Beringer Thread
- Girl Toes
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1598
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 2:06 pm
- Location: In A Turkey Sandwich
- Contact:
Beringer Thread
So, i'll be at some show in a small bar a lot and be asked to help with sound a bit. More often than not, they have a b'ger mixer. I wanted to say that the lack of solo buttons really annoy me, and its very hard to tell whats what with out playing with the faders. However, i think they sound kind of awesome. I like them much better than the old mackies. They go real well with Dean Markley guitar pickups.
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 7:58 am
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
- Kyle Motor
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 12:55 pm
- Location: Madison WI
- Contact:
I'm a bit torn on the Behringer thing. I have an old Behringer mixer that got me through a few years of tracking to a Tascam 238. The thing barely works anymore, random stuff just started quitting on it. And now I'm working with an MX5050 and an Allen & Heath board, so I figure "I'm past that".
But I find myself yearning for the pres on that old behringer......crazy, I know. But with a 57 on an overdriven guitar amp I got some great sounds out of those pres......the key being to crank all three bands of EQ along with the pre going to tape. Big full guitar tracks with enough sparkle.
I've been fighting the temptation to bust that old board out again just to try it for that on my current setup. My worry is that it'll tonally clash too much with my current setup as opposed to the somewhat lo-fi 238. I guess there's only one way to find out......
But I find myself yearning for the pres on that old behringer......crazy, I know. But with a 57 on an overdriven guitar amp I got some great sounds out of those pres......the key being to crank all three bands of EQ along with the pre going to tape. Big full guitar tracks with enough sparkle.
I've been fighting the temptation to bust that old board out again just to try it for that on my current setup. My worry is that it'll tonally clash too much with my current setup as opposed to the somewhat lo-fi 238. I guess there's only one way to find out......
-
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:22 am
- Location: Ramah, New Mexico
I actually like the T1953 loaded with Tesla/JJ ECC83S's or NOS 12AU7's (RCA's and Sylvania's especially). It's totally useful for acoustic guitar and some other string instruments (celtic harp, etc.). It's not bad for using on small-watt guitar amps. I love the high pass filter on that one.
The UB Pro series mixers can be really quiet and transparent with the EQ turned off and they actually have a lot of headroom IMO. You just have to tweak them alot and you'll get what you need out of them. They're actually not that bad for bass DI in a pinch.
The UB Pro series mixers can be really quiet and transparent with the EQ turned off and they actually have a lot of headroom IMO. You just have to tweak them alot and you'll get what you need out of them. They're actually not that bad for bass DI in a pinch.
it's interesting how often behringer comes up as a topic for debate. their products are such a mixed bag that there's kinda like this love/hate thing going on with them among people who are into recording. true, most of the people who really like their stuff are amatures like myself (although i wouldn't say i really like their products on the whole).
behringer makes stuff that's good for right now, if you can't afford anything nice but you need something. in kyle motor's post earlier in the thread, it was phrased like "i used a mixer that got me through recording on a 238 (or whatever)." that's exactly it, it's not investment gear. it gets you through until you can afford something good. my gibson 335 on the other hand, that was something i bought and knew i'd have it probably forever.
behringer makes stuff that's good for right now, if you can't afford anything nice but you need something. in kyle motor's post earlier in the thread, it was phrased like "i used a mixer that got me through recording on a 238 (or whatever)." that's exactly it, it's not investment gear. it gets you through until you can afford something good. my gibson 335 on the other hand, that was something i bought and knew i'd have it probably forever.
- I'm Painting Again
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:15 am
- Location: New York, New York
- Contact:
- inverseroom
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5031
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 8:37 am
- Location: Ithaca, NY
- Contact:
inverseroom wrote:Behringer thread sucks, guys. Get the Neumann three-ply ploly/cotton blend. It costs more but it's worth it. I once fixed my windbreaker with Behringer thread, and it was ripped to shreds in like 30 minutes.
I totally bought a denoiser after seeing you talk it up and that damned thing rocks! i use 1/2" 8 tr and it's a dream for NR.
"If you will starve unless you become a rock star, then you have bigger problems than whether or not you are a rock star. " - Steve Albini
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 2:50 pm
- Location: Laveen, AZ
- Contact:
Wooah, Tape Op, you used to be cool, man. Now it's all behringer this, behringer that.
I feel that their unethical business practices are enough reason to avoid Behringer. I played with a Line 6 rip-off amp once (now that's the pot calling the kettle black or something) - it was full of features, like it had a line input and stuff, but sounded like crap.
b
I feel that their unethical business practices are enough reason to avoid Behringer. I played with a Line 6 rip-off amp once (now that's the pot calling the kettle black or something) - it was full of features, like it had a line input and stuff, but sounded like crap.
b
- AnalogElectric
- suffering 'studio suck'
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 12:36 pm
- Location: Gilbert, Arizona
- Contact:
I'd take this message board over the HomeRecording BBS anyday.Brian Brock wrote:Wooah, Tape Op, you used to be cool, man. Now it's all behringer this, behringer that.
I feel that their unethical business practices are enough reason to avoid Behringer. I played with a Line 6 rip-off amp once (now that's the pot calling the kettle black or something) - it was full of features, like it had a line input and stuff, but sounded like crap.
b
As far a Behinger stuff I've used I've been satisfied with direct mic pre's from their small mixers (not much better than Mackie). Their comps/lims are better than an Alesis 3630 but just marginally.
Personally I find the Behinger stuff to be pretty harsh. For me it's been a good 3 or more years since I've tried a Behringer item so I can't really say if they're better than they used to be. It's kinda what I used to think about PreSounus stuff, it's not until I actually work with some of their newer lines before I can give a proper perspective... but with the newer PreSonus stuff I've been very happy and surprised with the results.
-- Adam Lazlo
AnalogElectric Recording
Gilbert, Arizona USA
http://www.analogelectric.com
http://www.myspace.com/adamlazlo
Gilbert, Arizona USA
http://www.analogelectric.com
http://www.myspace.com/adamlazlo
- joelpatterson
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1732
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 5:20 pm
- Location: Albany, New York
- inverseroom
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5031
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 8:37 am
- Location: Ithaca, NY
- Contact:
Ha! That's right, Behringer as angst source!joelpatterson wrote:Don't tell me those 30 minutes weren't inspired and that someday their siren song of nostalgia will drive you mad with longing? Or at least you'll think, hey, for the money those 30 minutes were great!inverseroom wrote: and it was ripped to shreds in like 30 minutes.
Glad you dig the Denoiser, JAS! Rodgre told me to get it like two years ago, so thank him.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 370 guests