cutting freqs from the top and bottom

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
cleantone
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:44 am

cutting freqs from the top and bottom

Post by cleantone » Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:23 pm

Hey folks. I'm working on an album right now. The band wants an old school vibe. It's afrobeat with a touch of funk sort of. So Fela Kuti albums were suggested as a reference before tracking. Of course there was not budget so we did six tunes in one day all live tracking in one big room. 9 piece band (8 sans singer). We over dubbed vocals (lead and bg) and some extra percussion. The singer plays percussion live.

Anyway I started taking more top off of the tracks than probably ever before. I was hoping to have that help me build something a little more old school sounding without being able to track it the way Fela would have. The band seems to think he used one "vintage" mic live to tape. Obviously not the case but whatever helps them sleep. We did not go that route of course. Anyway, it really seems to be working. I've only started on the single.

I am making this post because I noticed how much it helped me avoid harshness in the highs. I rolled off more frequencies than ever before and it works surprisingly well.

I am still learning and getting chops when it comes to mixing. Who isn't right? I was hoping folks might share some stories or tips about trimming away stuff from tracks to keep the mix solid and avoid cloudiness or harshness, etc...
Last edited by cleantone on Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

okcrecording
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:05 pm
Location: OK

Post by okcrecording » Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:17 pm

agreed cleantone,

acoustic guitars, my main use of this, especially in dense mixes.

Ribbon Mics!! this pretty much does the same thing, from the source. which is cleaner than the possible smearing you might get with eq.

Looking around on google for Fela Kuti, most albums are from the 70's and were on MCA, which could mean, 2" tape machine, large expensive console, mic locker to die for, and amazing rooms for ambient tracks. and more possibly ribbon mics, especially on sax.

bentonevolution
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 9:45 pm

Post by bentonevolution » Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:35 pm

I think the key may be compressing the highs with a multi-band compressor instead of a straight up roll off.

User avatar
Recycled_Brains
resurrected
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Albany, NY
Contact:

Post by Recycled_Brains » Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:40 pm

i like to do this with overheads. i hate bright overheads. i did a jazz record last year where i put a hi-shelving EQ at around 5kHz, and just boosted like 1 or 3 dB, and then put a low-pass filter at like 12kHz with a pretty gentle slope. probably 6-8dB/octave or so. still had that sparkle, but not harsh at all.

it's nice for pushing stuff farther back in the mix too.

-ryan
Ryan Slowey
Albany, NY

http://maggotbrainny.bandcamp.com

cleantone
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:44 am

Post by cleantone » Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:08 pm

I think the key may be compressing the highs with a multi-band compressor instead of a straight up roll off.
That would really add up on the processor in a lot of cases. I hear you though.

User avatar
logancircle
tinnitus
Posts: 1107
Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 8:45 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by logancircle » Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:54 pm

Try a, *gasp*, De-Esser. I've done this to overheads and lots of other stuff instead of a MBC. This would be easier on your processer if it is slow. You'd want to mess around with the settings a lot so it's not too violent and you don't feel like you have cotton in your ears or brain.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Studio and Field Recorder in NYC.
I like dirt.
IG: stormydanielson

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

standup
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 722
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Post by standup » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:18 pm

I was just reading Geoff Emerick's book on the Beatles. He said when they recorded Wings in Nigeria the EMI studio there wasn't in the habit of doing overdubs. The engineers apparently didn't know what that was.

If 70s afrobeat LPs were recorded in Africa and not in Europe or the US it's possible they went live to 8 track then mixed without any overdubs, from what Emerick says.

At EMI Lagos he said there was a box of mics, one or two Neumanns and some miscellaneous mics he didn't detail. Dynamics?

cleantone
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:44 am

Post by cleantone » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:24 pm

Well we tracked it weeks ago. All in one big room. drumkit, bass, gtr, gtr, rhodes and motif, tenor, trumpet, alto. We overdubbed in the same room but made a faux iso booth. That was vox, vox vox, bg vox, bg vox vox, clava, dumbek, shakere, and balafon. Not all of those were used for every tune of course. So were are working with what is layed down and will not be doing retakes. Although I am always up for it if the need is there.

The Fela stuff that I have heard was probably done live to tape. But not one microphone by any means. You can hear a lot of mistakes musically and engineering wise as well. It has a great raw sound though for sure. I just know they were not recording to an Alesis for any of those. You dig ;)

qball
pushin' record
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 6:05 am
Location: Central NY

Post by qball » Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:37 pm

standup wrote:I was just reading Geoff Emerick's book on the Beatles.
Holy crap! I was just finished that book and really opened my eyes to a different approach to recording & mixing. I suggest that anyone who wants that old school sound to read that book and listen to the old Beatles recordings.
I think women should leave the toilet seat UP!!!

kinger
steve albini likes it
Posts: 382
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Vancouver Island

Post by kinger » Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:09 pm

+1 on using ribbons to get a vintage vibe, they have that nice smooth, non-brittle high-end.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests