Sennheiser 421 vs AKG d112 (live application)

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
User avatar
Ryan Silva
tinnitus
Posts: 1229
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:46 pm
Location: San Francisco

Sennheiser 421 vs AKG d112 (live application)

Post by Ryan Silva » Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:00 am

Down with the egg I say, I love all my AKG mics but I can's stand the d112 on kick drum. It has no life what so ever, it may have a touch more on the bottom end but who cares when it sounds like a cardboard box.
You know I think I could do an entire show with nothing but 421s.

Any takers?
"Writing good songs is hard. recording is easy. "

MoreSpaceEcho

User avatar
trodden
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5710
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 8:21 am
Location: C-attle
Contact:

Post by trodden » Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:02 am

Give me your d112 and a dollar.

Harry
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:06 am
Location: South Bend, Indiana

Post by Harry » Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:06 am

I was watching the concert for Bangladesh the other day and I'm pretty sure every mic on the stage was a 421

mixbob
audio school
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 5:48 am
Location: Waterbury, CT

Re: Sennheiser 421 vs AKG d112 (live application)

Post by mixbob » Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:30 am

Last year my D112 quit working after about 17 years of use.
So while it was out for repair, I purchased a Sennheiser E602.

I noticed the E602 sounded good in most kick drums with little eq. and was a little more forgiving as far as placement.

When my D112 returned from repair with a new capsule, I was pleasently reminded of why I bought it 17 years ago. It sounded great ; good definition for it's entire bandwidth and it handled level very well.

I think over time all dynamic mics will degrade after continuous kick drum duty.
I have noticed this with my D112 and an EV RE20. After years of use, the high end starts to go away.

I think the MD421 sounds great almost any where you put it. I love it on toms, amps, horns, leslie lows and on vocals. ( I have seen it used on Dave Letterman's desk)
It's size and shape may be the only detractors due to difficulty in making it fit where you want.
Bob J

junkstar
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: new york
Contact:

Post by junkstar » Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:36 am

MD421 -- It's size and shape may be the only detractors due to difficulty in making it fit where you want.
Nah, it the lousy clip design that is it's main 'detractor' -- what a f'n drag that system is. All plastic threads, a slide-in clip that barely locks, ugh.

User avatar
MikeCzech
gettin' sounds
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:28 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, UT

Post by MikeCzech » Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:18 pm

If the PA has subs and you want to put the kick through everyone's chest, go for the D112. If you wanna slap 'em in the face with it use the 421.

User avatar
jmoose
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Normal, IL USA
Contact:

Post by jmoose » Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:27 pm

D112's have a whacky pattern...real loose and they tend to grab a lot of hi-hat and other hash. I dig the Beta 52 for FOH work, that generally lets the tone of the kick come though and takes EQ pretty well. The Sennheiser is great but it tends to make every kick drum sound the same, that "big rwak" sound.
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
mixer|producer|audio engineer
www.mooseaudio.net

www.oxidelounge.com

trumpetgunk
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:41 am
Location: New York City

Post by trumpetgunk » Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:51 am

junkstar wrote: Nah, it the lousy clip design that is it's main 'detractor' -- what a f'n drag that system is. All plastic threads, a slide-in clip that barely locks, ugh.
That's the truth! It's almost mandatory to carry around a roll gaff tape with the microphone to make sure it doesn't fall off its clip in the middle of the gig!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 141 guests