the Absolute reason NOT to master yourself
So, it appears that pretty much everyone who has posted on this thread so far has more knowledge of the subject than jeff, who's intent it seems was to 'edumacate' us. Great.
What's he got against 'kids in basements' anyway? I bet many of them have converters that are better than behringers.......
What's he got against 'kids in basements' anyway? I bet many of them have converters that are better than behringers.......
"If you will starve unless you become a rock star, then you have bigger problems than whether or not you are a rock star. " - Steve Albini
YES!!!! ....JASIII wrote:What's he got against 'kids in basements' anyway? I bet many of them have converters that are better than behringers.......
Real friends stab you in the front.
Oscar Wilde
Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York
Oscar Wilde
Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
- ;ivlunsdystf
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
- Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
- Contact:
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
-
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:52 am
- Location: Washington, DC
Re: the Absolute reason NOT to master yourself
For less than $500, Sonic Solutions PMCD lets you put DDP and your audio data onto a CD-R or DVD-R. http://store.sonicstudio.com/@?,*???&? wrote:No kid in his basement with mastering software is going to be able to do that.
Guaranteed.
Also, modern burners actually do have the capability to burn with essentially no reconstructed errors.
Todd Wilcox
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
- @?,*???&?
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5804
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
- Location: Just left on the FM dial
- Contact:
Nope. There is. That's why you should use DDP. Did a mastering guy just say different?MoreSpaceEcho wrote:????????????
i don't think there's really any sound quality issues between a CDR and DDP. someone please correct me if i'm wrong.
my whole system is clocked off a lavry blue, so therefore i am a professional. you should have me master your records for you. i'll give you the friend rate.
mp3s sound just like .wav files too...
- Young Winston
- ass engineer
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:23 pm
- Location: Room 101
- Cellotron
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, New York
- Contact:
Yes - this mastering guy just did (given in both cases of replication from either CD-R master or DDP image that proper procedures and due diligence are taken in the master creation, glass mastering & pressing). I'm basing my statement with first hand experience working at a CD replication plant (Europadisk) for 6 years which had both in-house glass mastering facility and an audio premastering studio under a single roof.@?,*ƒƒƒ&™ wrote:Nope. There is. That's why you should use DDP. Did a mastering guy just say different?MoreSpaceEcho wrote:????????????
i don't think there's really any sound quality issues between a CDR and DDP. someone please correct me if i'm wrong.
The fact is that any decent plant these days receiving a CD-R master uses pre-testing of all masters to insure that it is within Book specs prior to using it for glass mastering, and does load in to an intermediate data store (i.e. a hard drive) via "secure" Digital Audio Extraction which corrects errors on read in prior to the data stream being reclocked and then sent to the LBR.
Of course I'm sure there's some budget plants out there that do a lousy job of glass mastering from CD-R masters - but these will likely screw up the pressing from a DDP image as well!
Again - I'm not saying that DDP doesn't offer a good delivery option for allowing FTP delivery and for giving a greater assurance that there will not be rejection of the delivered master at the plant level - but to believe that it gives "better sound" than the same project replicated in the same way from an in-spec CD-R master has no real basis in fact.
Best regards,
Steve Berson
- @?,*???&?
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5804
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
- Location: Just left on the FM dial
- Contact:
This is interesting to know. How would a manufacturing plant check errors on a disc if there was only one reference? If the master source were say, Sonic Solutions and the master material were actually on a hard drive back at the mastering facility, how would a manufacturing facility be able to discern without comparing to the original material prior to burning?Cellotron wrote:The fact is that any decent plant these days receiving a CD-R master uses pre-testing of all masters to insure that it is within Book specs prior to using it for glass mastering, and does load in to an intermediate data store (i.e. a hard drive) via "secure" Digital Audio Extraction which corrects errors on read in prior to the data stream being reclocked and then sent to the LBR.@?,*???&? wrote:Nope. There is. That's why you should use DDP. Did a mastering guy just say different?MoreSpaceEcho wrote:????????????
i don't think there's really any sound quality issues between a CDR and DDP. someone please correct me if i'm wrong.
Seems auspicious to me. Sort of explains how a CD ref direct from a mastering facility with DDP can sound superior to a manufactured disc.
Scarey to think something error corrects upon extraction. Does not DDP make this kind of extraction of audio a thing of the past?
Does a DDP disc yield less errors? Most assuredly. That's what the 'packet-concept' is all about.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 54 guests