What is your soundcard latency setting?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
User avatar
justinf
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:31 pm
Location: charlotte

What is your soundcard latency setting?

Post by justinf » Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:28 am

For those that are using soundcards with adjustable latency: what is your optimal setting?

Mine has traditionally been 7ms at 44.1, but in scrutinizing mixes this weekend we noticed some tiny latency issues that prompted me to bump to the next setting, 13ms. This is unfortunately a perceptible difference when tracking, so I may find that tracking is best at 7 and mixing at 13.

Just wondering what you guys are working with. Incidentally, my Mini-Me over USB 2 clocks in at a tortoise-like 35ms--pretty damn unacceptable imho. Firewire card is due out be the year end. . .

User avatar
cvanwinkle
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:23 am
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Contact:

Post by cvanwinkle » Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:19 pm

Generally I try to go as low without choking as I can while recording. And I go with much higher settings during playback unless it takes too much time to start playback after I press the spacebar (i.e. the buffer is so big that it gets annoying).

IMHO there isn't necessarily an "optimal" setting

However, if you're using ASIO, a lot of ASIO hosts use the same buffer size for your VST plugins as the setting you set for your ASIO card. Which means that your granularity in your effects and the automation of their parameters happens every 512 samples (if your buffer is 512 samples).

So for playback, you need to have a higher buffer setting to hear smooth playback without dropouts but it is at the cost of granularity. If you're doing a non-realtime bounce, you can lower down the setting as far as you can. It'll take longer to bounce, but may come up with better results.

-C

User avatar
klangtone
pushin' record
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:25 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Post by klangtone » Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:35 pm

I run an Apogee Rosetta 800 with the Firewire 400 card and use 7ms of latency at 88.2kHz sampling rate. 651 samples to be exact (so ok... 7.38ms).

Roy
www.rarefiedrecording.com
"No matter how corrupt, greedy, and heartless our government, our corporations, our media,
and our religious and charitable institutions may become, the music will still be wonderful." -Kurt Vonnegut

User avatar
justinf
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:31 pm
Location: charlotte

Post by justinf » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:55 am

IMHO there isn't necessarily an "optimal" setting
This is what I'm finding too, that it's better to track at a slightly lower latency (for less annoyance) and when listening is critical go a little higher (minimal artifacts). For my system 7ms and 13ms seems to do the trick--a small difference, yet significant.

Interesting that I'm not the only one who has come to this conclusion. thanks-

percussion boy
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1512
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:51 pm
Location: Bay Area

Post by percussion boy » Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:04 pm

I've been getting down to 4 ms with the Firepod at 24/48.

I guess I'm luckier than I thought.
"The world don't need no more songs." - Bob Dylan

"Why does the Creator send me such knuckleheads?" - Sun Ra
.
.
.
.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests