digital masters (raw tracks)

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Kyle
steve albini likes it
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Portland OR
Contact:

digital masters (raw tracks)

Post by Kyle » Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:01 pm

I'm curious...

How many of you guys give your clients some kind of digital masters (Raw tracks, not mixes) once they pay the bill? Do you burn them to DVD, if they didn't purchase their own hard drive?

If you store a copy of the masters, how much do you charge the client if they want an additional copy of those tracks at a later date?

A friend of mine is trying to get some of his raw tracks from an engineer for a session that he recorded a few years ago (he never received these raw tracks at the end of his session) Now the engineer is charging him 100 dollars to post the raw files of one song to his server so I can download them for a remix.

I've always received raw tracks once my bills are paid and/or given the masters to the client if I'm on the opposite end of the transaction.

I've never been in this position, anyone else?
What would you expect to pay for your master tracks?
Kyle

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Re: digital masters (raw tracks)

Post by cgarges » Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:53 pm

Kyle wrote:What would you expect to pay for your master tracks?
Whatever was discussed at the time of the session.

Something like this was just discussed recently.
http://messageboard.tapeop.com/viewtopic.php?t=44932

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

User avatar
@?,*???&?
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5804
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Just left on the FM dial
Contact:

Post by @?,*???&? » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:52 am

$25 an hour for back-up- always. I discuss this prior to starting a project with the client so there are no 'surprise' charges.

When the project is finished and onces it's been mastered, I burn 2 sets of CDRs preferably to 2 kinds of media.

MoreSpaceEcho
zen recordist
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am

Re: digital masters (raw tracks)

Post by MoreSpaceEcho » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:29 am

Kyle wrote: Now the engineer is charging him 100 dollars to post the raw files of one song to his server so I can download them for a remix.
100 bucks seems kinda steep, but posting all the files for a song seems to me like it'd take forever and would take up a ton of space. for me it'd be a lot easier to just burn a dvd and use Ye Olde Postal Service.

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7484
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:06 pm

I charge $20 per DVD and don't keep back-ups.

User avatar
Jeff White
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3263
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jeff White » Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:14 pm

I really think that the client should (since if I was a client I would):

1) Supply a hard drive in an external enclosure that will hold the whole multi-track project once it is completed. DVDRs are so 2005.
2) Pay for all individual tracks to be bounced as zeroed out mono audio files through the insert plug-in chains used for achiving a sound during the mix. This then provides the client with tracks for re-mixing at a later date that are compatable with other systems. They don't have to worry about having the Waves Diamond bundle 5 yrs and 3000 miles from the original sessions.

I've had clients that are only interested in a CD as the end fruit of their labors. I guess that they regard the multi-tracks as a means to an end. I convince them to take them, as I am not a multi-track librarian.

Jeff

Johnny B
pushin' record
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY
Contact:

Post by Johnny B » Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:25 pm

ipressrecord wrote: 1) Supply a hard drive in an external enclosure that will hold the whole multi-track project once it is completed. DVDRs are so 2005.
DVDRs last longer in storage than hard drives. If hard drives don't get used, they die. Plus DVDRs are cheaper and take up less space. If it was my recording, that's what I'd be asking for.

river
pushin' record
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:05 am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Post by river » Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:25 pm

I always offer raw tracks to the client (they did pay for them, after all), and always archive a set myself.
"Madam, tomorrow I will be sober, but you'll still be ugly" Winston Churchill

bewarethanatos
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:42 am
Location: Lancaster, PA

Post by bewarethanatos » Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:43 pm

We always give clients the DVDRs with the RAW tracks (all the tracks before they were altered with plug-ins, or run through outboard compressors or whatever) free of charge. We then make ourselves a copy of the raw track DVDR's, and also keep the session files and tracks (including plug-ins and sub'd tracks) on the back-up HDD.

jakerock
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by jakerock » Sat Sep 15, 2007 5:17 pm

Johnny B wrote:
ipressrecord wrote: 1) Supply a hard drive in an external enclosure that will hold the whole multi-track project once it is completed. DVDRs are so 2005.
DVDRs last longer in storage than hard drives. If hard drives don't get used, they die. Plus DVDRs are cheaper and take up less space. If it was my recording, that's what I'd be asking for.
Not arguing, but just wondering how you know this about DVDR shelf life?
I recently heard an interview on AudioNowcast with a couple of NASA people who are in charge of backing up the data from space missions, and they said that DVDR's have about 5 years to live...
Just wondering what the truth is on this subject.

Thanks, Jason

User avatar
Cellotron
tinnitus
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

Post by Cellotron » Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:44 pm

I make DVD-R backs up of all session files for clients at $50 a pop (to cover my time of creating them) - or if it is an attended session and the client has brought their own extrernal hard drive in I'll do a dump to it with them just covering the studio time it takes to do the transfer. If the client wants an FTP transfer instead I just do a $30 charge to cover the time it takes for me to set this up on my server.

While I do make backups regularly so I can have access to jobs in case a revision or extra master copies are requested, I still don't allow myself to be held liable for having data available once the job has been finished and completely approved - so I'd prefer having the client's access to these easy in case they want them for the future.

As far as maintaining an archive of digital files for long term future use:
* redundancy and use of multiple formats is key to longevity. The more copies and the more formats (i.e. at this point best bet is going to both DVD-R / hard drive) you use the much better likelihood you have for being able to open them at a date in the future
* keeping files uncompressed and/or not using any proprietary formats for data archiving over multiple discs also allows for greater ease of opening files at a later date.
* adhering to AES / NARAS recommendations for digital audio file archiving means using wav format (with optinally a BWF file extension for any metadata such as time stamps).
* in order to maintain any archive for future use be well prepared to have to migrate files to a new format approximately every 10 years. (i.e. it's really heading to past the time for me to get off my bum and transfer a pile of DAT's I still have sitting on the shelves over to wav files)

Best regards,
Steve Berson

KyleHale
gettin' sounds
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: atlanta

Post by KyleHale » Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:07 am

Photographers usually don't give the negatives to their clients(in some cases), only positive prints because they own the rights to the negatives. In the same regard, you own the rights to what you record, so it is up to you whether or not you want to give or sell them the original wav files. Personally, I give it to clients free of charge because I'm scared I may loose my backups and not have the DVD years from now!

jakerock
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by jakerock » Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:35 am

KyleHale wrote:Photographers usually don't give the negatives to their clients(in some cases), only positive prints because they own the rights to the negatives. In the same regard, you own the rights to what you record, so it is up to you whether or not you want to give or sell them the original wav files. Personally, I give it to clients free of charge because I'm scared I may loose my backups and not have the DVD years from now!
Yeah, I keep DVD's of everything, but would rather it be THEIR responsibility...

As far as "owning" the wav files... Ownership need defining here...

I have a big folder full of multitracked drum performances, mostly my own, but at times I will grab a particularly good one from a clients session to use for demoing or whatever...
I would never assume that those performances "belonged to me" as far as being able to keep them and use them on a release...

Am I wrong about that?

KyleHale
gettin' sounds
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: atlanta

Post by KyleHale » Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:03 am

Recording labels own the rights to a percentage of individuals songs and studios own the rights to a percentage of the recordings, look at any record contract. That's what percentages are for. As far as using them, you would probably need to be in mutual agreement with the client that you could use the tracks as long as you give credit to the person who played the track.

jakerock
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by jakerock » Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:37 am

Hmm...
I dont make my clients sign anything, and im not sure that they would agree to the idea of my ownership of this type of thing.
I would LOVE to be able to use some of the drumtracks in my library for my own releases... I think the only way I could feel good about that is to ask / get them to sign something, and pay for the performance. I really dont think I can use this stuff legally or morally without prior agreeement... And I mean prior to the recording session beginning.

What do you think???
Jake

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests