Question: Amphenol 7 pin connectors on old mic pre. Pls Help
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 1:52 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Test metered the amphenols with the unit powered up. Very, very similar to the LEMO pinout except I think the pin 4/5 duties are different. Definitely glad I metered it as I'm seeing 120v on one of the pins! Not going to hook that one up to any of my mics, needless to say. lol.
Im going to make some test leads to try the potential inputs and see if we get anything back out. Stay tuned and thanks for all the info!
~Dorian
Im going to make some test leads to try the potential inputs and see if we get anything back out. Stay tuned and thanks for all the info!
~Dorian
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 1:52 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
First of all, thanks so much to everyone here who offered advice and helped me get on the right track! This thing is modded and passing signal now.
After bouncing email with Bruel & Kjaer, they confirmed that this was built in their old Ohio division. Sometime in the late 70's or early 80's (Their HQ is in Denmark now). They have no further info on the unit, other than that it was likely for wide frequency range measurement microphones that use polarization voltage.
After metering voltage, impedance, and potential ground faults between chassis and every pin combo on the Amphenol inputs, I eventually isolated what I hoped would be the microphone signal input and ground. Success!
Leap of faith: modified the chassis for XLR in and 1/4" out. Safetied off the power supply feeds that went to the original mic connections. Currently running unbalanced (if anyone has a better idea, please tell) as due to the mysterious pinout readings on my meter, I couldn't verify a negative input.
4 out of 6 channels pass clean, crisp signal, testing with a cardioid vocal mic.
Racking it up in the studio this Monday to compare it to our other preamps! (Neve 1272 clones, Chandler, etc).
Thanks again and stay tuned.
~Dorian
After bouncing email with Bruel & Kjaer, they confirmed that this was built in their old Ohio division. Sometime in the late 70's or early 80's (Their HQ is in Denmark now). They have no further info on the unit, other than that it was likely for wide frequency range measurement microphones that use polarization voltage.
After metering voltage, impedance, and potential ground faults between chassis and every pin combo on the Amphenol inputs, I eventually isolated what I hoped would be the microphone signal input and ground. Success!
Leap of faith: modified the chassis for XLR in and 1/4" out. Safetied off the power supply feeds that went to the original mic connections. Currently running unbalanced (if anyone has a better idea, please tell) as due to the mysterious pinout readings on my meter, I couldn't verify a negative input.
4 out of 6 channels pass clean, crisp signal, testing with a cardioid vocal mic.
Racking it up in the studio this Monday to compare it to our other preamps! (Neve 1272 clones, Chandler, etc).
Thanks again and stay tuned.
~Dorian
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 1:52 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 1:52 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 1:52 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Hi All! ~ Update
Pardon the slow update- right as we got these mystery Bruel & Kjaer pre's in working order we also opted to reconfigure our space for a Rupert Neve Designs 5059 summing mixer. This past week has been a gauntlet of soldering work to convert our Mogami snakes to the required connections on either end. Testing all signal paths later today!
So- The Bruel & Kjaer is a very interesting beast! I haven't put it on any scope or analyzer since the conversion, but have been trying it with different tracking duties. First favorite: toms. Vocals and guitars seemed a bit too bright and harsh in the 3-6k range, but worked very well for a dark drum set, as well as bass. The low mids and stick attack for toms were naturally accented as most would want for rock.
I want to run some pink noise in to get a better idea of what the circuit is really doing. These pre's seem useful and unique. They can be pushed on the input side for some nice crunch & energy.
Still running unbalanced on the outputs, due to my lack of expertise, but they push a pretty hot, clean signal overall.
Ideas or advice? You all have been so helpful Thanks.
~Dorian
So- The Bruel & Kjaer is a very interesting beast! I haven't put it on any scope or analyzer since the conversion, but have been trying it with different tracking duties. First favorite: toms. Vocals and guitars seemed a bit too bright and harsh in the 3-6k range, but worked very well for a dark drum set, as well as bass. The low mids and stick attack for toms were naturally accented as most would want for rock.
I want to run some pink noise in to get a better idea of what the circuit is really doing. These pre's seem useful and unique. They can be pushed on the input side for some nice crunch & energy.
Still running unbalanced on the outputs, due to my lack of expertise, but they push a pretty hot, clean signal overall.
Ideas or advice? You all have been so helpful Thanks.
~Dorian
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 170 guests