what happened to the Kinks when recording?

Feedback on the current issue, ideas for articles, questions about Tape Op

Moderators: TapeOpJohn, TapeOpLarry

brownplus
studio intern
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:41 pm
Location: greensboring NC

what happened to the Kinks when recording?

Post by brownplus » Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:53 pm

Have always been curious as to why a large part of the Kinks recordings sound so ....undynamic? flat? While a fan of the Beatles, i find myself enjoying and listening to the underappreciated Kinks much more often. Granted, Kronicles sounds like it was put together with one fader up and the rest in the trash can; but other earlier recordings sound dim?
Maybe I just gravitate towards this? Like the wonderful world of early guided by voices?

How about a dedicated issue to underappreciated bands....my votes go to the aforementioned plus:
Afghan Whigs, Libertines, Andy Fairweather Low, Nick Lowe, Sleater Kinney, Big star, Television....I mean, all of these plus more should be as commonly known at least as well known as....Def Leppard? HA!
i can't look back at all the stuff i sold...its like looking back at worldcom stock sold the day after

small amps. big strings and single coils

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:12 pm

FWIW, I think Afghan Whigs records ("Gentlemen" and "1965" specifically) are really well-recorded.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

User avatar
johnny7
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 406
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by johnny7 » Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:29 pm

Have you listened to their BBC release?
That first CD is great!
J

jckinnick
buyin' a studio
Posts: 924
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 2:50 pm

Post by jckinnick » Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:16 pm

I love the Kinks records I think there recorded great. Obviously there not Beatles quality though, wich record are you referring to?

jckinnick
buyin' a studio
Posts: 924
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 2:50 pm

Re: what happened to the Kinks when recording?

Post by jckinnick » Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:18 pm

brownplus wrote: How about a dedicated issue to underappreciated bands....my votes go to the aforementioned plus:
Afghan Whigs, Libertines, Andy Fairweather Low, Nick Lowe, Sleater Kinney, Big star, Television....I mean, all of these plus more should be as commonly known at least as well known as....Def Leppard? HA!
Big Star and Tom Valerine were in the last couple of issues.

TapeOpLarry
TapeOp Admin
TapeOp Admin
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 11:50 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by TapeOpLarry » Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:19 am

People don't know about the Libertines? I guess I read UK press too much.

Sleater-Kinney - I recorded 2 of their albums so you won't see an interview with me! Look for John Goodmanson's interview way back. As a rule we don't cover bands that often, but when it falls into place (Ardent Studios, where Jody of Big Star works) then it makes sense, or if it's an artist with a lot of LPs out and they can elaborate on the process (Robyn Hitchcock).

Nick Lowe is on the drawing board if it works out. Would be cool.
Larry Crane, Editor/Founder Tape Op Magazine
please visit www.tapeop.com for contact information
(do not send private messages via this board!)
www.larry-crane.com

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:54 am

TapeOpLarry wrote:Nick Lowe is on the drawing board if it works out. Would be cool.
Cool. Ask him what he thought of the Lowe Profile tribute CD on Brewery. There are a lot of TapeOp folks on that disc.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

TapeOpLarry
TapeOp Admin
TapeOp Admin
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 11:50 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by TapeOpLarry » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:25 am

Nick Lowe won't do interviews for gear or recording magazines, it turns out.
Larry Crane, Editor/Founder Tape Op Magazine
please visit www.tapeop.com for contact information
(do not send private messages via this board!)
www.larry-crane.com

swelle
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 195
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:46 pm

Post by swelle » Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:39 pm

I don't really think you can consider Big Star underappreciated at this point; they're one of the most critically slobbered-all-over bands for the last 15 years.

I'd vote for Jimmy Campbell and Rockin Horse though!
(Whom, incidentally, someone kindly set up a myspace page for... I just found out he passed away recently.)http://www.myspace.com/jimmycampbell1

User avatar
wrenhunter
pushin' record
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: what happened to the Kinks when recording?

Post by wrenhunter » Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:53 pm

brownplus wrote:Have always been curious as to why a large part of the Kinks recordings sound so ....undynamic? flat? While a fan of the Beatles, i find myself enjoying and listening to the underappreciated Kinks much more often. Granted, Kronicles sounds like it was put together with one fader up and the rest in the trash can; but other earlier recordings sound dim?!
Not sure that it sheds light on your question in detail, but I just finished reading this volume of the 33 1/3 series. It does cover some of their recording, and is a great read for Kinks fans in general.

Shame about Nick Lowe. I like all his stuff -- Rockpile, solo, Little Village. Would be cool to hear about all that.
All the boys with their homemade microphones have very interesting sounds. -- Dan Behar

coniferouspine
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Re: what happened to the Kinks when recording?

Post by coniferouspine » Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:33 pm

brownplus wrote:Have always been curious as to why a large part of the Kinks recordings sound so ....undynamic? flat? While a fan of the Beatles, i find myself enjoying and listening to the underappreciated Kinks much more often. Granted, Kronicles sounds like it was put together with one fader up and the rest in the trash can; but other earlier recordings sound dim?
Undynamic, flat...I know exactly what you mean! I've always suspected that it had to do with the fact that (a) on the early stuff, Shel Talmy was their producer, a guy not exactly known for his fidelity or great sounds (b) when Ray Davies took over the production helm with "Waterloo Sunset," because Talmy had been his "teacher," perhaps he just didn't have the technical know-how to get really great sounds in a self-production. Compare this to say the Rolling Stones, who by the time they took over their own production duties had plenty of experience watching/learning in American studios in LA, Chicago, and elsewhere, also working with Glyn Johns etc., or a case like the Beatles who basically had Geoff Emerick/George Martin and had the run of Abbey Road almost to themselves with unlimited budgets to work on things. I mean most of the classic Kinks stuff was recorded where, Pye Studios? I dunno, that's not exactly a house hold name as far as legendary '60s studios go, it's pretty far down the list. Lola vs. Powerman sounds better, probably the best sounding album of the lot. That was done at Morgan Studios, which is where Led Zeppelin and Blind Faith also recorded. I suspect they went up a notch on the studio budget for that one, because at that point they knew they needed a solid radio hit and were trying very consciously and deliberately to get a hit record.

The later RCA records in the '70s, part of the weird fidelity was probably due to the fact that the '70s albums were mostly recording in their own studio, Konk studios, which although I'm sure it was a great place was probably not quite as well-equipped or designed as say an Olympic or something. They built it themselves over a long period of time, and so like any home made space I could kinda see it maybe not quite living up to what everybody had hoped for, once you get all the gear in. Actually, the way Kinks records sound is not so big of a surprise, when you consider that it's Ray Davies, who is always touted as such a literate SONGWRITER, STORYTELLER dude, combined with his brother DAVE who is KING OF THE GRITTY RIFF. With that kind of one-two sibling rivalry in charge of the band and basically producing themselves, you can kinda see how their attitude towards recording might have been like -- drum sounds, miking up the piano better, getting a richer bass tone? Who CARES?
"Every song needs a cranked marshall for mojo, even if decorum requires muting the track."

thethingwiththestuff
george martin
Posts: 1296
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:00 pm
Location: philly

Post by thethingwiththestuff » Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:16 pm

um...... some of my favorite sounding records are village green, something else, arthur...







do i look bad now?

User avatar
curtiswyant
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 729
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:08 pm
Location: Boston

Post by curtiswyant » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:33 am

thethingwiththestuff wrote:um...... some of my favorite sounding records are village green, something else, arthur...







do i look bad now?
I agree Village Green sounds great, but it's definitely not "hi-fi"

vsr600
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:32 am
Location: Memphis, TN

Post by vsr600 » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:54 am

dwlb wrote:FWIW, I think Afghan Whigs records ("Gentlemen" and "1965" specifically) are really well-recorded.
My friend Jeffrey was the assistant engineer on Gentlemen and effects editor on Black Love at Ardent in Memphis. http://www.taprootaudiodesign.com/discography.html

minkthinking
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 9:06 am
Contact:

Post by minkthinking » Thu Aug 23, 2007 1:23 am

god, too bad that Nick Lowe won't do gear interviews...

those drums on "heart of the city"!

nick lowe... genius

behold his trilogy about the bay city rollers!

amazing.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests