what is the recipe for an amazing sounding triangle?
what is the recipe for an amazing sounding triangle?
i recorded some triangle for a few songs i am working on and the tone sounds pretty good. (KM84 > PM1000 > Digi 001)
the hits are fairly consistent, but not as even as i would like them. ive been playing with compression and minor gating, which definitely helps, its just not quite there yet.
i am contemplating picking the best hit and copying it for all of them, but im not ready for that yet. anyone have any other suggestions?
the hits are fairly consistent, but not as even as i would like them. ive been playing with compression and minor gating, which definitely helps, its just not quite there yet.
i am contemplating picking the best hit and copying it for all of them, but im not ready for that yet. anyone have any other suggestions?
If the triangle is a fairly steady part, or at least regularly comes and goes in a single song, I prefer NOT to pick the best single one and drop it everywhere. That usually sounds to "mechanical" or "generated" or something to me. Not organic like a real triangle. You tried to get 'em all the same and didn't quite make it, right? Welcome to the triangle...they can be like that. Instead of finding the best one, I look for the crappiest two or three, and replace those with one of the keepers; sometimes the same keeper, sometimes several different of the keepers. I try to work with the flow and mood of the song so the edits sound more like part of the performance than an edit or a 'dub.
If the part is spare, and the triangle is just a single hit for emphasis, then maybe you can get away with using the same one. Distance between hits in a song really helps with the "copy one everywhere" approach...
If the part is spare, and the triangle is just a single hit for emphasis, then maybe you can get away with using the same one. Distance between hits in a song really helps with the "copy one everywhere" approach...
I thought this club was for musicians. Who let the drummer in here??
- pantone247
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:42 am
djimbe wrote:Instead of finding the best one, I look for the crappiest two or three, and replace those with one of the keepers; sometimes the same keeper, sometimes several different of the keepers. /quote]
good advice
if you do end up cutting pasting, try and find a few hits and arrange them in a row, if you then have to copy or loop this do it in 3 or 5's or 6's, not 4's or 8's cause I find (if your songs in 4/4) you start getting a loopy pattern off them, rather then a natural feel
INDIE TILL I DIE
Re: what is the recipe for an amazing sounding triangle?
haha! For some reason I assumed this thread was a put-on..out of tune wrote:i recorded some triangle for a few songs i am working on and the tone sounds pretty good. (KM84 > PM1000 > Digi 001)
the hits are fairly consistent, but not as even as i would like them. ive been playing with compression and minor gating, which definitely helps, its just not quite there yet.
i am contemplating picking the best hit and copying it for all of them, but im not ready for that yet. anyone have any other suggestions?
I would say just practice a bit getting the hits more consistent. I don't agree with cutting and pasting. What fun is that?
beware bee wear
It's so true, though. Black Swamp also makes fantastic triangles. They're not cheap, but they are the real deal. Also, check out the beater you are using; it could help to go lighter or heavier, depending on the capability of the percussionist.This sounds really retarded, but do you have a good sounding triangle
-
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:57 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
No doubt about securing a quality source to begin with. I was reluctant accompaniment to a lesser mortal who still shops at guitar center (just kidding), where I experienced first-hand that which is the "guitar center triangle". I am not sure what series of harmonics should be expected from a triangle, however, the tone emitted was all over the place. A filtered derivative of white noise...absolutely unusable musically. I would also start with a decent instrument.
- Bill @ Irie Lab
- suffering 'studio suck'
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:53 am
- Location: Boston, USA
- Contact:
Dear OOT,
In textbooks I've read on arranging for orchestra they relate that because of the unique harmonic series (up to pooch hearing only frequencies) of the triangle little thought need be given to it being heard in the densest arrangement. The amount of massed strings, horn blasts, kettle drum rolls, etc. that occur concurrently are of no consequence - the conservatory dude's way of saying "it'll cut through the mix".
This leads me to suggest (although I haven't tried it) that having the trianglist (?) play while tracking the drums wiould be picked up fine by the room or overhead mics.
Making it more organic to the percussion? I don't know; just thinking out loud. Not worthy to even be called my two cents.
Bill
In textbooks I've read on arranging for orchestra they relate that because of the unique harmonic series (up to pooch hearing only frequencies) of the triangle little thought need be given to it being heard in the densest arrangement. The amount of massed strings, horn blasts, kettle drum rolls, etc. that occur concurrently are of no consequence - the conservatory dude's way of saying "it'll cut through the mix".
This leads me to suggest (although I haven't tried it) that having the trianglist (?) play while tracking the drums wiould be picked up fine by the room or overhead mics.
Making it more organic to the percussion? I don't know; just thinking out loud. Not worthy to even be called my two cents.
Bill
I&TC - Intonation and Technology Company
Irie Lab Sound Studios
***** Sound Science & Soul *****
Irie Lab Sound Studios
***** Sound Science & Soul *****
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests