Modifying DBX 163X

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
doc sherm sticks
audio school
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:18 pm

Post by doc sherm sticks » Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:33 pm

i plugged it in last night. def a trim switch. bummer...i was hopin it would be like a variable attack/release or be a switch to different components...oh well the 163x is still a beast!

Beneficial
pushin' record
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:38 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Beneficial » Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:46 am

Does anyone know which trim pots control THD? ... more specifically on the dbx 163. I believe it may be R9 and R10. Can anyone confirm? I was thinking of trying to mod this to use as a variable distortion box.

Beneficial
pushin' record
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:38 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Beneficial » Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:50 am

Does anyone know which trim pots control THD? ... more specifically on the dbx 163. I believe it may be R9 and R10. Can anyone confirm? I was thinking of trying to mod this to use as a variable distortion box.

Beneficial
pushin' record
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:38 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Beneficial » Tue Dec 21, 2010 7:13 pm

Here's the inside of my DBX 163. I'm wondering what all of these trim pots do. I know one of them adjusts third harmonic distortion (Jim Williams modded some of these for me in the past and told me that). Does anyone know which trim pot does that, or what the others do?

Looks like there are seven trim pots all together... five horizontal marked 50k, one marked 100, and then one bigger verticle one marked 50k. Is the blue stuff just wax that you can heat before you tweak the trim pot?


Image[/img]

germaniac
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:02 pm

Post by germaniac » Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:54 pm

That's a very different implementation than the 163X, which is what I have, and what most everyone on this thread has. I can't tell you what trimmer is what, but this will:

http://www.dbxpro.com/product_downloads ... ematic.pdf

As far as rigging it to do distortion, I have a hunch mis-adjusting the THD trimmer will only get you asymmetrical clipping. For something closer to symmetrical clipping or full-on distortion, I think you would want to decrease the series resistance at the input of the VCA. But I'm just hypothesizng here, never actually tried it. . . .

Joe

Beneficial
pushin' record
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:38 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Beneficial » Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:40 am

Interesting, I was thinking I could use them to add subtle third harmonics. I sent Jim an email, I've hired him to mod a bunch of stuff and he's an expert on these... hoping he gets back to me. It would be awesome if some of the other trim pots controlled attack/release etc, but I'm guessing that's not the case.

User avatar
Brian
resurrected
Posts: 2254
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: corner of your eye
Contact:

Post by Brian » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:13 am

i don't think my 163's board looks like that, but, it's been a year since I opened it. Good luck with the mods, you have the right guy on the job, as you already know.
Harumph!

Beneficial
pushin' record
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:38 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Beneficial » Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:41 am

I wonder if these 163's were made differently at different times. If someone has any ideas as to what these pots might do (or can make sense of the schematics posted above) please let me know. I'm tempted to start messing with them but don't want to throw it completely out of wack without knowing what they do.

germaniac
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:02 pm

Post by germaniac » Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:12 am

Not sure if the 163 had variations/revisions, but it's very different from the 163X. The older 163 circuitry is closer to a discrete implementation, the in/out connectors are RCA, and the case has wood sides. The newer 163X uses an intergrated circuit VCA and a later generation integrated RMS detector chip, 1/4'' connectors, and a standard half-rack case made of metal. . . .

Here's the calibration notes for the 163:

http://www.dbxpro.com/product_downloads ... cedure.pdf

It says the THD adjustment sets the 2nd harmonic distortion, which is (as I said) a product of asymmetrical clipping. 3rd harmonic distortion would be a product of symmetrical clipping, and you would get this most easily by overdriving the input of the VCA. . . .

The other trimmers adjust PS voltage, DC offset, output level, etc. Probably no need to mess with those. . . .

Joe

Beneficial
pushin' record
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:38 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Beneficial » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:31 pm

Thanks for posting that calibration link! I emailed Jim Williams asking about this and he told me not to mess with it. It looks like distortion is adjusted by a combination of three different trim pots. I might get brave enough to start messing around with it. Hopefully I don't throw it too out of wack.

sethl
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:33 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Help me troubleshoot one of these please!

Post by sethl » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:50 pm

I modded a pair of these and was very pleased with the results. Until recently that is.

After a couple of months of use, one day one of the unit's red leds looked dim, and the unit wouldn't pass signal. I opened the thing up and started probing the test points.

Test points 7 + 8, which should show + and - 24V, show 12V and -2.3V respectively. There's not much between them and the power transformer (which appears to be fine, it powers the working unit) except diodes, and they tested okay, in circuit at least.

Farther down the line, test points 9 + 10 show 10.2V and 0V. I swapped out VR2 (voltage regulator?) with the component from the good unit, but no dice. I also decoupled these points from the rest of the unit in case something further down the line was dragging down the power supply, but again no dice.

Anyone have any clues? Troubleshooting is a weak point of mine and frankly, I'm stumped.

P.S. - Tried to include a .jpeg of the schematic but for whatever reason that's proving difficult. Links to schematics are below.

Image

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/ ... c/163X.jpg

http://www.dbxpro.com/product_downloads ... ematic.pdf

Nate Dort
tinnitus
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Post by Nate Dort » Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:31 am

Most likely C29 has failed short, since your unregulated negative rail is sagging so much. If you check it closely, you may be able to see it leaking from the top or bottom. If it were me, I'd replace all the rectifier diodes (CR21 thru CR24) and all the electrolytics in the power supply (C28 thru C33.)

If you need to order parts, I'd swap the diodes for UF4007 instead of the stock 1N4002, and put 680uF 35V caps in place of C28 and C29. I'd also add .1uF C0G/NP0 ceramic bypass caps in parallel with C28, C29, C32, and C33.

sethl
ass engineer
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:33 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by sethl » Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:27 am

Thanks for that, I didn't check the PS electros, other than verifying the solder joints. They're all new and higher capacity than stock, but I suppose there's no reason a new capacitor can't fail just as well as an old one....

Update: C29 (and its bypass) check okay, and swapping in a replacement doesn't cure the problem. I'll replace the diodes, but I'm wondering--and this belies my troubleshooting inexperience:

It seems that the problem starts as soon as AC hits the PS. So it would be my instinct to focus my attention there (though the diodes appear fine).

But is there something down the line (the led board? The "Q1" transistor?) that's "weighing" down the 24V PS?

Or is the simplest answer usually the right one?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests