The Tascam 388

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
User avatar
markjazzbassist
tinnitus
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:33 am
Location: Cleveland

Post by markjazzbassist » Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:47 am

i don't have the 388 anymore. i'm talking about selling my rig to get another 388.

Mark
tinnitus
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Leicester, Uk
Contact:

Post by Mark » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:15 pm

So I guess you've done the comparison and come to the conclusion that the 388 is of far greater efficacy. 8)

User avatar
markjazzbassist
tinnitus
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:33 am
Location: Cleveland

Post by markjazzbassist » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:20 pm

nope, read my post. i sold the 388 because i wanted 15 IPS and more track width. the 388 is 7.5 IPS and width is equivalent to a 1" 24 track. The 3340S is 15 IPS and equivalent to a 1" 16 track.

The reason i'm thinking about going back is because of the ease of use of the 388 with the built in mixer and I don't even really know if I need 15 IPS and the track width. I'm recording Funk/Jazz kinda stuff so the extra low end might be nice.

I was asking if anyone thought i was crazy for thinking these thoughts or going back.

User avatar
markjazzbassist
tinnitus
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:33 am
Location: Cleveland

Post by markjazzbassist » Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:50 pm

after doing a 7.5 IPS to 15 IPS comparison today i was surprised that I actually like 7.5 IPS better. Way more character in the low end (i'm a bassist) and low mids. The highs are nice on 15 IPS but not worth the cost of the low end missing.

back to a 388 here i come!

Mark
tinnitus
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Leicester, Uk
Contact:

Post by Mark » Wed Mar 27, 2013 4:15 pm

:^:

Welcome back :D

User avatar
shedshrine
deaf.
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: sf bay area

Post by shedshrine » Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:48 pm

Image
"Man crushed by nearly 30 year old recording behemoth"
Brighton-United Kingdom


btw- They are reliable once you get them up to spec. You just see a lot of problems posted here as people are trying to do just that, get an old unit up to spec. (yes, they are all old, I know) This thread and sweetbeats thread on homerecording have got to be the largest devoted to this beast on the net and so likely places to post a "how do I fix the xyz on my 388".

j.harv
gettin' sounds
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:47 am
Location: Cambridge,Ont,Canada

Post by j.harv » Tue Apr 02, 2013 3:40 pm

markjazzbassist wrote:after doing a 7.5 IPS to 15 IPS comparison today i was surprised that I actually like 7.5 IPS better. Way more character in the low end (i'm a bassist) and low mids. The highs are nice on 15 IPS but not worth the cost of the low end missing.

back to a 388 here i come!
Good stuff!!!
Jack whites last album was recorded at 7.5ips on 2" 8 trk.

LimpyLoo
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:10 pm

Post by LimpyLoo » Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:32 pm

hey guys

i need to replace the fuses in my 388

i have no idea what i'm doing

can anyone point me in the right direction?

thx

User avatar
shedshrine
deaf.
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: sf bay area

Post by shedshrine » Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:46 pm


LimpyLoo
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:10 pm

Post by LimpyLoo » Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:57 pm

oh cool thx a bunch

jonobrienwaller
audio school
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:00 pm

Post by jonobrienwaller » Tue Jul 23, 2013 12:28 am

i'm trying to hook up my tascam 388 to my hear technologies hearback monitoring system, but before I buy the right cables I was wondering which outputs i should use for such a thing?

I'd like to be able track a live band and let them have control over their mixes at the studio.

thanks!

fuz(warm)zy
audio school
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:57 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Post by fuz(warm)zy » Fri Aug 23, 2013 12:14 pm

I recently purchased a 388. I couldn't get any playback so I took it to an engineering friend but he couldn't figure it out either (and said "There is no playback whatsoever electrically; mechanically it works fine. There is no output on the stereo outputs from either the recorder or any of the 8 inputs"). Any suggestions? Thanks

Afunk
audio school graduate
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 7:44 am
Location: Brooklyn NY

Tascam 388 Service & Repair ? Brooklyn NY

Post by Afunk » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:41 pm

We service Tascam 388 + all open reel machines.
Servicing these since new 35 years experience.

Located in Brooklyn NY
Funktional Technologies

User avatar
james_cassidy
audio school
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:09 pm

388!

Post by james_cassidy » Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:20 am

Hey, yeah, I just recorded an album with my 388. I record vocals, drums, guitars, organs, piano and then do the rest (bass, backing vocals, whatever else), in Sonar. I like to think of myself in the Grandaddy, Sparklehorse, Flaming Lips, Mercury Rev, Daniel Johnston and Spiritualized family of musicians. You can hear some racks here: https://soundcloud.com/the-autumn-stone

WhinyLittleRunt
ass engineer
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:22 am

Post by WhinyLittleRunt » Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:36 pm

Just picked up a few reels of Scotch 150 tape... Anyone have good/bad experiences using any Scotch formulation on their 388? Waiting to use it until i hear some feedback...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 103 guests