In the 60's & early 70's singers would sing into 2 mics.
In the 60's & early 70's singers would sing into 2 mics.
In the 60's & early 70's singers would sing into 2 mics. They would be taped together. Was this for recording puposes or monitor purposes. Or something completely different?
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
One mic for the PA, one for the film/recording rig.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
- woodhenge
- pushin' record
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:28 am
- Location: Hangin' with Jake and Elwood @Bob's Country Bunker, Indiana
Sometimes, in broadcast, they'll have one as a backup in case one freaks out, too. Most of the crappy award shows do this with 2 on a podium. Or the President, I guess. Or a dual lav setup for newscasters, etc. Of course, nobody would ever want any of these jokers to actually sing...
insert witty comment here...
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
It makes perfect sense. It's like the trick where you put a mic in the null of two out of phase speakers so the singer can sing without headphones. If you have two 57's taped together with one out of phase it will cancel out some the bleed from the monitors so you can get more gain. Not saying I would ever do it myself. . .subatomic pieces wrote:this doesn't make sense at all.mwerden wrote:Can't remember my source, but I believe they used to flip the phase on one mic effectively canceling any sound that wasn't directly in front of 1 of the two capsules.
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
You sing into one of them, not both. I'm sure a little bit gets into the other mic, but not so much that it doesn't work.subatomic pieces wrote:If you have two 57s taped together and out of phase with each other, what happens to the sound of your voice when you talk into them? How does the voice NOT cancel?
This is getting a long way from the topic, like whole galaxies away...mwerden wrote:You sing into one of them, not both. I'm sure a little bit gets into the other mic, but not so much that it doesn't work.
Phase cancellation needs two signals of equal amplitude to fully cancel. If there was any truth in your idea, using one mic and flipping the monitor phase would be the easy answer. Also, I defy you to tape two 57s together and then somehow sing into just one of them.
Care to explain that again ?mwerden wrote: If you have two 57's taped together with one out of phase it will cancel out some the bleed from the monitors so you can get more gain
- woodhenge
- pushin' record
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:28 am
- Location: Hangin' with Jake and Elwood @Bob's Country Bunker, Indiana
Actually, I remember reading an interview with Bob Heil about this very subject, and he would flip the phase of the vocal monitors to eliminate feedback at high volume, not 2 mics with one flipped out-of-phase. Was that in Tape Op maybe? Or that crappy EQ mag? It's been a while, but I remember the article well.stuntbutt wrote:The Grateful Dead used to employ the two mics out of phase deal with their Wall Of Sound. It was the only way they could have the vocal mics in front of the all those speakers.
insert witty comment here...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests