SSL Nucleus v. other control surfaces - opinions?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
Circuit Scream
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:35 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

SSL Nucleus v. other control surfaces - opinions?

Post by Circuit Scream » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:29 am

I'm currently using a Tascam FW-1804, which I'm actually really happy with - but I need a control surface (and/or) mixer for my DAW (Reaper/Windows).

Wondering if I can take this as an opportunity to upgrade my sound, so I'm looking at the SSL Nucleus as an option since I'm more comfortable with an analog workflow.

These are the options I'm considering:

A) SSL Nucleus (either with or without my existing interface OR the Antelope Audio Orion 32)

B) Tascam US-2400 with an Antelope Audio Orion 32

C) Tascam FW-1884 with two additional FE-8 fader banks


Any experience or opinions on these would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
-Donnie
"I avoided capture by using your Mak'tar stealth haze"
--Quellek

Donnie Maynard Christianson
aka Circuit Scream
Sci-fi Inspired Ambient/Electronic Guitar Rock
http://twitter.com/circuitscream

brew
pushin' record
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 2:06 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Post by brew » Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 am

Why do you need 32 outputs (Orion)? Also, Orion doesn't have mic amps.

You generally can't use two interfaces simultaneously, so in example 1 you'd have to pick one or the other, potentially limiting the Nucleus to just a control surface and monitoring.

Nucleus is perfect for mixing ITB, but people with 32 outputs generally aren't doing that. As a surface-only, the advantage it has is customizable shortcuts.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests