liven up my recordings

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
User avatar
billiamwalker
pushin' record
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

liven up my recordings

Post by billiamwalker » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:29 am

right now i'm using a good sounding room and decent mics running into a firepod then to cubase. i'm not using any preamps or compressors besides the preamps in the firepod intereface and an alesis 3630 for tracking vocals.

what can i add (preamps, compressors) to start livening up my recordings. Should i buy, lets say, a preamps for the snare, overheads, and guitars, and compressors for the kick, bass, and some other guitar uses.

if so, what is some not-so-pricey peices of gear that'll start making some differences?

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:20 am

What about your recordings are you not happy with?
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

User avatar
billiamwalker
pushin' record
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by billiamwalker » Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:36 am

dwlb wrote:What about your recordings are you not happy with?
i'm getting getting quality recordings... it's just kind of missing the presense that i want. some of it can be fixed by a better mix i'm sure... but i'm just trying to boost the depth of the recording.

what have you people added to your setup that really boosted the depth/presense of your recordings? i know it's hard to understand because it's all a matter of opinion of what things should sound like.

kayagum
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN

Post by kayagum » Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:43 am

Mastering?

User avatar
billiamwalker
pushin' record
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by billiamwalker » Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:37 pm

kayagum wrote:Mastering?
before mastering.

because most of my customers can't afford to have music mastered at a mastering studio and digital mastering isn't always the best option although it is always going to be done. i'm talking about something to help it from the get-go.

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:07 pm

billiamwalker wrote:
dwlb wrote:What about your recordings are you not happy with?
i'm getting getting quality recordings... it's just kind of missing the presense that i want. some of it can be fixed by a better mix i'm sure... but i'm just trying to boost the depth of the recording.

what have you people added to your setup that really boosted the depth/presense of your recordings? i know it's hard to understand because it's all a matter of opinion of what things should sound like.
I understand presence and depth to be different things. But that said, it's hard to know what to suggest when -for example- I don't know what mics you're using. Or what kind of music you record.

On the other hand though, one of the criticisms of this board is that the suggestions for better recordings always involve buying more gear and spending more money...so to that end:

--get better guitar tones at the amp. This step alone has helped me immeasurably.
--practice and learn subtractive EQ so that you don't have un-needed frequencies cluttering your mix.
--use less reverb. Think short delays with little feedback instead.
--EQ your delay return so it doesn't eat up too much space.
--resist the urge to put reverb on everything.
--close-mic for presence, distance-mic for depth (see what I mean?).
--don't compress things that don't need to be compressed.
--mute instruments during parts of the song where they're not playing. For that matter, try muting instruments when they are playing, as it may clean up an arrangement.
--tune the drums.
--think about your arrangements. Do you have two guitarists strumming the same chords at the same positions on the neck, with the same guitar tones? Bust that up. Send 'em to neutral corners.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

User avatar
vvv
zen recordist
Posts: 10158
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 8:08 am
Location: Chi
Contact:

Post by vvv » Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:24 pm

Generically speaking, as a bedroom enthusiast (which probably isn't relevant :lol: ) and recordist, I would suggest that you have at least a couple different mic's, a decent compressor that you like, and at least a couple different pre's, in that order.

Asssuming that you've pretty much done dwlb's suggestions (to which I would add, change instruments; ex., Teles for rhythm and a Paul for lead, hihats on the verse and rides on the chorus, etc.) I answer based on my experience, and (low) budget.
bandcamp;
blog.
I mix with olive juice.

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:27 pm

vvv wrote: I would add, change instruments; ex., Teles for rhythm and a Paul for lead, hihats on the verse and rides on the chorus, etc.
Good points, those.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

Timothy Lawler
audio school
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: WA, USA
Contact:

Post by Timothy Lawler » Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 pm

I definitely notice a difference in the "3 dimensional" quality that the (few) great mic's and pre's I've used can get compared to lower end gear.

But the good news, as we all know, is that a really good performance captured on cheap gear is better than the opposite. And having a good sounding room, as you mentioned you've got, is IMO a bigger deal than the gear anyway.

Maybe the biggest bang for the buck I got in upgrading was my Lucid AD converters.

Tim

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests