What was your first DAW?
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:32 pm
- Location: Bodymore, Murdaland
- kingmetal
- buyin' gear
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:10 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
Cakewalk, but the hell if I know what version it was (10 or 11 years ago at this point). I bet I could still remember what the box looked like. My dad, who I swear is psychic with gear purchases sometimes, bought it for no reason 3 years before. Used an Audigy with a breakout box that had a mic pre with a 1/4" input. I think I had a 1/4" to XLR cable that we hooked a 57 up to.
Even at a young age, I discovered I hated Cakewalk. I had been big into software piracy since I was about 13 so I think I swapped up to Nuendo pretty quick. Ah the good ol' days when all my software was free!
Even at a young age, I discovered I hated Cakewalk. I had been big into software piracy since I was about 13 so I think I swapped up to Nuendo pretty quick. Ah the good ol' days when all my software was free!
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:39 am
- Location: Louisville
- Contact:
I know it was a hardware something, probably a Boss (early BR-something) or Fostex 8 track. All I cared about then was built-in delay effects. I went through a few different machines like that through the last several years before settling down recently with Logic. I feel like I finally made it home.
Why not?
-Hunter S. Thompson
-Hunter S. Thompson
-
- TapeOp Admin
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 11:50 am
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
I had to actually do research to find the name of this device: Fostex D2424. It was intended (by me) as a gap between going from tape to Pro Tools. This was pre PT LE! The thing was such a pain to learn that I wouldn't touch it, but my intern did some stuff with it. We thought it was pretty amazing to spend that much on something that was 10x worse sounding than tape AND hard to use. The we got a Digi 001 and it sat in a box for almost a year. When people would ask if we had Pro Tools, I'd say, "Sure. It's in that box out front."
Now I think most of our sessions are PT HD. Things change. It sure is nice to fire up the tape decks for some sessions though...
Now I think most of our sessions are PT HD. Things change. It sure is nice to fire up the tape decks for some sessions though...
Larry Crane, Editor/Founder Tape Op Magazine
please visit www.tapeop.com for contact information
(do not send private messages via this board!)
www.larry-crane.com
please visit www.tapeop.com for contact information
(do not send private messages via this board!)
www.larry-crane.com
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:52 pm
- DrummerMan
- george martin
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:18 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Roland VS-880 I borrowed from a friend who bought it to record one album then lost all interest in the recording process after finishing said album. Definitely had it's limitations, but I made a bunch of fun recordings on it in my bedroom, certainly the type of thing that, amazingly enough, inspired me to turn it on and just start doing.
First desktop computer based DAW was DP3 running on os9.
First desktop computer based DAW was DP3 running on os9.
- tdbajus
- suffering 'studio suck'
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:56 pm
- Location: brooklyn
- Contact:
Digidesign's Session8, somewhere around 1995/1996. I had just gotten done editing an ice skater's dance routine on 1/4, rolling tape back and forth, trying to figure out where exactly the cello started.
S8, btw, was still a better audio editor than Logic, which what I use now. Wish they made Vegas for Mac....
S8, btw, was still a better audio editor than Logic, which what I use now. Wish they made Vegas for Mac....
___________________________________
I hear you singing in the wire.
http://www.bathyspheremusic.com
www.bathyspheremusic.com
I hear you singing in the wire.
http://www.bathyspheremusic.com
www.bathyspheremusic.com
Power Tracks Pro Audio around '95, which i later augmented with Cool Edit 96 for off-line destructive edits.
ran on a 486DX33 with 8MB and a (back then) hideously expensive 420MB hard drive and an ISA Sound Blaster 16 card.
...but i mostly used borrowed 4-track and 8-track machines at the time cos the computer took forever and my Porta Two had taken the dirt nap by '94.
ran on a 486DX33 with 8MB and a (back then) hideously expensive 420MB hard drive and an ISA Sound Blaster 16 card.
...but i mostly used borrowed 4-track and 8-track machines at the time cos the computer took forever and my Porta Two had taken the dirt nap by '94.
?What need is there to weep over parts of life? The whole of it calls for tears.? -- Seneca
I've got one of those now. I don't consider it a DAW, though. Doesn't have much Workstation to it. I guess it's got some editing capabilities, but I consider it a digital capture device, without all the tapes laying around. I've never had any reason to complain about the sound, but I haven't got a lot to compare it to.TapeOpLarry wrote:I had to actually do research to find the name of this device: Fostex D2424.
Lemme see, my wife split in '99 and so the next day I went and bought a Boss BR8, what recorded to a Zip disc.
Used that for a year until I realized that the Cool Edit program my buddy had bought in like '95 was better to edit stuff.
Paid for the upgrades and various soundcards (OEM then alll M-Audio) and today I still use CEP2.1, and a Delta 44, augmented with a Zoom H2 to capture my drummer. (Recordings linked below.)
Used that for a year until I realized that the Cool Edit program my buddy had bought in like '95 was better to edit stuff.
Paid for the upgrades and various soundcards (OEM then alll M-Audio) and today I still use CEP2.1, and a Delta 44, augmented with a Zoom H2 to capture my drummer. (Recordings linked below.)
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 9:15 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests