Firewire 400 vs 800

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
gutsofgold
pushin' record
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:38 pm

Firewire 400 vs 800

Post by gutsofgold » Sat May 13, 2006 10:58 am

My PC has a great motherboard with FW800 and I run a MOTU 828mkII with it. No problems with stuttering or bad latency. However, I'm going to be getting a new Mac Book Pro (the 15") and it only has FW400. Will I notice a difference when recording? Overall (just to make note) the specs on the PC and the specs on the Mac Book are almost the same. 2GHz, 1 gig of ram, 100GB harddrive, etc...

Thanks!

thethingwiththestuff
george martin
Posts: 1296
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:00 pm
Location: philly

Post by thethingwiththestuff » Sat May 13, 2006 11:14 am

you run an 828mk2 off of 800? are you sure? how do you get the 828's cable into the 800 port jack?

John Jeffers
buyin' a studio
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:16 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Post by John Jeffers » Sat May 13, 2006 2:33 pm

Even if you're running the 828 off a FW800 port, the 828 itself is only FW400. You shouldn't notice any difference running it from a FW400 port.

thething...800 is backward-compatible with 400, and you can get an adapter to run FW400 devices on an 800 port.

thethingwiththestuff
george martin
Posts: 1296
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:00 pm
Location: philly

Post by thethingwiththestuff » Sat May 13, 2006 3:03 pm

ah, fair enough. thanks

gutsofgold
pushin' record
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:38 pm

Post by gutsofgold » Sat May 13, 2006 3:19 pm

thats good to know.
thanks.

asmara
steve albini likes it
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:12 am
Location: Minneapolis

what about fireface

Post by asmara » Sun May 14, 2006 1:37 pm

I have fireface 800 and always wondered if I should be using the 800 firewire port.
For now the cost of an appropriate cable is prohibitive. But I have never had any problem with the 400FW line running all 8 analog AD/DA
anyone use these?

User avatar
Jeff White
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3263
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jeff White » Mon May 15, 2006 9:17 am

I have found that FW800 is better for read/write to disk than FW400. Obvious, right?

I use a Lacie D2 external FW800 (also has one FW400 and one USB2.0) as the record drive for my Powerbook G4. I run my MOTU 828mkii through a FW PCMCIA card so that audio and read/write data are running on separate FW busses. My PB is a 1.5ghz G4 with 768MB of RAM. I record everything at 24bit/44.1kHz and can easily record 8 tracks simultaneously while playing back up to 24 additional tracks. I'm using Digital Performer 4.61.

Jeff

street
audio school
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:51 pm
Location: minneapolis
Contact:

G4 FW bus

Post by street » Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:58 pm

An odd bit of architecture on the G4 PowerBooks: FW800 and FW400 are on the same bus, which acts as an 800 bus if the only thing connected on it is 800, but acts as a 400 if an 800 and a 400 thing are both connected to it. This bit of arcana cost me several nights of anguish. Long may you run.
Never let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

User avatar
Jeff White
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3263
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: G4 FW bus

Post by Jeff White » Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:06 am

street wrote:An odd bit of architecture on the G4 PowerBooks: FW800 and FW400 are on the same bus, which acts as an 800 bus if the only thing connected on it is 800, but acts as a 400 if an 800 and a 400 thing are both connected to it. This bit of arcana cost me several nights of anguish. Long may you run.
This is why I picked up a PCMCIA FW400card. It keeps my drive and 828mkii on separate busses, and allows me to use FW800 for read/write. I have zero complaints regarding this setup.

Jeff

griff505
audio school graduate
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:06 am

Post by griff505 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:09 am

does your D2 external FW800 make a hell of a noise. Mine does, and has done since i got it years ago. no problems with it other than the noise. thinking of replacing it with a quieter porsche drive.

on the other topic, crazy that the new macbook pros haven't got fw800, maybe the next revision will, well, revise this......

User avatar
Jeff White
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3263
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jeff White » Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:08 pm

griff505 wrote:does your D2 external FW800 make a hell of a noise. Mine does, and has done since i got it years ago. no problems with it other than the noise. thinking of replacing it with a quieter porsche drive.
I haven't had any problems with it getting on my nerves yet. How are the Porsche drives?
griff505 wrote:on the other topic, crazy that the new macbook pros haven't got fw800, maybe the next revision will, well, revise this......
The 17" version has FW400 & FW800. I wish that the 15" had it as well. However, you can just get a FW card for the expansion slot and run a second FW buss. Those computers are so much faster than PBs that I can't see read/write being a problem at all. I guess that they are marketing the 17" with the FW800 for video producing guys and gals.

Jeff

griff505
audio school graduate
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:06 am

Post by griff505 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:16 pm

the porsche has a low level writing noise, nothing like the D2 however, which is driving me round the bend.

sounds like i will have to update the powerbook, maybe next year....

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 165 guests