McKinney article: more audiophile b.s.

Feedback on the current issue, ideas for articles, questions about Tape Op

Moderators: TapeOpJohn, TapeOpLarry

Miles
audio school graduate
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2003 11:14 am

McKinney article: more audiophile b.s.

Post by Miles » Mon May 29, 2006 10:06 am

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the "Behind the Gear" article about Danny McKinney in the May/June issue. There is an appalling amount of audiophile goofiness: tube power supplies sound "lush and beautiful", audio cables need to "break in" to sound good, and (my favorite) he thinks the hyperexpensive power cables he installed in a studio a year earlier sound "amazing". It's pissing me off that this kind of audiophile b.s. is starting to show up unchallenged in my beloved Tapeop.

User avatar
dokushoka
buyin' a studio
Posts: 811
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: San Francisco / L.A.
Contact:

Post by dokushoka » Mon May 29, 2006 11:53 am

Maybe its not BS?

The fact is, the better your monitoring gets, the more you start to notice how these seemingly "small" things do make a difference.

User avatar
Randy
tinnitus
Posts: 1078
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:54 am
Location: Minneapolis
Contact:

Post by Randy » Mon May 29, 2006 12:22 pm

I have heard the difference between a weak power supply and a strong power supply on the same piece of gear, so I imagine a nice fat wire bringing the power to the power supply will make a difference. How much of a difference? who knows. If you need to have a mastering setup to detect the differences when most folks are listening through computer speakers and iPod earbuds, I'd say the difference is less than negligible.
not to worry, just keep tracking....

spankenstein
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 639
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:58 pm

Post by spankenstein » Mon May 29, 2006 1:17 pm

I take a big issue with the power cables, the ones that go from the wall outlet to the gear. Of the hundreds of miles of high voltage lines, the transformers, the breakers, the hundreds of feet of romex connected with wire nuts... that last 1m of cable is going to make a difference?

Miles
audio school graduate
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2003 11:14 am

Post by Miles » Mon May 29, 2006 3:00 pm

When Danny McK. demonstrates his ability to "hear" the differences among power cables and correctly identify "broken in" cables in controlled blind ABX tests, I'll stop ridiculing him. Until he or anybody believes him is willing to do that, his claims are unsubstantiated bullshit.

Miles

User avatar
dokushoka
buyin' a studio
Posts: 811
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: San Francisco / L.A.
Contact:

Post by dokushoka » Mon May 29, 2006 3:47 pm

spankenstein wrote:I take a big issue with the power cables, the ones that go from the wall outlet to the gear. Of the hundreds of miles of high voltage lines, the transformers, the breakers, the hundreds of feet of romex connected with wire nuts... that last 1m of cable is going to make a difference?
If the power is transformer isolated from the street, it could.

User avatar
dokushoka
buyin' a studio
Posts: 811
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: San Francisco / L.A.
Contact:

Post by dokushoka » Mon May 29, 2006 3:48 pm

Miles wrote:When Danny McK. demonstrates his ability to "hear" the differences among power cables and correctly identify "broken in" cables in controlled blind ABX tests, I'll stop ridiculing him. Until he or anybody believes him is willing to do that, his claims are unsubstantiated bullshit.

Miles
Better yet, one could record two identical sources with it, then flip the phase on one of the tracks to see if you get perfect cancelation...

To play devil's advocate, have you done any testing?

nestle
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 12:11 pm
Location: around somewhere

Post by nestle » Mon May 29, 2006 7:56 pm

well I didn't want to believe that cable could make a big difference but someone gave me one of those BLUE cables as a gift. All of a sudden I really noticed a leap in the quality of my mics. I didn't want to face up to it becuase it was expensive and unsexy to recable my set-up. But after making the leap and redoing all the critical chains with top shelf cable it made a huge difference in noise and fidelity.
Now PSU I cannot say and I ain't going there, but my eyes/ears were opened with the audio cable shit...it was worth it ($300)
the artical that chapped my ass most was the David gilmour fat rockstar barge, what a wanker...too much money, wonder what syd records on

User avatar
jmiller
steve albini likes it
Posts: 396
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 12:53 am
Location: North Hollywood, on Radford near the In-N-Out

Post by jmiller » Mon May 29, 2006 9:36 pm

Miles wrote:When Danny McK. demonstrates his ability to "hear" the differences among power cables and correctly identify "broken in" cables in controlled blind ABX tests, I'll stop ridiculing him. Until he or anybody believes him is willing to do that, his claims are unsubstantiated bullshit.

Miles
Well, you haven't yet proven them to be bullshit, so they are merely like uh, his opinion, man.

TapeOpLarry
TapeOp Admin
TapeOp Admin
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 11:50 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by TapeOpLarry » Mon May 29, 2006 10:02 pm

"It's pissing me off that this kind of audiophile b.s. is starting to show up unchallenged in my beloved Tapeop."

If we run an interview with someone, the invariably have opinions. It doesn't mean I agree 100% with an opinion when we run it - Tape Op is a forum for creative music recording and whatever means people find needed to record are valid. I find it interesting that there are so many opinions and ways to make a recording, and that's why we keep talking to all these people.

it'd be nice for someone to notice that we frequently do Behind the Gear interviews with folks who DO NOT advertise with us by the way...
Larry Crane, Editor/Founder Tape Op Magazine
please visit www.tapeop.com for contact information
(do not send private messages via this board!)
www.larry-crane.com

User avatar
sirbergersworth
audio school graduate
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:05 pm
Location: STL, MO

Post by sirbergersworth » Tue May 30, 2006 9:07 am

I know this for sure. my PC is a lot more creamy sounding and has a lower noise floor when no power cable is plugged in :shock:

I was reading that article yesterday and I actually thought it sounded logical. At least the part about the tube rectifier sounding different than the solid state.
http://www.myspace.com/sirbergersworth

"In the long run, we only hit what we aim at."
-Henry David Thoreau

User avatar
Randy
tinnitus
Posts: 1078
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:54 am
Location: Minneapolis
Contact:

Post by Randy » Tue May 30, 2006 9:29 am

TapeOpLarry wrote:it'd be nice for someone to notice that we frequently do Behind the Gear interviews with folks who DO NOT advertise with us by the way...
Yes! and also on that note, there are tons of gear reviews on stuff that is not advertised in the magazine, and reviews on stuff that is no longer made but obtainable used. Also, there are reviews on useful stuff that isn't even *made* for recording- companies that would never have TapeOp on their marketing radar.

Also, it is a good thing that the people who make the gear are that deep into the sound of their work that they can tell such subtle differences. It doesn't mean we have to go that deep into it, but we can use the gear knowing attention has been paid.

It's funny none of this flack came up after the Pink Floyd interview. They were talking about the direction of current through the cable.
not to worry, just keep tracking....

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Tue May 30, 2006 12:46 pm

Randy wrote: It's funny none of this flack came up after the Pink Floyd interview. They were talking about the direction of current through the cable.
It came up...just not here. :wink:


But I agree with Larry. It's the dude's opinion. We don't need a response from the loyal opposition every time someone makes a statement about gear in TapeOp. If somebody thinks SM57s suck or tube power supplies are the bee's knees, and he makes good records, he should say so...and the reader can decide whether he agrees, and whether to apply that philosophy in his own recordings.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

User avatar
Randy
tinnitus
Posts: 1078
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:54 am
Location: Minneapolis
Contact:

Post by Randy » Tue May 30, 2006 1:52 pm

dwlb wrote:...and the reader can decide whether he agrees, and whether to apply that philosophy in his own recordings.
Well said!
not to worry, just keep tracking....

User avatar
xpulsar
pushin' record
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 7:55 pm
Location: Nashville , TN
Contact:

Re: McKinney article: more audiophile b.s.

Post by xpulsar » Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:24 am

Miles wrote:I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the "Behind the Gear" article about Danny McKinney in the May/June issue. There is an appalling amount of audiophile goofiness: tube power supplies sound "lush and beautiful", audio cables need to "break in" to sound good, and (my favorite) he thinks the hyperexpensive power cables he installed in a studio a year earlier sound "amazing". It's pissing me off that this kind of audiophile b.s. is starting to show up unchallenged in my beloved Tapeop.
I don't really agree with most of the audiofile nonsense. But i will say that when it comes to Power supplies,they deffinately affect how an audio circuit is functioning. A tube rectifier over a solidstate one is very different. Have you ever sat down and changed out tubes in a Guitar amp or Mic pre and listen to how it changes the sound?

What about trying out different mic cables Canari, Mogami,Beldin,Monster,Blue....$
Some mic cables have a french braid sheilding that deffinately cuts down on RF which in turn affects the High frequency response of a source. This is a proven fact.
What about microphonics in a cable,have you ever experienced that? It exsists.

I would say that what works for that person is more important to their music than what other people think is important.

I have seen all kinds of methods used and I go back to the ones that work for me. Besides why not let someone else spend all their money on expensive speaker cables and ceramic triangles to keep that expensive speaker cable off of the ground.

HA

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests