Re-Amping "Another dumb Question"

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
User avatar
Ryan Silva
tinnitus
Posts: 1229
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:46 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re-Amping "Another dumb Question"

Post by Ryan Silva » Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:42 pm

Heres what i'm trying to do.. I am sending a track out of my DAW (nuendo 3) into a Big Muff Pedal and then passing it back in. Always works with Line Level gear, but not with pedals is this because of an impedence miss match? Is there a way around it with out a Re-Amp Box?


:roll: Sorry so dumb
"Writing good songs is hard. recording is easy. "

MoreSpaceEcho

User avatar
Fletcher
steve albini likes it
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 7:38 am
Location: M?nchen
Contact:

Post by Fletcher » Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:31 am

Every now and again you can almost get away with dropping the level going into the pedal [especially if it's a fuzz box]... but you will generally pick up a shitload of unwanted noise on the return.

A re-amp/DI rig is really the way to go but like I said, sometimes, if the input level to the stomp box is low enough you can kinda get away without one.

Best of luck.

KennyLusk
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Ramah, New Mexico

Post by KennyLusk » Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:44 am

I agree with Fletcher on that. If you keep the voltage low you might get away with it. The muff pedal is looking for a low voltage, unbalanced, high impedence signal which is where a passive DI box is the 'best' tool to use as a buffer. Run the signal In through the Out door to the big muff at low volume and you'll get a nice clean signal you can work with usually. Works for me anyhow with an amp or stomp box (no matter how cheap the DI).
"The mushroom states its own position very clearly. It says, "I require the nervous system of a mammal. Do you have one handy?" Terrence McKenna

User avatar
syrupcore
deaf.
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 4:40 am
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

Post by syrupcore » Tue Mar 07, 2006 1:34 am

I use the passive DI method as well. just make sure it's passive. I got some 50 dollar thing. works great.

playinbass
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 5:09 am
Location: boston

Post by playinbass » Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:27 am

Really?...just running the signal in "backwards" through a passive DI box will work (kinda) for re-amping?

KennyLusk
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Ramah, New Mexico

Post by KennyLusk » Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:07 am

playinbass wrote:Really?...just running the signal in "backwards" through a passive DI box will work (kinda) for re-amping?
Yeah, you just run the balanced line level signal into the output of the DI box and connect to your amplifier [or re-amp speakers] from the unbalanced input jack of the DI box.

Just be careful of your volume levels from the source. At the source, start with your volume set to 0 and bring the program level up slowly.
"The mushroom states its own position very clearly. It says, "I require the nervous system of a mammal. Do you have one handy?" Terrence McKenna

User avatar
Jeff White
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3263
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jeff White » Tue Mar 07, 2006 9:40 am

playinbass wrote:
Really?...just running the signal in "backwards" through a passive DI box will work (kinda) for re-amping?

Yeah, you just run the balanced line level signal into the output of the DI box and connect to your amplifier [or re-amp speakers] from the unbalanced input jack of the DI box.

Just be careful of your volume levels from the source. At the source, start with your volume set to 0 and bring the program level up slowly.
I have 3 or 4 older DOD passive DI boxes hanging around. Is there any way to simply convert one of them to an actual nice sounding REamp box? Has anyone done this?

Jeff

KennyLusk
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Ramah, New Mexico

Post by KennyLusk » Tue Mar 07, 2006 1:18 pm

skycave wrote:
I have 3 or 4 older DOD passive DI boxes hanging around. Is there any way to simply convert one of them to an actual nice sounding REamp box? Has anyone done this?

Jeff
You shouldn't have any problem with the quality of your DOD boxes Jeff. They should be nice and quiet, especially if they were manufactured in the early eighties. Either way, the key is to watch your volume (voltage) levels coming In thru the Out door. Piece of cake.
"The mushroom states its own position very clearly. It says, "I require the nervous system of a mammal. Do you have one handy?" Terrence McKenna

User avatar
Jeff White
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3263
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jeff White » Tue Mar 07, 2006 1:19 pm

You shouldn't have any problem with the quality of your DOD boxes Jeff. They should be nice and quiet, especially if they were manufactured in the early eighties. Either way, the key is to watch your volume (voltage) levels coming In thru the Out door. Piece of cake.
Sweet. Thanks!

Jeff

User avatar
Fletcher
steve albini likes it
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 7:38 am
Location: M?nchen
Contact:

Post by Fletcher » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:49 pm

skycave wrote:I have 3 or 4 older DOD passive DI boxes hanging around. Is there any way to simply convert one of them to an actual nice sounding REamp box? Has anyone done this?
Yes, everyone who has made a 're-amp' box has done this... you have hit 90% of the crux of the biscuit on how a re-amp box works. It's a passive DI working backwards [there is some 'voodoo' in some of them which would be the other 10% after the 90].

My bad for not mentioning that earlier, I erroneously assumed that was obvious.

User avatar
Jeff White
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3263
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jeff White » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:12 pm

I always assumed that this was one way of doing things, then doubted my logic because of the fact that most Re-Amp boxes on the market are in the $200 price range.

I use my Presonus MP20 as my DI at home / remote, so opening up and experimenting with the DOD DI boxes won't hurt.

Thanks for the info.

Jeff

User avatar
jv
pushin' record
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by jv » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:55 pm

skycave wrote:I always assumed that this was one way of doing things, then doubted my logic because of the fact that most Re-Amp boxes on the market are in the $200 price range.

I use my Presonus MP20 as my DI at home / remote, so opening up and experimenting with the DOD DI boxes won't hurt.

Thanks for the info.

Jeff
If you want to open up a passive DI and mess around with it, you can
make something pretty close to a Re-Amp (I would guess).
The Jensen website has a nice schematic:

http://www.jensen-transformers.com/as/as092.pdf

What this does is 3 things:
1. Convert balanced signal to unbalanced.
2. Provide a high(er) output impedence.
3. Lower the level.

Using a normal passive DI in reverse accomplishes 1 & 2, but it
actually raises the level, so you have to lower it going into the DI.

If you took apart a DOD DI and modified it, you'd probably want
to reverse the transformer so it drops the level, and add level and
impedance pots as shown in the jensen schematic (you could probably
skip the impedance pot and replace it with a resistor or just a wire if
you wanted it to be a little simpler).

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 69 guests