RegisterRegister
Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages
Log inLog in
FAQ  -  SEARCH  -  MEMBERS  -  FAVORITES  -  PROFILE
Are you a brand?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    Tape Op Message Board Forum Index -> People Skills
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ubertar
cryogenically thawing


Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 3662
Location: Brooklyn, NY

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 10:19 am    Post subject: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

Thought this was very much on target. From a musician's perspective, it never made any sense to me when rock musicians started getting all cozy with the corporate world, allowing or even pursuing the use of their music in ads. That's when rock died, IMO.

By CARINA CHOCANO in NY Times Magazine

Once, a long time ago, a rock star was a free-spirited, convention-flouting artist/rebel/hero/Dionysian fertility god who fronted a world-famous band, sold millions of records and headlined stadium concerts where people were trampled in frenzies of cultlike fervor. Someone who smashed guitars, trashed hotel rooms, developed Byzantine drug problems and tried to mask evidence of his infidelity with the strategically applied scent of breakfast burritos. Despite what his ‘‘Behind the Music’’ episode would invariably reveal, a ‘‘rock star’’ — or the Platonic ideal of a rock star — was not just a powder keg of charisma and unresolved childhood issues, but a revolutionary driven by a need to assert the primacy of the self in an increasingly alienating commercial world.

Now, 60 years, give or take, since the phrase came into existence, ‘‘rock star’’ has made a complete about-face. In its new incarnation, it is more likely to refer to a programmer, salesperson, social-media strategist, business-to-business telemarketer, recruiter, management consultant or celebrity pastry chef than to a person in a band. The term has become shorthand for a virtuosity so exalted it borders on genius — only for some repetitive, detail-oriented task. It flatters the person being spoken about by shrouding him in mystique while also conferring a Svengali-like power on the person speaking. Posting a listing for a job for which only ‘‘rock stars’’ need apply casts an H.R. manager as a kind of corporate Malcolm McLaren; that nobody is looking for a front-end developer who is addicted to heroin or who bites the heads off doves in conference rooms goes without saying. Pretty much anyone can be a ‘‘rock star’’ these days — except actual rock stars, who are encouraged to think of themselves as brands.

This bizarre transposition goes back to the turn of the millennium, when the idea of a ‘‘creative class’’ was popularized in books like Paul H. Ray and Sherry Ruth Anderson’s ‘‘The Cultural Creatives: How 50 Million People Are Changing the World’’ and Richard Florida’s ‘‘The Rise of the Creative Class,’’ which argued that innovation would drive growth in the 21st century. The creative class, according to these thinkers, valued the cool things in life. More than money and status, they cared about authenticity, activism, ecology and the interconnectedness of all things. They were more egalitarian, more into personal growth. Whereas the popular business literature of the 1980s urged managers to imagine themselves as fierce, merciless warriors (Sun Tzu’s ancient treatise ‘‘The Art of War’’ was required reading for many American executives and business students), by the end of the century, consultants at McKinsey had declared a ‘‘war for talent.’’ Business writers in the new millennium reconceptualized men in suits (or hoodies) as social revolutionaries.

According to a 2013 study in The Human Resource Management Review, ‘‘talent,’’ in its new usage, could refer to qualities, like natural ability and technical mastery, or it could refer to talented people, as in a subset of elite, superskilled workers, or it could mean all people, no matter how untalented. On the HBO show ‘‘Silicon Valley’’ (in which, in a recent episode, a pretty event manager introduced the benightedly dorky programmers Dinesh and Gilfoyle as ‘‘rock stars’’ to her sexy, unimpressed stunt man boyfriend), Nelson Bighetti, known as Big Head, is a prime example of this last category. Big Head is an inept app developer whose swift rise through the ranks of his company, Hooli, makes no sense to his colleagues — which of course it shouldn’t, because it’s all just part of a cynical legal strategy. But Hooli, a very loose spoof of Google, is a faith-driven ‘‘culture’’ led by a ‘‘visionary,’’ Gavin Belson. To doubt his talent for spotting ‘‘talent’’ would border on apostasy. Belson is a ‘‘rock star,’’ and Big Head becomes a rock star by association. ‘‘Silicon Valley’’ nails this particular lexical puffery: the way that language can create power in the most ridiculous, illogical ways. Rock star ad absurdum.

Rock stars themselves bear some responsibility for the creation of brand ‘‘rock stardom.’’ In her book ‘‘No Logo,’’ a study of the effects of advertising on culture, Naomi Klein traces the inversion of artists and corporate wage earners to the 1980s, when seemingly every ’70s rock star who survived youthful hard living into hale middle age entered into a synergistic alliance with other, bigger brands. Comeback concert sponsorships, commercial licensing agreements, lucrative advertising contracts and co-branded merchandising opportunities offered the aging rock star, drifting into irrelevance, advantages only a die-hard romantic and well-funded idealist would turn down: a final, global victory lap; an extra couple of hundred million in the bank; and a shot to trade enshrinement in a specific era for an eternal, ahistoric, ever-fungible brand ‘‘relevance.’’

Who could blame him? A person can sanely assume a countercultural stance only when there is a culture to counter — and by the 1980s, there wasn’t one anymore. Advertising permeated popular culture so thoroughly that it essentially replaced it. This oddity is illustrated by the successful co-opting of the Beatles’ song ‘‘Revolution’’ as the soundtrack to a 1987 Nike commercial. The Beatles sued the sneaker company, the company that created the ad and EMI-Capitol Records for $15 million, claiming that they did not ‘‘endorse or peddle sneakers or pantyhose.’’ This sounds comically innocent now. Now we’re at the point where it seems perfectly normal to see the Rolling Stones’ Keith Richards as the face of Louis Vuitton luggage; last year, Bono announced, while performing at the launch of the Apple Watch, that U2’s album ‘‘Songs of Innocence’’ would be automatically released for free to the accounts of as many as 500 million iTunes users — a great many of whom were evidently not U2 fans. Complaints about the rock star’s attempt to glom onto the launch and about the sullying of the pure Apple brand experience ensued.

A funny thing happens when a brand becomes associated with a rock star in the public imagination. The rock star is gradually subsumed into the permeable and capacious brand like a vanishing twin. And the spirit of rock music is devoured too. The brand itself becomes the star. Which is where we find ourselves now, in the post-rock-star era, reading books like ‘‘The New Rockstar Philosophy’’ that are aimed at helping artists think, and possibly talk, like businesses. (One blurb praises its ‘‘actionable insights.’’) Musicians today know that you have to be a pro to succeed: compliant, controlled, image-focused and customer-service-oriented. Tossing vending machines off balconies is not cost-effective and just sends the wrong message.

Years ago, in the early ’90s, I took a copywriting class at a large Chicago ad agency, and the teacher told us a story about how, a few years earlier, he tried to persuade the indie band Timbuk3 to allow his client ­— I think it was Procter & Gamble — to use its song ‘‘Hairstyles and Attitudes’’ in a commercial, but the musicians refused. I was struck by his contempt for their decision, and how fresh his anger seemed. He kept sputtering the reason they gave for turning down his agency’s offer — ‘‘They didn’t want to sell out!’’ — as if it constituted not just an unthinkable betrayal but also a reprehensible moral lapse. He seemed to expect us to mirror his indignation, but we just sat there, feeling uncomfortable.

Today, not only would the band that wrote the song about hairstyles accept the shampoo company’s offer without hesitating, it would also gratefully participate in any and all cross-promotional efforts, cheerfully splicing its DNA with that of its benevolent sponsors on social media and on TV. It would go on late-night shows and gamely participate in any attendant self-mockery. The copywriter would use it as an example of leveraging brand synergies through 360-degree cross-platform campaigns, and the kids in his class would think he was a rock star.
_________________
New Album!
https://paulrubenstein.bandcamp.com/album/one-eye-awake
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kslight
dead but not forgotten


Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 2168

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 11:13 am    Post subject: Re: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

I'm not really convinced that the rock star in the purest sense (a revolutionary?) ever commonly existed, it was an illusion put forth by their marketing department to sell records and concert tickets to gullible youth looking for some "counter culture" to cling to while "the man" pushes them down. I don't think this is new to the post-internet Apocalypse.

cool jazz, man
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vvv
zen recordist


Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 7930
Location: Chi

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 12:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

As a rock star in my own mind, lo, these many years, I'm still hoping to sell out.

Liked the article BTW, thanx.

Too bad in some ways about Timbuk3; the future is here and we all wanna wear shades.
_________________
bandcamp; vlayman;
THD; blog.
I mix with olive juice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jarvis
takin' a dinner break


Joined: 14 Dec 2003
Posts: 173
Location: the new york

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

among my tribe I am considered a Behringer
_________________
Ivan the Threadstopper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Sevilla
speech impediment


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 4445
Location: Los Angeles California USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

I hate that term, "Rock Star".

It was good in the 1970s, when there was rock.

But then rock died.

This new incarnation is a spawn from SatanCorp Inc.
_________________
The Song. Nothing else really matters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
floid
re-cappin' neve


Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 736
Location: in exile

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

Anybody remember the last song on The Young Fresh Fellows' Doc Sharpie? It's a recipe for how to make a rock song. The final ingredient is "some parents to say, 'Turn down that racket! They call that music? I'm getting a TERRIBLE headache.'"
But rock is now, what, three or four generations deep in our culture. The 'rents may not like what's coming out of Junior and Missy's earbuds, but they remember the day when something not so different was coming out of their own childhood bedrooms. So do a the grandparents. And so it becomes a phase, something expected. Which comes around to something I think has plagued 'rock' for a long time, if not from the very start: the rebellion it claims to embody is really just another form of conformity - to the point that pop culture has begun to portray "the weird kid" as listening to something like dixieland jazz or crooners, and the "youth in revolt" and musopic films have become aware of their own memes.
_________________
Village Idiot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vvv
zen recordist


Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 7930
Location: Chi

PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 4:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

I'm thinkin' it's like a rock-n-roll Henry James thing, where we are all just characters inna Springsteen, or Lady GaGa, or mebbe NWA song ...

Twisted Evil
_________________
bandcamp; vlayman;
THD; blog.
I mix with olive juice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
apropos of nothing
dead but not forgotten


Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 2181
Location: Hillsborough, NC

PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:18 am    Post subject: Re: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

Like a true nature's child, we were born, born to be mild.
_________________
-Jj
How to Tell Chaos from Anything Else
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jarvis
takin' a dinner break


Joined: 14 Dec 2003
Posts: 173
Location: the new york

PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 7:37 am    Post subject: Re: Are you a brand? Reply with quote

I'm afraid that if I achieve rock stardom it's gonna fuck with my medicaid.
_________________
Ivan the Threadstopper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    Tape Op Message Board Forum Index -> People Skills All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum