Beatles track sheet 1967

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:23 am

dwlb wrote:I have that one as well, bought it at the tube stop in London near Abbey Road (they have a little Abbey Road gift shop there). Also very cool, esp. as it doesn't just focus on Beatles.
That's where I got mine. It's a completely AWESOME book. You can probably order it on the Abbey Road website if they still have the cafe's page up there.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

User avatar
tonewoods
buyin' a studio
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:48 pm
Location: Orcas Island, WA
Contact:

Post by tonewoods » Thu Mar 30, 2006 7:42 pm

Thanks for the tip. all....
I just got a copy from Amazon for 4.95 (!)...

Image
"You see, the whole thing about recording is the attempt at verisimilitude--not truth, but the appearance of truth."
Jerry Wexler

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:37 pm

Looks like they ARE enforcing the no graffiti rule now. Man, bummer.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

User avatar
tonewoods
buyin' a studio
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:48 pm
Location: Orcas Island, WA
Contact:

Post by tonewoods » Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:37 pm

Nahhhh....

Image




Image
"You see, the whole thing about recording is the attempt at verisimilitude--not truth, but the appearance of truth."
Jerry Wexler

Mark
tinnitus
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Leicester, Uk
Contact:

Re: Beatles track sheet 1967

Post by Mark » Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:47 am

votemiles wrote:Copped from a picture in the book "Abbey Road":

7 Sept. 1967

Fader 1: (Bass Guitar) D.I.T. (direct inject?)
Fader 2: (Bass Guitar) C12
Fader 3: (Premix)
Fader 4: (Bass Drum) D19 C
Fader 5: (Guitar) U67
Fader 6: (Guitar) U67
Fader 7: (Vocal) U48
Fader 8: (Vocal) U48

Premix 1: (Drums) C38
Premix 2: (Drums) D19http://www.gallifreyone.com/forum/chat.php? C
Premix 3: (Drums) D19 C
Premix 4: (Drums) KM56

Hmm, those D19s are all over Ringo's kit. Never seen a (Sony?) C38 in any of the session pictures either, so that's another surprise. Guess those Ebay prices are gonna skyrocket again, chuckle...
That'd be two "synched" EMI 1" four tracks, right? :?
WWRHS?

User avatar
Fletcher
steve albini likes it
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 7:38 am
Location: M?nchen
Contact:

Post by Fletcher » Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:28 am

You wouldn't need to sync them as you'd be bouncing from one machine to the other. There was no syncronization technology available in 1967 of which I'm aware.

Mark
tinnitus
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Leicester, Uk
Contact:

Post by Mark » Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:33 am

They did it by hand ;)
WWRHS?

User avatar
soundguy
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Post by soundguy » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:17 am

they didnt invent the alternating current motor until 1968.

dave
http://www.glideonfade.com
one hundred percent discrete transistor recording with style and care.

Mark
tinnitus
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Leicester, Uk
Contact:

Post by Mark » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:23 am

Like I said, BY HAND.

I mean, why else would they need eight frigging faders?

For four tracks...

You can do maths, right?
WWRHS?

Mark
tinnitus
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Leicester, Uk
Contact:

Post by Mark » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:28 am

Wait...

This was during the mixdown, right? :?
WWRHS?

Mark
tinnitus
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Leicester, Uk
Contact:

Post by Mark » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:34 am

Ah! I was thinking this had something to do with Sgt Pepper's. That's the only Beatles LP you Yanks ever talk about right?

Anyhoo, I found this
1968 will be remembered as a year of technological change, pioneered largely due to the creative demands of The Beatles Sergeant Pepper album. Acutely aware of the limitations which four track recording imposed, Ken Townsend invented a system whereby two four track machines could be linked together, ADT. The progression from four track to eight track was followed just as quickly by the introduction of 16 track and 24 track, all of which involved the use of EMI consoles which became the backbone of Abbey Road’s multitrack recording, which revolutionised the way records could be made from here on in.
WWRHS?

User avatar
red cross
buyin' gear
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 4:43 am
Location: The Far East

Post by red cross » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:36 am

Nope. It's the session sheet written by the balance engineer after, presumably, setting up the mics for a recording session. It's not the track list on the tape box.

Mark
tinnitus
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Leicester, Uk
Contact:

Post by Mark » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:40 am

Gotcha.

I misremembered the synching two four tracks thing. I'd had images in my head of a couple of lab coated engineers physically slowing down and speeding up the tape.
WWRHS?

User avatar
red cross
buyin' gear
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 4:43 am
Location: The Far East

Post by red cross » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:42 am

Anyhoo, I found this

Quote:
1968 will be remembered as a year of technological change, pioneered largely due to the creative demands of The Beatles Sergeant Pepper album. Acutely aware of the limitations which four track recording imposed, Ken Townsend invented a system whereby two four track machines could be linked together, ADT. The progression from four track to eight track was followed just as quickly by the introduction of 16 track and 24 track, all of which involved the use of EMI consoles which became the backbone of Abbey Road?s multitrack recording, which revolutionised the way records could be made from here on in.
As far as I can remember from reading the Lewisohn "Sessions" book, the only time two 4-tracks were synced for use simultaneously during the Pepper sessions was during the orchestral overdub for "Day In The Life". Everything else was still pretty much reduction mixes from 4-track to 4-track.

User avatar
Derrick
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 8:01 am
Location: MD/DC Metro Area

Post by Derrick » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:47 am

soundguy wrote:they didnt invent the alternating current motor until 1968.

dave
It was around long before '68.
Image Image

Derrick

We have a pool... and a pond. Pond's good for you though.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 137 guests