How could I possibly disagree with that? You have typed into your interweb terminal a truthful proposition, dear sir.MoreSpaceEcho wrote:weeeeellllllllllll, i think that's good advice if you're new to mixing (or if you've made a mess of a mix...just take everything off and start over) but if you know what you're looking for, like for example if you put a basic mix up and it's obvious that there's too much low mid woof on the kick drum, or there's obviously tons of unecessary low end on the guitars, there's no reason not to address that right from the start. you think?
Basic EQ/Compression settings
- ;ivlunsdystf
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
- Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
- Contact:
- Boogdish
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 10:18 pm
- Location: Lampasas, TX
- Contact:
Sorry for starting this with a sarcastic response. I've had an earwax problem the last few days that's kept me from mixing and it's had me pretty frustrated. I agree with whoever said that the best "starting point" is no eq or compression, and that experimentation is the best way to learn this stuff.
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:20 pm
- Location: Twin Cities, MN
- Contact:
The funny thing is that when I first saw yours, I didn't read through more than the first list of settings, and I just thought you really hated low mids.Boogdish wrote:Sorry for starting this with a sarcastic response. I've had an earwax problem the last few days that's kept me from mixing and it's had me pretty frustrated. I agree with whoever said that the best "starting point" is no eq or compression, and that experimentation is the best way to learn this stuff.
- ;ivlunsdystf
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
- Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
- Contact:
You know about Murine drops, right? I just did a go-around with those last week and about 36 hours after I used the drops I literally had a gob of brown wax fall out of my ear, about the size of an average ladybird beetle.Boogdish wrote:Sorry for starting this with a sarcastic response. I've had an earwax problem the last few days that's kept me from mixing and it's had me pretty frustrated. I agree with whoever said that the best "starting point" is no eq or compression, and that experimentation is the best way to learn this stuff.
- Boogdish
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 10:18 pm
- Location: Lampasas, TX
- Contact:
I googled Murine and it looks like another carbamide peroxide based drop. I've been using a different brand carbamide peroxide and it hasn't worked too well so far. I've been getting advice on it from a few folks though, I have a couple more tricks to try and I've had this happen to me before, but thanks for the advice. Now, back to explaining how we can't explain eq to that guy.Tatertot wrote:You know about Murine drops, right? I just did a go-around with those last week and about 36 hours after I used the drops I literally had a gob of brown wax fall out of my ear, about the size of an average ladybird beetle.Boogdish wrote:Sorry for starting this with a sarcastic response. I've had an earwax problem the last few days that's kept me from mixing and it's had me pretty frustrated. I agree with whoever said that the best "starting point" is no eq or compression, and that experimentation is the best way to learn this stuff.
- NarxistDan
- alignin' 24-trk
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:15 pm
- Location: Portland
HPF
Hi pass filters are kind of a big deal too...try to find the fundamental frequencies of the instruments and roll off everything below. Or I guess if ear training is the topic of conversation:
start by moving the frequency of a fairly steep HPF up until you hear where the actual bottom of the program begins to be affected. See how different slopes affect the sound and how close you can get without losing important frequency content.
Even if you use no other EQ in a mix this will help low end clarity 9 times out of ten.
Also, try to get in the habit of EQing with all the other elements up unless you're doing drastic sound sculpting. EQ in a mix is mostly about fitting things together. How could you possibly know if you're getting closer or further away from that goal when the track's soloed? You might be surprised at what some "well" carved track sounds like soloed.
And try to resist the temptation to rely on plugins with pictures of old gear and just a few knobs. You'll learn more faster with the basics i.e. EQ III, renaissance compressor, than you will with the BF Pultec and LA-2A (although I guess you can dial in the BF76, but really...).
All that said, if it sounds good you did the right thing, learn from it, if it sounds bad, learn from it and try something else.
start by moving the frequency of a fairly steep HPF up until you hear where the actual bottom of the program begins to be affected. See how different slopes affect the sound and how close you can get without losing important frequency content.
Even if you use no other EQ in a mix this will help low end clarity 9 times out of ten.
Also, try to get in the habit of EQing with all the other elements up unless you're doing drastic sound sculpting. EQ in a mix is mostly about fitting things together. How could you possibly know if you're getting closer or further away from that goal when the track's soloed? You might be surprised at what some "well" carved track sounds like soloed.
And try to resist the temptation to rely on plugins with pictures of old gear and just a few knobs. You'll learn more faster with the basics i.e. EQ III, renaissance compressor, than you will with the BF Pultec and LA-2A (although I guess you can dial in the BF76, but really...).
All that said, if it sounds good you did the right thing, learn from it, if it sounds bad, learn from it and try something else.
Rehearse More
Edit Less
Edit Less
- ;ivlunsdystf
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
- Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
- Contact:
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6691
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
Re: HPF
awesome.DanTheNarc wrote:Rehearse More
Edit Less
- The Real MC
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:50 am
- Location: Tranquil secluded country
- Contact:
Re: Basic EQ/Compression settings
Totally agree. Those settings worked great when I recorded a cover of John Cage's 4:33Boogdish wrote:For electric guitar:
-14db @ 382hz
+2db @ 904hz
+1.7 @ 1838hz
-6.8db @ 12321hz
For Piano:
-14db @ 382hz
+2db @ 904hz
+1.7 @ 1838hz
-6.8db @ 12321hz
For Bass:
-14db @ 382hz
+2db @ 904hz
+1.7 @ 1838hz
-6.8db @ 12321hz
I'll type up some more later, but these have always worked good for me.
- NarxistDan
- alignin' 24-trk
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:15 pm
- Location: Portland
Re: HPF
word jon
Oh, and EQ is for the weak, I get my mix together by pumping individual elements through carefully selected and placed speakers in a good sounding room through a binaural mic to a modified 2" 2 track Studer. All the real pro's mix like that.
Oh, and EQ is for the weak, I get my mix together by pumping individual elements through carefully selected and placed speakers in a good sounding room through a binaural mic to a modified 2" 2 track Studer. All the real pro's mix like that.
Rehearse More
Edit Less
Edit Less
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6691
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 180 guests