External hard drive recommendations?
- bipedal
- alignin' 24-trk
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:21 am
- Location: Western Mass now, Mpls then
External hard drive recommendations?
Long-time TOMB lurker, first-time poster. Am newbie recordist, small-scale recording & mixing projects at home, rarely working with more than 8 tracks simultaneously so far. Using Tracktion 2 on a Toshiba laptop, WinXP.
I know that a secondary hard drive is strongly recommended for audio file storage as it keeps the main hard drive free to support system functions...
For an external drive, am seeking recommendations on:
1) Connection type - USB 2.0 vs. FireWire? (From what I?ve read, USB 2.0 is theoretically faster, but for most practical applications FireWire transfers data more rapidly. Is it a significant difference?)
2) Is 7200 rpm sufficient?
3) Good, reliable hard drive brands? (Or brands to avoid?)
- thanks in advance
I know that a secondary hard drive is strongly recommended for audio file storage as it keeps the main hard drive free to support system functions...
For an external drive, am seeking recommendations on:
1) Connection type - USB 2.0 vs. FireWire? (From what I?ve read, USB 2.0 is theoretically faster, but for most practical applications FireWire transfers data more rapidly. Is it a significant difference?)
2) Is 7200 rpm sufficient?
3) Good, reliable hard drive brands? (Or brands to avoid?)
- thanks in advance
1) USB theoretically has slightly more bandwidth, but it takes a lot more resources to run. You'll want those resources for your audio apps. Firewire is the way to go.
2) 7200rpm and up is recommended
3) Which brand to use is debateable, but I like Seagate. They have proven reliable to me and are pretty quiet.
2) 7200rpm and up is recommended
3) Which brand to use is debateable, but I like Seagate. They have proven reliable to me and are pretty quiet.
I think women should leave the toilet seat UP!!!
7200 rpm should be just fine. Seagate Barracudas were great drives for this - I'm not sure about now, as it's been a while since I got one!
USB VS. FW...hmm find out what is best for your computer config and what is suggested by Mackie support. http://www.kvraudio.com/ is a good site to go to share compatibility info.
You can get an external drive in enclosure from Other World Computing for a good price which comes with all the connectivity you will need.
Best,
H
USB VS. FW...hmm find out what is best for your computer config and what is suggested by Mackie support. http://www.kvraudio.com/ is a good site to go to share compatibility info.
You can get an external drive in enclosure from Other World Computing for a good price which comes with all the connectivity you will need.
Best,
H
-
- alignin' 24-trk
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:05 am
- Location: washington, dc
- inflatable
- pushin' record
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:31 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
I'd go with eSATA. Yeah, you likely will have to install a card in your system, but the data rates are much higher than USB or Firewire. The only problem is if you need to transfer your sessions to another computer that doesn't have eSATA. In that case you need one of these:
http://www.newertech.com/products/usb2_adapt.php
Here's the specs on eSATA compared to USB2 and FW400:
Interface speed:
USB: 480 Mbits /sec
FW: 400 Mbits /sec
eSATA: 1500 Mbits /sec
64k read:
USB: 31.6 Mbytes /sec
FW 34.8 Mbytes /sec
eSATA 56.4 Mbytes /sec
64k write:
USB: 26.5 Mbytes /sec
FW 26.7 Mbytes /sec
eSATA 54.2 Mbytes /sec
Burst xfer rate:
USB: 33.5 Mbytes /sec
FW 36.2 Mbytes /sec
eSATA 111.3 Mbytes /sec
Data taken from the eSATA at sata-io.org
www.sata-io.org/docs/External%20SATA%20WP%2011-09.pdf
This is the future people. FW and USB are peripheral connection technology adapted to hard drives. eSATA is built for hard drives. Leave the USB and FW to Video cameras and flash drives.
Here's the wikipedia blurb:
Aimed at the consumer (laptop/desktop) market, eSATA enters an external storage market already served by the USB and Firewire interfaces. As virtually all external hard-drives incorporate PATA or SATA drives with an additional bridge-interface (USB/Firewire), current USB/Firewire drives suffer from two sources of inefficiency. The first source is protocol translation between the drive's native-interface (PATA or SATA) and the enclosure's external-interface (Firewire or USB2.) In the case of USB2, protocol overhead limits the maximum usable bandwidth to a fraction of the physical-signaling rate. In contemporary (500GB+) devices, the USB2's ideal-case transfer-rate already bottlenecks the drive-media. Firewire is more efficient (courtesy of a defined isochronous transfer mode), but the vast majority of Mac/PC Firewire ports use the older 1394/A (400Mbps) signalling-rate. This limited effective data transfer rate becomes very visible when using an external RAID array and also with fast single disks which may yield well over 70 MB/s during real use. [citation needed] Finally, some low-level drive features, such as S.M.A.R.T., are not usable through USB2/Firewire bridging. eSATA does not suffer from the above issues.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#External_SATA
http://www.newertech.com/products/usb2_adapt.php
Here's the specs on eSATA compared to USB2 and FW400:
Interface speed:
USB: 480 Mbits /sec
FW: 400 Mbits /sec
eSATA: 1500 Mbits /sec
64k read:
USB: 31.6 Mbytes /sec
FW 34.8 Mbytes /sec
eSATA 56.4 Mbytes /sec
64k write:
USB: 26.5 Mbytes /sec
FW 26.7 Mbytes /sec
eSATA 54.2 Mbytes /sec
Burst xfer rate:
USB: 33.5 Mbytes /sec
FW 36.2 Mbytes /sec
eSATA 111.3 Mbytes /sec
Data taken from the eSATA at sata-io.org
www.sata-io.org/docs/External%20SATA%20WP%2011-09.pdf
This is the future people. FW and USB are peripheral connection technology adapted to hard drives. eSATA is built for hard drives. Leave the USB and FW to Video cameras and flash drives.
Here's the wikipedia blurb:
Aimed at the consumer (laptop/desktop) market, eSATA enters an external storage market already served by the USB and Firewire interfaces. As virtually all external hard-drives incorporate PATA or SATA drives with an additional bridge-interface (USB/Firewire), current USB/Firewire drives suffer from two sources of inefficiency. The first source is protocol translation between the drive's native-interface (PATA or SATA) and the enclosure's external-interface (Firewire or USB2.) In the case of USB2, protocol overhead limits the maximum usable bandwidth to a fraction of the physical-signaling rate. In contemporary (500GB+) devices, the USB2's ideal-case transfer-rate already bottlenecks the drive-media. Firewire is more efficient (courtesy of a defined isochronous transfer mode), but the vast majority of Mac/PC Firewire ports use the older 1394/A (400Mbps) signalling-rate. This limited effective data transfer rate becomes very visible when using an external RAID array and also with fast single disks which may yield well over 70 MB/s during real use. [citation needed] Finally, some low-level drive features, such as S.M.A.R.T., are not usable through USB2/Firewire bridging. eSATA does not suffer from the above issues.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#External_SATA
- inflatable
- pushin' record
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:31 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
The OWC external enclosures do not have eSATA ports to hook up to your computer. They do not have internal "to drive" SATA connections either. They use older and cheaper PATA drives. Not a big deal right now, but PATA is dying fast.UXB wrote:The OWC drives support firewire, usb2, and eSata, I think.
The Universal Adapter http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Newer%20 ... /U2NVSPATA I mentioned before is made by the same company as the OWC enclosures.
The Seagate eSATA drive comes with a eSATA card. Most PCs need to add a card to do firewire. What DAW can't use more tracks? My internal IBM ATA Hard Drive's real-world transfer rate is 42 MB/sec using 64k blocks. (I tested this with Bart's Stuff Test 5 http://www.nu2.nu/download.php?sFile=bst514.zip) That's a full 10 MB/s greater than USB or FireWire is even capable of. 1/3 more tracks sounds good to me. And backups are 1/3 faster.UXB wrote:While eSata is the best throughput, you probably won't need it at this point, and will need to get a pcm card to support it.
I stand by my original advice. eSATA is where I'm headed for all my future storage needs.
Or you could just get a Seagate USB2/FireWire drive and tell me to shut up about the future.
-
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:51 pm
- Location: Bay Area
I'm definitely not one of the IT peeps on this board, but I've had good luck with a simple Western Digital 7200 rpm USB drive -- the kind Dell will sell you already in a case.
Your audio needs sound pretty modest to me -- are you having problems doing 8 tracks to the internal drive?
Also, how fast is the internal drive -- 5400? 7200? 10k? I have a vague memory, which could be wrong, that a 7200 rpm secondary drive may be less helpful if the primary drive is 5400.
Your audio needs sound pretty modest to me -- are you having problems doing 8 tracks to the internal drive?
Also, how fast is the internal drive -- 5400? 7200? 10k? I have a vague memory, which could be wrong, that a 7200 rpm secondary drive may be less helpful if the primary drive is 5400.
"The world don't need no more songs." - Bob Dylan
"Why does the Creator send me such knuckleheads?" - Sun Ra
.
.
.
.
"Why does the Creator send me such knuckleheads?" - Sun Ra
.
.
.
.
- inflatable
- pushin' record
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:31 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
It shouldn't matter what the system drive spins at if your data drive is fast enough.percussion boy wrote:I'm definitely not one of the IT peeps on this board, but I've had good luck with a simple Western Digital 7200 rpm USB drive -- the kind Dell will sell you already in a case.
Your audio needs sound pretty modest to me -- are you having problems doing 8 tracks to the internal drive?
Also, how fast is the internal drive -- 5400? 7200? 10k? I have a vague memory, which could be wrong, that a 7200 rpm secondary drive may be less helpful if the primary drive is 5400.
- bipedal
- alignin' 24-trk
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:21 am
- Location: Western Mass now, Mpls then
No real probs with internal drive, I guess
The internal drive is 5400. Honestly, I can't say I've experienced any problems using the internal drive... One hiccup once or twice, but that may have been a CPU issue rather than storage. I just notice that when I'm working on a project the 'hard drive in use' light is constantly flickering -- I thought maybe adding an external drive for the audio file storage might give the main drive a little breather (and extend its life...).percussion boy wrote:I'm definitely not one of the IT peeps on this board, but I've had good luck with a simple Western Digital 7200 rpm USB drive -- the kind Dell will sell you already in a case.
Your audio needs sound pretty modest to me -- are you having problems doing 8 tracks to the internal drive?
Also, how fast is the internal drive -- 5400? 7200? 10k? I have a vague memory, which could be wrong, that a 7200 rpm secondary drive may be less helpful if the primary drive is 5400.
Thanks all for eSATA recommendations too - will check it out to see if it's a possibility (budget wise).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests