How do YOU record acoustic guitar with vocals?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

User avatar
BradG
pushin' record
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:00 pm
Location: New York City

How do YOU record acoustic guitar with vocals?

Post by BradG » Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:55 am

When you want to record the acoustic guitar, with the player's vocals, at the same time.

I haven't had to do this one in a while and now, after one such session, I'm remembering that I've never been totally satisfied with the results.

I've tried a vertical x/y and variations on that, as well as very close miking of both (usually dynamics, or a mixed pair). The latter always sounds the worst.

I think my favorite is just to set my 87 in omni (or cardioid maybe) and move it around until the balance is good. That usually sounds the best but, of course, leaves me with a totally mono recording.

User avatar
trashy
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2128
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 10:30 am
Location: Red Bluff, CA
Contact:

Re: How do YOU record acoustic guitar with vocals?

Post by trashy » Fri Feb 17, 2006 7:14 am

BradG wrote:leaves me with a totally mono recording.
you say that like it's a bad thing.

spankenstein
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 639
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:58 pm

Post by spankenstein » Fri Feb 17, 2006 7:18 am

I've gotten good results with x/y and a single mike that I've moved around. Usually I'll add a stereo pair back quite a ways to add some room.

kayagum
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN

Post by kayagum » Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:16 am

If you have a pair of figure 8 mikes, you can do a Blumlein-like setup. For the vocal mic, point the null at the guitar soundhole. For the guitar mic, point the null at the mouth.

User avatar
Russian Recording
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 752
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 2:28 pm
Location: Bloomington, IN
Contact:

Post by Russian Recording » Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:27 am

Ive done lots of stuff, and have been pretty happy with all results.

It greatly depends on the singing style and playing style. The toughest is a singer that belts but plays the guitar very light, or even finger picked. Fig 8 and hypercard mics can work really well if positioned properly to reject the vox from the gtr mics and visa versa. It can get boomy if you get too close though.

I recently recorded this guy with a very simple setup and it came out really awesome.

LOMO 19A-13 (card) > Hamptone Tube > Distressor (3:1)
about 3 ft away, facing dudes mouth to pick up voice and guitar.

M/S pair for room mics, on the floor in my live room:
Eathworks TC-30K as MID, AT4050 in fig 8 as SIDE > Syteks > Electrical Audi MS Decoder

That was it, and I think it turned out pretty good. Th LOMO is about 90% of the mix. Here is an mp3:

Morrow: Permanence

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7485
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:14 am

I often use an XY pair on the guitar and a fugure 8 on the vocal. I'm more concerned about the vocal being isolated than the guitar. I usually add a stereo room pair as well.

Eric Rottmayer
pushin' record
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: Headphones, OH

Post by Eric Rottmayer » Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:36 am

i've done this so many different times and for me it depends on the
situation, guitar, type of song, room, etc. but what i've been doing lately
is the SM7 really close & comped for vocals and a omni (rode K2 tube) for
the acoustic about 2 or 3 feet away (moving it around to find the best spot, like you said).

but i kinda like doing the mono too, same just without the SM7.

sometimes i'll do a take each way and just pick the best one.

User avatar
BradG
pushin' record
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:00 pm
Location: New York City

Post by BradG » Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:43 am

drumsound wrote:I often use an XY pair on the guitar and a fugure 8 on the vocal. I'm more concerned about the vocal being isolated than the guitar. I usually add a stereo room pair as well.
Hmmm. That's one I haven't tried yet. I'm gonna give that a shot on this upcoming recording. Do you group all three mic's tightly to try and get the fig 8 mic on the same "plane" as the x/y's?

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:45 am

simply build a horizontally-aligned gobo at chest level between the singer's head and the guitar. Mic each separately. This method provides excellent isolation, though you will need to work quickly as the blood loss from bisecting the performer's body will cause loss of consciousness, but a good performer will be able to overcome this and nail the tune in two takes or less. Any singer not able to do this, you don't want to work with anyway. You'd probably have to autotune them too, and who wants that?
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

User avatar
trashy
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2128
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 10:30 am
Location: Red Bluff, CA
Contact:

Post by trashy » Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:37 am

drumsound wrote:I often use an XY pair on the guitar and a fugure 8 on the vocal. I'm more concerned about the vocal being isolated than the guitar. I usually add a stereo room pair as well.
this sounds like a phase nightmare.

MoreSpaceEcho
zen recordist
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am

Post by MoreSpaceEcho » Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:16 pm

it does? why for? seems reasonable to me.

last time i did this i used two earthworks tc30s, spaced pair, on the guitar, and two ksm 141s in omni on the floor back a ways. this guy was the loud singer/quiet guitar player type, so i also used an m160 and...something else up close on the guitar. but those two did end up making for all sorts of phase weirdness..it wasn't obviously "phasey" it just didn't end up sounding good. so we just went with the omnis, his voice does overpower the guitar now and again but i gotta say the sound of his voice through the earthworks actually sounds better than any time i've recorded his vox "properly". hhhmmm...

knobtwirler
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:18 pm
Location: NYC

Post by knobtwirler » Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:26 pm

dwlb wrote:simply build a horizontally-aligned gobo at chest level between the singer's head and the guitar. Mic each separately. This method provides excellent isolation, though you will need to work quickly as the blood loss from bisecting the performer's body will cause loss of consciousness, but a good performer will be able to overcome this and nail the tune in two takes or less. Any singer not able to do this, you don't want to work with anyway. You'd probably have to autotune them too, and who wants that?
Hahaha, I'm picturing some sort of doggie lampshade contraption...

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:37 pm

I usually do a Blumlein thing with the null of each mic pointed at the respective opposing source. I've done a bunch of records this way and have developed a few additional techniques based on what artists have wanted to hear. If the guitar is boomy-sounding with this setup, I might go with a cardioid capsule as the guitar mic. If the guitar isn't loud enough, I'll use an additional guitar mic down near the player's strumming hand and use the hand as a sort of baffle between the mic and the vocal. (I use my line of sight to determine positioning.) Usually, to help out the stereo image (and because I like the way it sounds), I'll use an additional stereo setup as an ambient signal in addition to the close mics. This is usually an X-Y or ORTF pair, often facing away from the source, but occasionally, an MS setup sounds terrific for this. In the mix phase, panning on the close mics can be anywhere, not necessaory mono all the time.

This is what's worked well for me.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

knobtwirler
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:18 pm
Location: NYC

Post by knobtwirler » Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:20 pm

Lately I've been a big fan of the guitar being a mono tight rhythmic element if the song calls for it. This would mean one cardioid mic on the body somewhere and one vocal mic. The Blumlein thing sounds really cool. How different of a sound do you get with that? The biggest problem with recording guitar and vox at the same time seems to be movement during playing and extreme volume changes in vocal parts/guitar playing.

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:55 pm

knobtwirler wrote:The Blumlein thing sounds really cool. How different of a sound do you get with that?
It's pretty predictable. You get more LF boost from proximity effect due to the nature of bidirectional microphones. The "window of opportunity" as far as player movement is concerned is smaller due to the nature of bidirectional microphones. The plus is that you get more rejection, so there's a little more room for making audible balance adjustments with less phase interferrence due to the coincident arrangement.
knobtwirler wrote:The biggest problem with recording guitar and vox at the same time seems to be movement during playing and extreme volume changes in vocal parts/guitar playing.
This doesn't change. It can be problematic in almost any situation where more than one microphone is capturing the same source if that source is A) noticebly dynamic and B) frought with the potential for movement.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests