Message Board

SOLD

Babaluma wrote:i'd say less compression/greater dynamic range.

This

Price drop to $650 before it goes on fleebay.

bump

Whoops!

Sorry it's an MC-202.

Cheers otto-bot. I'll post up a pic when I get a minute.

One of the fattest analogue monosynths on the planet. This one is in mint condition apart from a hairline crack on the corner of the LCD screen. This doesnt affect the use of the screen at all. No scratchy pots or sliders and the battery compartment is clean as a whistle. Makes sub bass that puts a ...

From what I remember it sounds like a low passed reese bass. Two detuned square or sawtooth waveforms, some distortion, effects such as phaser and chorus, maybe some reverb, maybe some more distortion and more effects. Once the sound is really narly then you chuck on a lowpass filter and you have a ...

SM7b all the way.

Pick one up second hand. There's not much that can go wrong with them.

SM7b on vocals sounds great. Very warm and natural. I usually add a bit of UAD Pultec 12khz boost.

Check out the Baby feat. Prince Zimboo by Major Lazer.

I'd still probably compress then eq but try both and see what sounds best.

Yes true.

Is this project completely tape based or are you bouncing to a DAW at some stage?

mjau wrote:Try both. I tend to prefer cutting before the compressor, and boosting afterward, but it's not a hard and fast rule.

Same here

Compression also raises the noise floor so it's definitely a juggling act.

Or a UBK Fatso

I'd get the 2500.