Using a registed product in your song title?
- joelpatterson
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1732
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 5:20 pm
- Location: Albany, New York
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:09 am
- Location: Ferndale, MI
- Contact:
another fine (I think) example
Apple Corp. (Records) suing for round two with Apple Computers.
The link below has an article laying out information for those not familar with this case...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 00,00.html
In monsters situation they went to trade mark hundreds of things... Like clothes, food, etc enabling them to sue different companies. Maybe trading marking in hopes of one day the Brand Monster would grow into many different lines... or not.
The link below has an article laying out information for those not familar with this case...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 00,00.html
In monsters situation they went to trade mark hundreds of things... Like clothes, food, etc enabling them to sue different companies. Maybe trading marking in hopes of one day the Brand Monster would grow into many different lines... or not.
-
- alignin' 24-trk
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:42 am
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- snuffinthepunk
- pushin' record
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:59 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN/Destin, FL
- Contact:
Same thing happened with Kleenex tissues. Now anyone can put the word "kleenex" on their box. I'm not an expert, but, in my one month music business course we learned more than enough to stop a company like Monster from suing other people who use the word "monster." Like yall said, it's completely unrelated and therefore is protected from infringement suits. I can't believe Monster (TM) got away with all that.Professor wrote:Provided you have the resources to fight it. But unless you have a few hundred grand to blow on proving that, it ain't worth tempting the fight. And somehow Monster cable continues to sue huge companies like:ubertar wrote:Sure, they could sue you for it, but they wouldn't win.
-- Walt Disney Co., which distributed Pixar Animation Studios' hit film "Monsters, Inc.''
-- Bally Gaming International Inc. for its Monster Slots.
-- Hansen Beverage Co. for a Monster Energy drink.
-- The Chicago Bears, whose nickname is "Monsters of the Midway.''
That's according to this article.
But if you want some encouragement, of a very strange type, then you might consider the reverse problem that faced the Thermos company. About ten years ago their ownership of the trademarked name "Thermos" was revoked by the USPTO because the name had become so synonymous with the 'insulated beverage bottles' that other businesses complained they could not market their products in fair competition. The PTO agreed and revoked the name and now anyone can sell thermos bottles, and Thermos can sell 'Thermos-Brand insulated bottles' or 'Original Thermos Bottles' or derivations like that, but that's still not so useful when everyone else can sell plain old "thermos" bottles. Needless to say, the decision had companies like Xerox, Rollerblade and Jet-Ski shaking in their boots.
So what Monster Cable really needs is a lawsuit against them from that angle, or perhaps a lawsuit from the owners of a few old monster movies that would have a copyright registration that predates Monster Cable.
-Jeremy
"no dream is worth being underachieved"
I love signal flow.
Imagine the possibilities!
www.primalgear.com
I love signal flow.
Imagine the possibilities!
www.primalgear.com
- snuffinthepunk
- pushin' record
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:59 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN/Destin, FL
- Contact:
Re: another fine (I think) example
if I am correctly informed, you have two(?) years before you have to give up your trademark if you aren't using it for profit (unless it's like, a non-profit organization type thing). I can understand the clothing bit (maybe they sell t-shirts on line or something...however that amount of profit [which would be little] and the fact that they have absolutely no association with a clothing company [how many people out there know "monster" is a cable/wiring manufacturer? audiophiles only probably] should be enough to stop monster in the first place.). Why would a huge company go after people who couldn't afford to pay them anyway? fucking bullies.Effigy Studios wrote:Apple Corp. (Records) suing for round two with Apple Computers.
The link below has an article laying out information for those not familar with this case...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 00,00.html
In monsters situation they went to trade mark hundreds of things... Like clothes, food, etc enabling them to sue different companies. Maybe trading marking in hopes of one day the Brand Monster would grow into many different lines... or not.
Last edited by snuffinthepunk on Thu May 25, 2006 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"no dream is worth being underachieved"
I love signal flow.
Imagine the possibilities!
www.primalgear.com
I love signal flow.
Imagine the possibilities!
www.primalgear.com
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:16 pm
- Location: Denver, CO
- Contact:
Re: Using a registed product in your song title?
True, but "AKA Driver" is on John Henry, not Lincoln.pantone247 wrote:AKA Drive on TMBG's Lincon record, was Nyquil driver...
-
- mixes from purgatory
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 12:34 am
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
That reminds me, someone told me yesterday that one part of sony is part of this internet download site and another part of sony is sueing that site for using it's material, so sony sues sony, bizarre.ubertar wrote:Interesting article in the Times-- Apple Corps is suing Apple computer:
This puts all of those lawyer jokes into perspective now. I have a couple of Monster? cables that philosophically I don't think I'm going to use anymore. I'll probably eat the cost, switch them out and ship them back to Monster Cable? with a few exerpts of news stories about their inane and sensless suits and note that they've lost many customers based on their bullshit practices.
"Don't hurt yourself buddy... I'll go to Big Choice Video instead!"
Earlier in the thread, Professor mentioned "friends don't let friends use Monster Cables..." I'm proud of myself for this one: http://messageboard.tapeop.com/viewtopic.php?t=34839
"Don't hurt yourself buddy... I'll go to Big Choice Video instead!"
Earlier in the thread, Professor mentioned "friends don't let friends use Monster Cables..." I'm proud of myself for this one: http://messageboard.tapeop.com/viewtopic.php?t=34839
I'm all about a little kick and snare
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 9:01 am
- Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Not to worry about Monster Cable...the poor design, lack of quality & longevity of their cables will be their demise. Perhaps the name should be changed to MONSTROSITY! Seriously, what idiot designed their molded XLR ends so fat that they will not fit through a Shure mic stand adapter? Aren't molded plugs generally considered to be crap anyway? I know that the Monster plugs certainly are. Their cable may be ok, but as long as they continue to mold their xlr ends, my studio will never see them.
"The digital future sucks the boils off my white ass." McHugh
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests