Hah. I love it. People tend to have strong feelings for or against it though, kind of like the Grateful Dead or Dave Matthews.
GJ
Drum Microphone Shoot-Out (Mono Room)
- Gregg Juke
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
- Contact:
That's Dave "Mumbles" Matthews, to me.
I thought the Teac a little "treble-crunchy", the MXL a little compressed-sounding, almost processed, and use-able by itself.
For mix OH's, I liked the ribbons the best and the Fathead the best of them, but then I use a MXL 144, also about 10' out but at 5' because our ceilings are about 6'6" (dropping to 6" for the duct work, all walboarded . )
I thought the Teac a little "treble-crunchy", the MXL a little compressed-sounding, almost processed, and use-able by itself.
For mix OH's, I liked the ribbons the best and the Fathead the best of them, but then I use a MXL 144, also about 10' out but at 5' because our ceilings are about 6'6" (dropping to 6" for the duct work, all walboarded . )
I like the MXL and the Fathead. I want chunk out of my room mics not cymbals... It's smoother and easier on the ears to me. The bleed from the tom mics in a multi mic situation will give you enough brittle highs to have to deal with. Not really feeling the Teac. It could work in context but never have I thought to myself "If only the drums could sound thinner.."
- Gregg Juke
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
- Contact:
I believe it. In context is what matters obviously. I am into big dark roomy post rock, post hardcore type of things so I lean toward the darker heavier room sound and like to supplement them with close mics for snap and punch. But I can see how the Teac could add the midrange needed in context of the song. I like these type of threads. You get to use your ears and not your mouth. Thanks for posting!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests