Do you EQ on the recording chain?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

AudioJunky
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Do you EQ on the recording chain?

Post by AudioJunky » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:19 pm

Do most of you find that if you have to EQ on the chain to the DAW, that you probably need to use a different mic... or do you just EQ until happy with the tone?

RefD
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5993
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:10 pm

Post by RefD » Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:36 pm

going in, i get as far as i can with the source + mic + technique and then lean on EQ as little as i can.

but there's always exceptions.
?What need is there to weep over parts of life? The whole of it calls for tears.? -- Seneca

User avatar
Mark Alan Miller
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2097
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Western MA
Contact:

Post by Mark Alan Miller » Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:38 pm

RefD wrote:going in, i get as far as i can with the source + mic + technique and then lean on EQ as little as i can.

but there's always exceptions.
Yep, pretty much!
he took a duck in the face at two and hundred fifty knots.

http://www.radio-valkyrie.com/ao/aoindex.htm - download the new record (free is an option!) or get it on CD.

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:28 pm

Me three, unless I've got something obviously "manufactured" in mind.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

directaction
gettin' sounds
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:33 am
Location: New York, NY

Post by directaction » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:52 pm

yeah, if you can get a good mix from the start, you'll experience less degradation of your sound quality from either sub-par eq plug-ins or converting to and from analog again (this is assuming you're recording digitally)

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:25 am

Lately the only EQ I've been applying on the way in has been a little low-end rolloff here and there, and a couple of weeks ago I boosted some high end. But that was with a GML pre so I think I managed to avoid the sub-par signal path thingy. :wink:

Generally I will rely on source sound and mic selection though.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

Professor
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:11 pm
Location: I have arrived... but where the hell am I?

Post by Professor » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:10 am

The mic and the placement are the 'tone controls' for the signal while tracking... except for perhaps a low roll-off to dump ot HVAC or other rumblin' stuff.
It takes the same amount of energy to EQ on the way in or during mixdown, except one causes more stress and is harder to undo later if it's not the right sound.

-Jeremy

User avatar
Fletcher
steve albini likes it
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 7:38 am
Location: M?nchen
Contact:

Post by Fletcher » Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:26 am

Using microphone selection and placement as your main "tone control" is without a doubt the best course of action... but after you have gotten the sound pretty much where you want it in "solo"... and then combine it with the other sounds that will comprise the song I have often found that there will be an area in the "sonic arrangement" that is either getting jammed up or left unfulfilled... at which point an equalizer is a wonderful tool to get the sound to work and play well with the rest of the arrangement.

Recording with no equalizers what so ever is a great learning excercize that has made me a far better recording engineer... but at the end of the day when it is commercial product and I have to put my best audio forward [as opposed to a low or no pay demo where I'm doing it so I can experiment with stuff instead of charging what I should charge]... equalizers are a very important part of the program.

Peace.

User avatar
JohnDavisNYC
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3035
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 2:43 pm
Location: crooklyn, ny
Contact:

Post by JohnDavisNYC » Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:17 am

there is a reason why pretty much every console has an EQ on every channel... there is nothing wrong with using EQ!

the only times that I eq on the way in are when I'm recording to tape, and there are sounds that I know I will want brighter in the mix, and don't want to EQ later and just bring up the hiss along with the high end, like fingerstyle acoustic guitar, brushes on snare, etc... if i overdo it, it's easy to just use the same EQ on mixdown and knock off a bit of the highs, and deal with some tape hiss as well.

If EQ was such a terrible thing, something tells me Pultecs and 10xx modules wouldn't be so coveted.

John
i like to make music with music and stuff and things.

http://www.thebunkerstudio.com/

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Post by joel hamilton » Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:33 am

Going to tape I may throw some pre-emphasis in line with something that I like for eq. The EQ should be something that you like the tone of before you even twist a knob...

That being said, I rarely EQ on the way in, but when I do it is for a very specific reason. If I know I want a little more thwack or boom on the kick I may throw a little massive passive at it on the way in.... or I may even throw some top on a vocal, just so i can cut a little during the mix with a plug and then boost again with a pultec and have the vocal "hold its tone" even with a ton of compression.

Every situation is unique, so none of these statements should be interpreted as a "rule" by any means.

Do whatcha need to do to get it to sound right. when I didnt have a bunch of mic's i eq'd to tape all the time. Nothing wrong with it at all. There is nothing "wrong" with doing anything in the name of making something sound good. That is what it is all about, period.

User avatar
Fletcher
steve albini likes it
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 7:38 am
Location: M?nchen
Contact:

Post by Fletcher » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:18 pm

as talking more about midrange sonic arrangements that "pre-emphasis" for keeping tape noise at bay... and like I mentioned, it was a great exercize to work without equalizers of any kind for a couple of years... really helped me hone my microphone selection and placement chops.

Best of luck with it.

ceilingcat84
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:05 am
Location: washington, dc

Post by ceilingcat84 » Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:27 pm

I try to avoid using eq at all during tracking so i can learn which mics and mic placements work for which applications. so far i haven't run into situations where i know beforehand which elements of the mix are going to need eq, so i save it for teh mixdown phase.

User avatar
I'm Painting Again
zen recordist
Posts: 7086
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:15 am
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by I'm Painting Again » Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:05 pm

I used to be die hard against EQ..though now I've grown comfortable using a good EQ on the way in to put it in the spot I want..so yeah just know exactly what you want to do and set it..bing bang boom..if your not sure wait till after..I've been EQing electric guitar on the way in mostly in recent sessions..

User avatar
dokushoka
buyin' a studio
Posts: 811
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: San Francisco / L.A.
Contact:

Post by dokushoka » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:37 pm

Twisting knobs always makes it look like you're doing something important and that the client is getting their money's worth. Why not do it? :wink:

Professor
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:11 pm
Location: I have arrived... but where the hell am I?

Post by Professor » Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:24 am

That's pretty much the philosophy that made Funk Logic a successful company, isn't it?

-J

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests