically it is.

Class A:
-Continuous flow of the cycle
-'pure' with no cross-over distortion/error
-generally expensive
-excess energy (lots of xtra heat), inefficient
Last edited by Zeppelin4Life on Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
?I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.?
David L
KC2UUM
RadioReference.com Admin, Albany NY

wardshorsehead
buyin' gear
Posts: 501
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 10:52 pm

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by wardshorsehead » Fri Feb 11, 2005 7:42 pm

im only 16, what the hell do I know?
sorry, but while dave's passion for shit to sound good can sometimes cause him to forget common courtesy, this isn't one of those times.

a little manners goes a long way, hype is hype, and dave is right.

that'll be $35 dave.

frank

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by joel hamilton » Fri Feb 11, 2005 9:37 pm

The compressor I used for the vocals of Frank Black, Ludacris, and Nina Persson is not class A. The mic pre I used to record the guitar of Marc Ribot, Mark Linkous, and Frank Black is not class A..... All of that was fine for those people, seemed to work out okay.... I never even for one second thought about that. I just went with my gut as to what would flatter the performance.I only reference the names because they have a budget, so if we needed everything to be "the best" we had it. Not once was anyone, (even the A&R guys!) like "are you sure you want to go with a class A/B output stage on that???"

If you ae a tech, this will matter a lot I guess. I am not, I record music, and other annoyances ;)

User avatar
MD
gettin' sounds
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 11:37 am
Location: NY, NY

Re: can someone please give me the definition of Class A?

Post by MD » Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:03 pm

Zeppelin4Life wrote: As for guitar amps, the AC-30 seems to the be the standard when it comes to class-A output
Great stuff everyone. Very educational for me.

In case you every want to know more than you want to know:

http://www.aikenamps.com/VoxAC30classA_2.html

-MD

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests