Hey 4-track Cassette Users!
- I'm Painting Again
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:15 am
- Location: New York, New York
- Contact:
what would the gear be? an rca to usb cable of some sort?
people must do cassette to cdr conversion often.
I do mini disc to cdr conversion by going mini disc into hard disc, hard disc optical out to usb into computer into Cooleditpro then thru any cd burning app. Guess I could just go cassette into hard disc, otpical out etc..... hey wait a minute i already Have the equipment! Me AM smart afterall!
people must do cassette to cdr conversion often.
I do mini disc to cdr conversion by going mini disc into hard disc, hard disc optical out to usb into computer into Cooleditpro then thru any cd burning app. Guess I could just go cassette into hard disc, otpical out etc..... hey wait a minute i already Have the equipment! Me AM smart afterall!
me make purty musick!
-
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:09 am
As far as digital conversion, I plug my 4-track into an Alesis USB mixer.
A safer way to demagnatize a 4-track is getting a TrackMate cassette head cleaner/demagnetizer. It's got some magnets in it that do the trick perfectly, and it has a brush to clean the capstan and erase head too. I picked one up at Radio Shack for 20 CDN$
A safer way to demagnatize a 4-track is getting a TrackMate cassette head cleaner/demagnetizer. It's got some magnets in it that do the trick perfectly, and it has a brush to clean the capstan and erase head too. I picked one up at Radio Shack for 20 CDN$
- ;ivlunsdystf
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
- Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
- Contact:
Tascam 424mkiii - scored a few weeks ago - has an output for each individual track which seems to bypass the mixer - preamp section is annoying because there apparently are no balanced ins, but now I'm glad I hung onto my ART toob MP, which inputs just fine to the Tascam.
The auto punch system (even with the help of a manual) is pretty strange in how it is set up. It works just fine though. I am having lots and lots of fun with this whole gizmo. It's pretty tricky to go back to linear-style recording after being so addicted to punching and looping on a computer/soundcard system for the past few years. Before I press 'record' I actually need to have a plan, because I can't just edit my way through each track.
The auto punch system (even with the help of a manual) is pretty strange in how it is set up. It works just fine though. I am having lots and lots of fun with this whole gizmo. It's pretty tricky to go back to linear-style recording after being so addicted to punching and looping on a computer/soundcard system for the past few years. Before I press 'record' I actually need to have a plan, because I can't just edit my way through each track.
This is my first post and firstly i want to thank all who are here and have provided a wealth of tips and opinions that have been most helpful.
I have had a few 4-track cassette units and loved the yamaha the best feature being the 4 individual outputs so you can transfer easily to a computer if you want to further edit. not sure why more units never adopted that design. As for now i am using the fostex MD8 HD and its great for writing sketches and portable recording. good luck
I have had a few 4-track cassette units and loved the yamaha the best feature being the 4 individual outputs so you can transfer easily to a computer if you want to further edit. not sure why more units never adopted that design. As for now i am using the fostex MD8 HD and its great for writing sketches and portable recording. good luck
- I'm Painting Again
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:15 am
- Location: New York, New York
- Contact:
it depends if you want to capture all the outputs of the tape source to keep them to different tracks or not..if not and you only need stereo..sony makes a nice stereo cd-burner hardware deck..there is the alesis masterlink also..that one has an internal hard drive..if you need to keep the tracks seperate you can get a 4 or more channel computer interface thingie and do it on a pc..you could also do the first stereo way with the pc of course..chovie d wrote:what would the gear be?
Just last week I dug out my trusty old Yamaha MT1X that I bought used in 1992- I paid $300 for it at the time, which was a good deal because it was one of the few that would record 4 tracks simultaneously, and had 4 tape outputs.
Right now I'm going through and transferring tapes I made back then to my PC, to mix in Audacity. I've gotten out of music making/recording so I don't want to spend any money on this project, which means I have a pretty convoluted system-
I record two tracks at a time into a standalone CD burner, then import into the PC as wav. files. I then sync 'em up in Audacity. The trick is, there are 6 tracks spread over two tapes- we recorded Drums stereo on 1&2, Guitar 3, Bass 4, then submixed these into a stereo pair on another cassette deck. Then we added two more tracks (vox and lead gtr) onto that tape. Naturally, the second deck ran at a slightly different speed than the MT1X, so the "overdub" tracks don't sync up to the "base" tracks on the other tape. Good thing for the "speed" adjust in Audacity!
Anyway, I was amazed at how good these tracks sounded- we recorded in an unused bedroom in the basement (amps in the hall), with a borrowed Peavey mixer and bagfull of SM58s. The Peavey and Yamaha sat in the garage "control room"- this was a pretty bigtime setup for 4 trackers in 1992! I didn't really know what the hell I was doing and some of my experiments were dumb, but the Yamaha never let me down.
Some friends of mine made a CD on a 488 cassette 8 track, and it sounds like total shit. I never heard anything done on cassette 8 track that I thought sounded good.
This project is what got me to drop by the TOMB for the first time in about a year... and it's just as cool as ever!
Right now I'm going through and transferring tapes I made back then to my PC, to mix in Audacity. I've gotten out of music making/recording so I don't want to spend any money on this project, which means I have a pretty convoluted system-
I record two tracks at a time into a standalone CD burner, then import into the PC as wav. files. I then sync 'em up in Audacity. The trick is, there are 6 tracks spread over two tapes- we recorded Drums stereo on 1&2, Guitar 3, Bass 4, then submixed these into a stereo pair on another cassette deck. Then we added two more tracks (vox and lead gtr) onto that tape. Naturally, the second deck ran at a slightly different speed than the MT1X, so the "overdub" tracks don't sync up to the "base" tracks on the other tape. Good thing for the "speed" adjust in Audacity!
Anyway, I was amazed at how good these tracks sounded- we recorded in an unused bedroom in the basement (amps in the hall), with a borrowed Peavey mixer and bagfull of SM58s. The Peavey and Yamaha sat in the garage "control room"- this was a pretty bigtime setup for 4 trackers in 1992! I didn't really know what the hell I was doing and some of my experiments were dumb, but the Yamaha never let me down.
Some friends of mine made a CD on a 488 cassette 8 track, and it sounds like total shit. I never heard anything done on cassette 8 track that I thought sounded good.
This project is what got me to drop by the TOMB for the first time in about a year... and it's just as cool as ever!
Steve Albini used to like it
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 6:40 am
- Location: a mile west of the crossroads & the old circus grounds
I still find uses for my Tascam 234. It's a deck only, no attached mixer. When fed from some decent front end gear, it has a great sound considering the usable track area of cassette. I have used it as sort of a mixdown effect for some stuff. It doesn?t sound like 2 inch obviously, but there is definitely a tape compression thing going on there. Sort of a poor mans Distressor.
DinoG
DinoG
I'd gladly trade everything I have now for a nice sounding room and a bucket of 57's
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:25 am
- Location: Kansas City
- Contact:
recording to both sides? cassette speeds/tape length
Here's a dumb question. Can you record to both sides of a cassette, or if I record on side B is it going to mess up what I've recorded onto side A? Also, I am recording at 9.5 cps. If I buy 30 min tapes (15x2) does that mean I'm getting 7 1/2 minutes of recording time?
PS - I love my new 4-track!!!!
PS - I love my new 4-track!!!!
I will see you there, or I will see you at another time.
- The Real MC
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:50 am
- Location: Tranquil secluded country
- Contact:
-
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:22 am
- Location: Ramah, New Mexico
Way cool RMC! Beautiful!The Real MC wrote:I still record with a Tascam 246, bought new in 1989. The mixer isn't the greatest but it has plenty of patch I/O to a better board and the fidelity of the tape system is excellent. How many cassette multitracks have dual FX busses and two band sweepable EQ?
And like pouxhawk's 234, I love the sound of Tascam's built-in levelar's. Tascam stuff has always had such a great 'discreet' sound.
"The mushroom states its own position very clearly. It says, "I require the nervous system of a mammal. Do you have one handy?" Terrence McKenna
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests