Mastering Rant:I could care less bout your Lavery converters
Mastering Rant:I could care less bout your Lavery converters
I could care less about your Lavery's
Don't try to talk me out of 192.
Labels are requesting 192 for the HD services like HD Tracks and PONO.
Labels are paying for mastering.
Get some new converters!\
General not pointed at anyone specific but about everyone at the same time comment!
Don't try to talk me out of 192.
Labels are requesting 192 for the HD services like HD Tracks and PONO.
Labels are paying for mastering.
Get some new converters!\
General not pointed at anyone specific but about everyone at the same time comment!
Because Lavry AD only goes to 96kHz and some labels have decided in their infinite wisdom to offer 192kHz recordings. Hence the Lavry owners cry about having to replace their lush AD with something else.
That said I'd assume ultimately the quality goes down when they replace those Lavrys with something shittier but with bigger numbers.
That said I'd assume ultimately the quality goes down when they replace those Lavrys with something shittier but with bigger numbers.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
even the bats wouldn't care.
dan makes a pretty good argument for why 192 is silly, at best:
http://www.lavryengineering.com/pdfs/la ... _audio.pdf
haven't ever had anyone send 192 mixes, or ask for masters back at that rate...we'll see what happens in 5 years, but i'm keeping my lavrys for now.
dan makes a pretty good argument for why 192 is silly, at best:
http://www.lavryengineering.com/pdfs/la ... _audio.pdf
haven't ever had anyone send 192 mixes, or ask for masters back at that rate...we'll see what happens in 5 years, but i'm keeping my lavrys for now.
- JohnDavisNYC
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 2:43 pm
- Location: crooklyn, ny
- Contact:
thankfully i haven't had to deal with any 192 mix requests. we did one tracking session at 192 for a japanese label with a freelance engineer.
192 really bums me out. and i'm into striving for higher quality. it just bums me out since it's basically a catchy marketing catch phrase...
IMO a label asking for 192 is like David St.Hubbins' girlfriend asking if it was done in 'Dubly'.
J
192 really bums me out. and i'm into striving for higher quality. it just bums me out since it's basically a catchy marketing catch phrase...
IMO a label asking for 192 is like David St.Hubbins' girlfriend asking if it was done in 'Dubly'.
J
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
- digitaldrummer
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Contact:
- Studiodawg
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:19 am
- Location: USA
Thanks!MoreSpaceEcho wrote:i use a lynx aes-16.vvv wrote:Out of curiosity, looking at the Lavry AD-10, what would you use to interface with a computer?
As a bedio enthusiast - wait, that came out wrong, not that I ain't one ...
As a bedio recordist, that kinda stuff is a bit too expensive for my needs, at the present time, anywhat.
That said, I do wanna know about it, because mebbe someday ...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: MoreSpaceEcho and 31 guests