Foolproof way to check your mixes

Discussion on new albums, developing listening skills, critical listening to others' work, as well as TOMB members' MP3 links, online recording critiques

Moderator: cgarges

User avatar
joelpatterson
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1732
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 5:20 pm
Location: Albany, New York

Foolproof way to check your mixes

Post by joelpatterson » Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:10 am

This is just a simple, psychological ploy.

I imagine for a second that I'm listening to something someone ELSE has done, because it's easy to see the flaws in something you're not bound up with emotionally and struggle-ishly.

Not that I'm overly viciously competitive or anything, but I play this little game, and if I say to myself, yeah, sure, what I'm hearing is something I would admire, then I know I'm doing okay.

Or if I say, yeah, they did okay, but the piano sounds like someone spread out aluminum foil over the strings, I got work to do.
Mountaintop Studios
~The Peak of Perfection~
Petersburgh NY 12138

mountaintop@taconic.net

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:31 pm

Getting to that point of objectivity is the tricky part.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

John Jeffers
buyin' a studio
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:16 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Post by John Jeffers » Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:19 am

This is where multiple personality disorder really comes in handy.

Yeah, what he said.

jebjerome
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Location: Easy Bay, CA

Post by jebjerome » Wed Nov 23, 2005 12:54 pm

I do this too, but sometimes I cannot tell if I'm truly able to get away from it enough. Generally, though it is a good exercise.

Alsos the simple questions, would I like this if I heard it randomly? or would this move me/interest me/whatever me? if I heard it randomly help me separate the wheat from the chaff.
<i>who shot...
What, who, the bazooka was who
And to my rescue, it was the S1Ws - PE</i>
Jeb

junkyardtodd
gettin' sounds
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 5:12 am
Location: lakewood, oh
Contact:

Post by junkyardtodd » Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:11 pm

My take on this is to give a copy of it to someone else, and then I listen to it again, and imagine that I am actually that someone else listening to it, instead of myself.
This sounds stranger when I see it in print, but it really does work for me.
Yes, I am one of THOSE people, up in the attic, trying to recreate the magical sounds of my youth (cheap trick, boston, pavement) on the family 8 track recorder.

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7484
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:48 pm

I like to listen while in other parts of the studio. It's my 'party test.' If this music were on at in another room at a party, would I want to seek out the music and listen closer?

lanterns
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 4:31 pm
Location: SoCal

Post by lanterns » Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:39 pm

i like to record a song and then throw it away. that way, the job is already done.

User avatar
jmoose
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Normal, IL USA
Contact:

Re: Foolproof way to check your mixes

Post by jmoose » Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:43 pm

joelpatterson wrote:This is just a simple, psychological ploy.

I imagine for a second that I'm listening to something someone ELSE has done, because it's easy to see the flaws in something you're not bound up with emotionally and struggle-ishly.

Not that I'm overly viciously competitive or anything, but I play this little game, and if I say to myself, yeah, sure, what I'm hearing is something I would admire, then I know I'm doing okay.

Or if I say, yeah, they did okay, but the piano sounds like someone spread out aluminum foil over the strings, I got work to do.
Hmmm...

How do you get yourself into that mindset? Usually when I'm working on something I'm so close to it and since I know where all the bodies are buried so to speak, that I can't listen to it as though it were someone else?s work. Plus, generally I have an idea of what the mix topology should be before I touch a fader and since I'm working towards that sound in my head it's hard to separate myself from it.

I know I'm done when I'm either dancing & boppin' around a bit, adjusting less & less on each pass or ideally both! Frequent breaks helps and I when I come back to the room I'll hit play and listen to the mix a couple times before doing anything. It's soooo easy to 'overmix' and take the life out of a song without really trying. 'Ya know, knob turning for the sake of knob turning. If you listen to the song and know what it should sound like stylistically then it'll tell you what it wants and it'll also tell you when it's done...that's usually when I stop hating it and roll the 2-track!
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
mixer|producer|audio engineer
www.mooseaudio.net

www.oxidelounge.com

User avatar
joelpatterson
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1732
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 5:20 pm
Location: Albany, New York

Post by joelpatterson » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:03 am

jmoose wrote:
Hmmm...

How do you get yourself into that mindset?
jmoose, you're a moose after my own heart. I also get the feeling of "hidden hands" guiding me towards what I need to do. I fall back on this sneaky ploy only when I'm sorta halfway aggravated/disgusted/frustrated by something about the mix that just won't come together. When everything's working out fine and you progress towards the solid groove unimpeded, and reach the transcendent point of boppin' around like you say, then there's no need to second-guess or question any decisions. But when I go back and forth, say snare too loud, snare too soft, snare too dominant, snare too submissive, and I seem stuck in a cycle of recrimination and reget--

That's when I flip a little internal switch and suddenly I'm here to critique just what the hell is wrong with this mix that _________ has sent me. I think "removing" myself from how I got into this mess lets me approach it fresh. And my viciously competitive nature just SIEZES on the flaws, and puts it in a whole new light. Thank God I get to do this out of the stern gaze of the artist. It would be humiliating to admit all the wrong turns and dead ends I stumble through to get to this cool, happenin' mix.
Mountaintop Studios
~The Peak of Perfection~
Petersburgh NY 12138

mountaintop@taconic.net

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7484
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:27 pm

joelpatterson wrote: Thank God I get to do this out of the stern gaze of the artist. It would be humiliating to admit all the wrong turns and dead ends I stumble through to get to this cool, happenin' mix.
AMEN!

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:20 pm

Play the mix for someone else. Preferably someone you know has a discerning ear, but really anyone. Stand next to them while you both listen. Take note of anything that, when you hear it, you hope s/he didn't, or anything you feel you have to speak up and explain away during the song.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

lsn110
steve albini likes it
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:09 am
Location: Ballston Spa, NY
Contact:

Post by lsn110 » Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:25 pm

I actually love non-technical opinions from generally disinterested people. My wife will hone in immediately on what she likes or doesn't like if I ask her. She still listens to music without getting analytical, which is a perspective I lost long ago.

Sometimes those opinions take translation, but they're usually right.

User avatar
jmoose
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Normal, IL USA
Contact:

Post by jmoose » Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:42 pm

joelpatterson wrote:jmoose, you're a moose after my own heart. I also get the feeling of "hidden hands" guiding me towards what I need to do. I fall back on this sneaky ploy only when I'm sorta halfway aggravated/disgusted/frustrated by something about the mix that just won't come together. When everything's working out fine and you progress towards the solid groove unimpeded, and reach the transcendent point of boppin' around like you say, then there's no need to second-guess or question any decisions. But when I go back and forth, say snare too loud, snare too soft, snare too dominant, snare too submissive, and I seem stuck in a cycle of recrimination and reget--
Yeah, for me it's more about 'feel' then individual instrument sounds. If the mix hasn't come together in two hours or less I usually pull all the faders down & take a half-hour break before I get back to it. Usually I'll do something mind numbing like play video games or post on a board while I blast Slayer or something that musically is totally unrelated to whatever I'm working on. But it depends on how far off the mark I am. If it's super close I might leave the faders as-is and slowly tweak after the break, but if it's WAY off the mark I'll pull to zero and start again rather then attempting to polish poo.

I can't remove myself from the process...after all...I'm not just part of it, in some ways I AM the process. Taking the artists wishes and the songs desires while the thought process in my head blends 'em all together with my ears & hands doing the work of the mind.
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
mixer|producer|audio engineer
www.mooseaudio.net

www.oxidelounge.com

User avatar
joelpatterson
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1732
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 5:20 pm
Location: Albany, New York

Post by joelpatterson » Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:41 pm

jmoose wrote:.... in some ways I AM the process.

That is so absolutely true. I always feel like we're, all of us, working at the level that is just beyond where the sound is. At the level of the sound, someone is singing and playing a guitar. If it sounds "real life," then it's good... but at my level, I'm trying to paint the picture that says, "Life is so short, and so vivid when it happens, you shouldn't get lost in thinking about it, you should live every minute." So that when you listen to the song, whatever the lyric is about, you find yourself having this wondrous reverence for the magnificence of being alive at certain times. That's the "real" job.

I really like the way you summed the thing up.
Mountaintop Studios
~The Peak of Perfection~
Petersburgh NY 12138

mountaintop@taconic.net

User avatar
joeysimms
ears didn't survive the freeze
Posts: 3838
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 10:10 am

Post by joeysimms » Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:14 pm

lsn110 wrote:I actually love non-technical opinions from generally disinterested people. My wife will hone in immediately on what she likes or doesn't like if I ask her. She still listens to music without getting analytical, which is a perspective I lost long ago.

Sometimes those opinions take translation, but they're usually right.
Absolutely. My wife will hear a mix and immediately say "why is the guitar so loud?" "I can't hear the vocals". It's easy for her to hear. It's very hard for vocalists to mix themselves loud enough. It's also hard for guitar players to mix themselves quieter! I am both!
beware bee wear

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests