Panning and perceived volume

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

User avatar
Wonderland
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Location: the Isle of Charm
Contact:

Post by Wonderland » Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:50 pm

Pascals, yes.

Threads like this...indeed.

Pure feckin' Genius. 8)
JupiterFalls @ The Space
JupiterFalls @ The Planet

We are The Musicmakers...
& We are The Dreamers of The Dreams.

LRRec
audio school graduate
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:02 pm

Post by LRRec » Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:44 pm

There is a good discussion of panning and panpots in Handbook for Sound Engineers, The New Audio Cyclopedia, Chapter 23 written by Steve Dove.

In it he writes:

"Somewhere between these two extremes (if extremes is the right expression for a 6-dB difference) should lie a happy medium at which the signal keeps an even subjective level panning across the image plane and also "tracks" well (i.e., has good correlation between control position and image position). This has been the subject of raging controversy and opinion for decades. Should it be 2, 3, 3 1/2, 4, or 4 1/2 dB down at center?

As is often the case, those closely involved with the theorizing somewhat lost touch with how a panpot is ordinarily used. A pan control usually remains rusted at an initially set position for hours, days, weeks, months-however long the mix takes. If a panpot is used dynamically for effect during a mix its very drama drowns any question of whether it was "a wee bit quiet in the middle."
Last edited by LRRec on Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Ivon
steve albini likes it
Posts: 366
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 4:13 am

Post by Ivon » Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:48 pm

Good topic. Keep the comments coming. I'm all ears and eager to learn.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests