RegisterRegister
Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages
Log inLog in
FAQ  -  SEARCH  -  MEMBERS  -  FAVORITES  -  PROFILE
debunking the '600 ohm' inputs for tube gear

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    Tape Op Message Board Forum Index -> DIY Gear
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
themagicmanmdt
george martin


Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 1339
Location: home on the range

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:10 pm    Post subject: debunking the '600 ohm' inputs for tube gear Reply with quote

so...

a transformer is, primarily, a impedance 'reflector', to put it simplified.

in relation to the turns ratio, as well as impedance termination to ground, thus reflects impedance to the other side of the transformer, as well as current and voltage gains/losses.

so....

there's quite a few times when i'm reviewing schematics for tube gear that has a transformer input (specifically mic input transformers), and I find it interesting that, say, there's a 1:10 input transformer that terminated into the first stage grid resistor of 220k... or, sometimes, 1M.

if the grid resistor was 220k; 1:10 turns ratio is a 1:100 impedance ratio: 220k/100 is a load impedance as seen by the mic as 2.2k.

a 1M grid resistor would be 10K as seen by the mic. (!)

these are all figures, of course, for transformers that behave fine without having to strap a load resistor on the primary for correcting frequency response or other issues with the transformer design or implementation.


is this thinking accurate? am i missing something? (i always defer my conclusions out for possible errors).

perhaps... lots of tube gear has always been terminating mics beyond and past the 600ohm input impedance we've been told is linked with older gear...


further, other 'line' input devices are about the same: a 1:4 line input transformer, but terminated into 220k... that's about 14k!



of course, this is a 'some, not all' post.... but may help explain certain preamps having different sounds in the tube days.



eh?
_________________
we are the village green
preservation society
god bless +6 tape
valves and serviceability

*now tech and QC shaman at shadow hills industries*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Scodiddly
TOMB Moderator
TOMB Moderator


Joined: 10 Dec 2003
Posts: 3261
Location: Libertyville, IL, USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:28 am    Post subject: Re: debunking the '600 ohm' inputs for tube gear Reply with quote

At this point the 600 ohm thing is somewhat of a historical footnote. "Back when the telephone company hadn't even invented the first amplifier", and they had to transfer passive signals long distances. So it was all about maximum power transfer. Ma Bell knew a *lot* about transformer design back in the day.

In the modern age (which goes back to maybe WWII for pro audio?) we've had relatively cheap amplification and so the exact impedance matching isn't as much of an issue. So mic input impedances do tend to be several thousand ohms, which makes it possible to split a source between more than one mixing console and other useful tricks. And tubes are much happier at high impedances anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RodC
dead but not forgotten


Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 2039
Location: Right outside the door

PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:30 pm    Post subject: Re: debunking the '600 ohm' inputs for tube gear Reply with quote

I think I have posed this about 100 times, Shure article that helps you calculate the loss and explains this a bit more.

http://tinyurl.com/el9bh
_________________
'Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones'

http://www.beyondsanityproductions.com
http://www.myspace.com/beyondsanity
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
The Scum
dead but not forgotten


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 2229
Location: Denver, CO

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:13 am    Post subject: Re: debunking the '600 ohm' inputs for tube gear Reply with quote

I'm not doublechecking your math, but it looks like you've got the concept.

One other piece of it is that the stated specs for a transformer are it's design parameters...they describe how it will be optimally applied. That doesn't mean that it stops working when loaded differently...though the frequency response and other characteristics may be less than ideal as you get away from the design parameters, and won't correlate to the mfr's docs.

600 Ohms is the characteristic impedance of small gauge wires hanging from telegraph/telephone poles.

When wires get significantly long (longer than 1/4 wavelength of the frequency in question, but at the speed of electrons in copper, not sound in air), they start to show effects similar to room acoustics. And the results are similar - nodes, modes, standing and traveling waves, etc. Matching the source, line and load minimizes those effects.

My father wrote a bunch of animation stuff to demonstrate these effects...but unless you've got Matlab, they'd just be useless source files...though searching youtube for "transmission line animation" will pull up some similar stuff.

Outside of the phone and power companies, we don't see too many transmission lines in analog audio. Thus matching is somewhat moot in most studio circumstances. Word clock and video cables are a different story.

There are some other effects to be considered. There's that stuff Paul Stamler has done by adding a load resistor to an SM57, to smooth out the presence peak. Resonant systems become much less resonant when heavily loaded. It can really alter a dynamic mic's response...though an active mic shouldn't change much, as the output impedance should be really, really low.

That Shure link sums it up nicely. I don't think I'd ever seen that before.
_________________
"What fer?"
"Cat fur, to make kitten britches."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
themagicmanmdt
george martin


Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 1339
Location: home on the range

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:32 pm    Post subject: Re: debunking the '600 ohm' inputs for tube gear Reply with quote

RodC wrote:
I think I have posed this about 100 times, Shure article that helps you calculate the loss and explains this a bit more.

http://tinyurl.com/el9bh


i was more of saying that most tube gear seems to already be reflecting loads greater than 600ohms.
_________________
we are the village green
preservation society
god bless +6 tape
valves and serviceability

*now tech and QC shaman at shadow hills industries*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    Tape Op Message Board Forum Index -> DIY Gear All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum